- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Treatment of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in an Indian rural facility: a study of 38 eyes
BMC Ophthalmology volume 24, Article number: 389 (2024)
Abstract
Purpose
To report the demographic profile, clinical presentation, and management outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) treated with primary topical chemotherapy in a limited resource secondary eye care facility in rural parts of South India.
Methods
Retrospective interventional study of 38 eyes of 37 patients with OSSN treated with topical 1% 5-Fluorouracil (5FU), over a period of two years.
Results
The median age at presentation with OSSN was 44 years (mean, 46 years; range 13 to 74 years). Majority (76%) were males. The most common morphological variant was placoid OSSN (18, 47%). Limbus was the most common epicenter (31, 82%). Corneal OSSN was the most initially misdiagnosed variant (n = 3). Of the 38 eyes receiving one week on and 3-weeks off cycles of 5FU regimen, complete tumor resolution was achieved in 36 (95%) eyes. The median number of topical 5FU cycles for tumor resolution was 2 (mean, 2; range, 1 to 4). Over a median follow-up period of 5 months (mean, 6 months; range, 1 to 27 months), tumor recurrence was noted in 3 eyes (8%), of which one case had xeroderma pigmentosum with bilateral multifocal recurrence. Complication rate was 5% (n = 2), which included transient conjunctival hyperemia (n = 1), and bacterial keratitis (n = 1) which resolved with fortified antibiotics.
Conclusion
Primary chemotherapy with topical 1% 5FU is a safe and effective management modality for OSSN at limited resource settings in rural India.
Introduction
Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) represents a wide spectrum of neoplastic squamous lesions involving the conjunctiva, limbus, or cornea. Overall, OSSN is the most common conjunctival ocular malignancy, and the most common malignant ocular tumor in > 10 years’ age group in the Indian subcontinent [1]. Occurrence of OSSN is multifactorial, the major risk factors being ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation exposure, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human papilloma virus (HPV), ocular surface injury, vitamin A deficiency, and heavy cigarette smoking [2]. Increased outdoor time (> 50%) in the initial six years of life while residing within thirty degrees latitude to the equator is associated with a higher risk of developing OSSN [3].
Over the past two decades, with the advent of topical chemo and immunotherapeutic agents and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), management of OSSN has experienced a paradigm shift from surgical excision to primary medical management [4, 5]. Majority of the studies on OSSN, however, hail either from developed countries or from urban tertiary centers of developing countries [6,7,8]. While almost 70% of the population in India resides in rural areas where majority are engaged in outdoor activities, literature describing clinical profile and management challenges of OSSN in these limited resource settings is scarce [9]. Herein, we report the demographic details, clinical features, and management outcomes of OSSN at a limited resource rural facility, and also propose guidelines for referral to a tertiary eyecare center.
Materials and methods
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of LV Prasad Eye Institute (LEC – BHR – R – 03–23 – 1024) and the study adhered to the guidelines of Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent has been obtained from the patients/parents/legal guardian for study participation and publication.
A retrospective interventional study was conducted at a limited resource secondary eyecare facility in Southern India, affiliated with L V Prasad Eye Institute. Inclusion criteria were cases of OSSN diagnosed based on clinical and AS-OCT (Primus 200, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) characteristics, by ocular oncology trainees (NG, AA) in the rural facility, treated with topical Fluorouracil 1% (5FU), and had a follow-up after completion of medical treatment as prescribed. The study period was between February 2021 to March 2023. Cases of OSSN who were lost to follow-up during or before completion of medical treatment with 5FU were excluded from the study.
Diffuse OSSN was defined as lesion extending beyond 6 clock hours of the limbus. The AS-OCT features suggestive of OSSN included hyper-reflective thickened epithelium with abrupt transition from normal to abnormal epithelium, with or without back-shadowing or an underlying cleavage plane. Patients requiring further investigations or advanced care such as cases with inconclusive diagnosis of OSSN or those needing excisional biopsy of OSSN were referred to the nearest associated tertiary eye centre, a referral system based on the unique pyramid eye model developed by LV Prasad Eye Institute [10].
A cyclical regimen of topical 1% 5FU four times/day for a week with 3 weeks of drug holiday was initiated upon diagnosis of OSSN. All affected eyes were prescribed adjuvant topical lubricants, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, four times/day for a month. Tumor response was graded as ‘good’ if there was no tumor residue, ‘moderate’ if tumor responded with > 50% reduction, ‘poor’ if there was < 50% reduction, and ‘nil’ if there was no change in tumor size. Successful outcome was defined as complete tumor resolution based on clinical findings and confirmed on AS-OCT.
