Skip to main content

Table 2 Visual acuity and refractive results three months after implantation

From: Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study

Parameter

AT LISA tri 839MP Groups

SBL-3 Groups

P Value

Group A

Axial Myopia Group

Group B

Control Group

Group C

Axial Myopia Group

Group D

Control Group

UDVA (logMAR)

0.07 ± 0.10

0.06 ± 0.07

0.13 ± 0.17

0.09 ± 0.07

0.315

UIVA (logMAR)

0.08 ± 0.09

0.09 ± 0.11

0.13 ± 0.10

0.08 ± 0.10

0.377

UNVA (logMAR)

0.12 ± 0.10

0.14 ± 0.11

0.11 ± 0.08

0.08 ± 0.09

0.234

CDVA (logMAR)

0.01 ± 0.02c

0.02 ± 0.04c

0.09 ± 0.14a,b

0.04 ± 0.04

0.003*

CIVA (logMAR)

0.11 ± 0.09

0.12 ± 0.10

0.14 ± 0.09

0.10 ± 0.10

0.669

CNVA (logMAR)

0.09 ± 0.10

0.11 ± 0.09

0.10 ± 0.11

0.09 ± 0.10

0.802

Sphere (D)

0.11 ± 0.38

-0.11 ± 0.46

-0.03 ± 0.39

-0.15 ± 0.42

0.188

Cylinder (D)

-0.75 ± 0.41

-0.56 ± 0.44

-0.51 ± 0.50

-0.54 ± 0.53

0.337

SE (D)

-0.26 ± 0.32

-0.39 ± 0.36

-0.28 ± 0.40

-0.42 ± 0.45

0.478

Prediction error of SE (D)

0.11 ± 0.34c,d

0.26 ± 0.33d

0.40 ± 0.37a

0.52 ± 0.44a,b

0.005*

  1. Kruskal-Walli one-way ANOVA test; All data are expressed as mean ± SD
  2. UDVA Uncorrected distance visual acuity, UIVA Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, UNVA Uncorrected near visual acuity, CDVA Corrected distance visual acuity, CIVA Corrected intermediate visual acuity, CNVA Corrected near visual acuity, logMAR Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, D diopter, SE Spherical equivalent
  3. aP < 0.05 versus Group A (the axial myopia trifocal group)
  4. bP < 0.05 versus Group B (the control trifocal group)
  5. cP < 0.05 versus Group C (the axial myopia bifocal group)
  6. dP < 0.05 versus Group D (the control bifocal group)
  7. *P < 0.05 among four groups