Skip to main content

Table 3 Aberrations, MTF and SR three months after implantation

From: Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study

Parameter

AT LISA tri 839MP Groups

SBL-3 Groups

P Value

Group A

Axial Myopia Group

Group B

Control Group

Group C

Axial Myopia Group

Group D

Control Group

Total aberration

0.59 ± 0.22c,d

0.68 ± 0.21c,d

1.24 ± 0.14a,b

1.24 ± 0.19a,b

 < 0.001*

Higher order aberration

0.26 ± 0.12c,d

0.30 ± 0.12c,d

0.72 ± 0.13a,b

0.75 ± 0.16a,b

 < 0.001*

Coma aberration

0.07 ± 0.05c,d

0.09 ± 0.06

0.15 ± 0.06a

0.16 ± 0.07a

0.001*

Spherical aberration

0.01 ± 0.01d

0.02 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.02a

0.022*

Trefoil aberration

0.23 ± 0.12c,d

0.25 ± 0.13c,d

0.68 ± 0.14a,b

0.70 ± 0.18a,b

 < 0.001*

MTF

36.58 ± 10.18c,d

34.05 ± 9.29c,d

22.07 ± 2.81a,b

21.66 ± 2.82a,b

 < 0.001*

SR

0.05 ± 0.03c,d

0.04 ± 0.03 c,d

0.02 ± 0.01a,b

0.02 ± 0.01 a,b

 < 0.001*

  1. Kruskal-Walli one-way ANOVA test; All data are expressed as mean ± SD
  2. MTF Modulation Transfer Function, SR Strehl ratio
  3. aP < 0.05 versus Group A (the axial myopia trifocal group)
  4. bP < 0.05 versus Group B (the control trifocal group)
  5. cP < 0.05 versus Group C (the axial myopia bifocal group)
  6. dP < 0.05 versus Group D (the control bifocal group)
  7. *P < 0.05 among four groups