Statistical analysis
Data was managed in the Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA) software. The mean, median, and interquartile ranges were calculated for continuous variables. For categorical variables, results were expressed in terms of either frequency or percentage. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
A total of 45 OSSN cases were seen at the secondary eyecare facility during the study period. Of these, 38 eyes of 37 patients (82%) were included in this study based on the defined inclusion criteria. Nine eyes of 8 patients (18%) were excluded due to inadequate follow-up (n = 8) or referral to tertiary eyecare facility due to concomitant microbial keratitis (n = 1). The median age at presentation of OSSN was 44 years (mean, 46 years; range, 13 to 74 years). Of the 37 patients, 28 (76%) were males, and 9 were females (24%). Majority (31, 82%) had outdoor occupation. One (3%) patient with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) had bilateral presentation. OSSN was an incidental finding in 3 cases (8%). A summary of demographic details is provided in Table 1.
Four cases of OSSN were initially misdiagnosed, which included 3 cases of corneal OSSN and one case of noduloulcerative OSSN. Corneal OSSN was initially diagnosed as interstitial keratitis (n = 1), viral epithelial keratitis (n = 1), and limbal stem cell deficiency (n = 1) and noduloulcerative variant of OSSN was misdiagnosed as pseudoepithelomatous hyperplasia, by a comprehensive ophthalmologist.
While the cornea was the epicenter in 3 eyes (8%), corneal involvement was noted in 19 (50%) cases. OSSN was multifocal, involving nasal and temporal quadrants bilaterally in case of XP. Nasal quadrant was involved in 20 eyes (53%), temporal in 18 (47%), and inferior in 1 (3%) eye. OSSN had varied morphological variants in our cohort, the most common being the placoid type (n = 18, 47%). Typical appearance of corneal OSSN in the form of greyish opalescent layer with fimbriated edges was identified in 2 cases (5%). Clinical features are summarized in Table 2.
Topical 1% 5FU chemotherapy cyclical regimen was successfully administered in all 38 eyes. Of these, good tumor response was achieved in 36 (95%) eyes (Fig. 1), and no response in 2 eyes (Table 2). The median number of cycles until complete tumor resolution were 2 (mean 2; range, 1 to 4). Complications with topical 5FU included transient conjunctival hyperemia (n = 1), and development of microbial keratitis during the second cycle of 5FU therapy (n = 1).
Over a mean follow-up period of 17 months (median 16 months; range, 5 to 39 months), tumor recurrence was noted in 3 eyes (8%) after complete tumor resolution. The median interval between tumor resolution and tumor recurrence was 6 months (mean, 4 months; range, 1 to 6 months).
Discussion
A significant proportion of the Indian subcontinent belong to the underserved rural areas. Firstly, there is a lack of proper medical infrastructure and social awareness regarding ocular tumors in this section of society. Secondly, evidence reveals an underutilization of already well-established eyecare services in these areas [11]. Although the exact incidence of ocular surface tumors in India is unknown, the reported incidence from an Electronic medical record (EMR)-based data from a tertiary eyecare center is < 1%.1 This study was undertaken to recognize the demographic distribution, clinical presentation, management outcomes, and the referral patterns of OSSN reporting to a limited resource secondary eyecare unit in rural India.
Males comprised 76% of all cases in our cohort, which is similar to the reported average of 68 to 70% [8, 12] Although one may argue that males are more likely to involve in outdoor occupations leading to higher exposure to UV radiation, in rural areas there is considerable outdoor exposure to women as well. The male predominance can be attributed to the notion that males being the predominant breadwinners of the society, are twice as likely to seek health care than females in rural areas [11].
Though surgical excision is the gold standard treatment for OSSN, wide excisional biopsy with cryotherapy to surgical margins and ocular surface reconstruction with amniotic membrane graft (AMG) is challenging in a limited resource healthcare setup in rural India. Also, pathology centers for processing of excised specimens do not exist in most parts of rural India. With the availability of AS-OCT which provides optical biopsy confirming the diagnosis of OSSN, medical treatment of OSSN with topical medications is an emerging trend. Amongst the topical medications, Interferon alfa 2b (IFN-a2b) has shown to be effective against OSSN and is known to be associated with least complications compared to Mitomycin-C (MMC) and 5FU [13]. However, utilization of IFN-a2b in a rural setup is challenging owing to lack of availability of a refrigerator for drug storage in most rural households. In 2021, the National Family Healthy Survey (NFHS) of India, revealed a stark urban-rural divide on refrigerator ownership, with 63% urban households owning a refrigerator as opposed to only 25% ownership in rural households. These limits the utility of topical IFN-a2b in rural areas, as it requires a robust cold chain storage. Another considerable limiting factor is the difference in the cost of one vial of IFN-a2b, which is atleast three times more expensive than a vial of 5FU (250 mg/5mL) in the Indian subcontinent [14]. MMC is also effective for OSSN but has a relatively increased side-effect profile compared to IFN-a2b and also requires cold chain maintenance [15].
Due to the above-mentioned challenges, all OSSN cases were being referred to tertiary care centers for confirmation of diagnosis and further management, till 2 years ago. At our secondary eyecare facility, though trained eyecare professionals are available, surgical excision was not possible due to lack of cryotherapy, AMG, and pathology setup; IFN-a2b and MMC were not ideal due to limitations with cold chain maintenance. Based on the published literature, topical 5FU has shown encouraging results, [16] is inexpensive compared to IFN-a2b and MMC, and the drug can be stored at room temperature. These factors encouraged us to initiate the use of topical 5FU as the first line of management of OSSN in our rural setup. Also, AS-OCT was available at the rural setup at regular intervals through an advanced mobile diagnostic unit “Pashyantu”, aiding in confirmation of diagnosis of OSSN, prior to initiation of medical treatment.
The first usage of 5FU for OSSN dates back to 1986, when de Keizer et al. reported a case of intraepithelial neoplasia involving the cornea and conjunctiva, successfully managed with instillation of topical 5FU [17]. Since then, this chemotherapeutic agent has gained worldwide popularity as a primary monotherapy for OSSN. Venkateswaran et al. in their direct comparison between primary topical 5FU and IFN-a2b therapy showed comparable efficacy (96% in 5FU versus 81% in IFN-a2b group) in the primary management of OSSN. In their study, although 5FU showed superiority based on univariate analysis, multivariate regression showed no statistically significant difference between the two therapies [18]. In our study, complete tumor resolution with topical 5FU monotherapy was seen in 95% and is consistent with the published literature. The mean number of topical 5FU cycles for complete tumor resolution was 2 cycles, indicating the mean duration to tumor resolution being 2 months. This reflects the relatively quicker time to resolution when compared to the published literature reporting mean duration to resolution as 4–6 months [16, 19]. This could be related to referral bias in tertiary health care centers versus early diagnosis of smaller lesions in a rural setup.
Tumor recurrence was noted in 3 of the 36 eyes after complete tumor resolution with topical 5FU monotherapy. Two of these recurrences were noted in the youngest case (13 years) of our cohort, who had bilateral multifocal OSSN with XP, a well-established association [20]. XP was detected only when the patient had sought care at our eye center for the growing ocular surface mass. The sequential multifocal involvement and tumor recurrence despite topical 5FU and the need for genetic testing led to referral to our tertiary eyecare center. Considering the proven association of XP with ocular, periocular, head and neck malignancies, and higher recurrence rates of OSSN, awareness regarding this condition amongst the general population as well as healthcare personnel, and the need for lifelong follow-up should be highlighted [21].
Reported complications following topical 1% 5FU therapy vary in severity, ranging from transient hyperemia, pain, eyelid edema, to rare sight-threatening complications such as perforated corneal ulcer and stromal melt. Tendency for causing keratopathy and eyelid edema is significantly more, when compared to IFN-a2b [18, 22, 23]. However, recent long-term studies have shown reasonable side-effect profile of IFN-a2b with comparable rates of hyperemia between IFN-a2b and 5FU (19% versus 23%, respectively) [24]. In our series, 5FU related adverse effects were noted in 2 eyes (5%). One patient developed transient conjunctival hyperemia not warranting discontinuation of 5FU therapy, and another case developed bacterial keratitis during the last cycle of 5FU therapy, which resolved with fortified antibiotics. The authors recommend avoiding topical 5FU in cases with pre-existing dellen or compromised cornea. None of the patients in our series had eyelid edema, periocular excoriation, or pigmentation, which may be due to adequate counselling of patients on the appropriate way of instilling these eye drops, avoiding exposure of the drug to the periocular surface.
This was a retrospective case series with a small sample size and limited duration of follow-up. Though the study was in a rural set-up, there was availability of AS-OCT which was crucial in confirming the diagnosis and monitoring the treatment response. Such a facility may not be available at all rural setups. Despite these limitations, the authors strongly advocate for topical 1% 5FU as a safe and effective primary monotherapy for OSSN in limited resource settings of rural areas. However, topical chemotherapy should be judiciously used only in definitive OSSN cases. Whenever the diagnosis is uncertain, topical chemotherapy should be avoided and the patients should be referred to higher centers for an appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The authors propose the following referral guidelines for better overall success rates: (a) Diagnostic dilemma with atypical AS-OCT features, (b) Scleral fixity of OSSN, (c) No or suboptimal response beyond 3 cycles of topical 5FU, (d) Worsening of OSSN despite treatment initiation, (e) Tumor recurrence, and (f) OSSN in setting of corneal dellen, microbial keratitis, or compromised ocular surface. A closer follow-up is recommended in patients of XP and HIV.
Data availability
The corresponding author, Dr Swathi Kaliki can be contacted at kalikiswathi@yahoo.com to obtain access to the raw data analysed in this study.
References
Kaliki S, Das AV. Ocular and Periocular Tumors in India: an EyeSmart Electronic Medical Record Analysis of 9633 cases from a Referral Center. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020;27:199–203.
Basti S, Macsai MS. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a review. Cornea. 2003;22:687–704.
Lee GA, Williams G, Hirst LW, Green AC. Risk factors in the development of ocular surface epithelial dysplasia. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:360–4.
Shields CL, Constantinescu AB, Paulose SA, Yaghy A, Dalvin LA, Shields JA, et al. Primary treatment of ocular surface squamous neoplasia with topical interferon alpha-2b: comparative analysis of outcomes based on original tumor configuration. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:563–7.
Nanji AA, Sayyad FE, Galor A, Dubovy S, Karp CL. High-resolution optical coherence tomography as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of corneal and conjunctival pathology. Ocul Surf. 2015;13:226–35.
Hӧllhumer R, Michelow P, Williams S. Demographics, clinical presentation and risk factors of ocular surface squamous neoplasia at a tertiary hospital, South Africa. Eye (Lond). 2023;37:3602–8.
Segev F, Mimouni M, Tessler G, Hilely A, Ofir S, Kidron D, et al. A 10-year survey: prevalence of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in clinically benign pterygium specimens. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40:1284–7.
Kao AA, Galor A, Karp CL, Abdelaziz A, Feuer WJ, Dubovy SR. Clinicopathologic correlation of ocular surface squamous neoplasms at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute: 2001 to 2010. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1773–6.
Gichuhi S, Macharia E, Kabiru J, Zindamoyen AM, Rono H, Ollando E, et al. Clinical presentation of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in Kenya. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:1305–13.
Rao GN, Khanna RC, Athota SM, Rajshekar V, Rani PK. Integrated model of primary and secondary eye care for underserved rural areas: the L V Prasad Eye Institute experience. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60:396–400.
Fletcher AE, Donoghue M, Devavaram J, Thulasiraj RD, Scott S, Abdalla M, et al. Low uptake of eye services in rural India: a challenge for programs of blindness prevention. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1393–9.
Yousef YA, Finger PT. Squamous carcinoma and dysplasia of the conjunctiva and cornea: an analysis of 101 cases. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:233–40.
Hӧllhumer R, Williams S, Michelow P. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia: management and outcomes. Eye (Lond). 2021;35:1562–73.
Kaliki S, Singh S, Iram S, Tripuraneni D. Recombinant interferon alpha 2b for ocular surface squamous neoplasia: an efficient and cost-effective treatment modality in Asian Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64:702–9.
Nanji AA, Sayyad FE, Karp CL. Topical chemotherapy for ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:336–42.
Joag MG, Sise A, Murillo JC, Sayed-Ahmed IO, Wong JR, Mercado C, et al. Topical 5-Fluorouracil 1% as primary treatment for ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1442–8.
de Keizer RJ, de Wolff-Rouendaal D, van Delft JL. Topical application of 5-fluorouracil in premalignant lesions of cornea, conjunctiva and eyelid. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986;64:31–42.
Venkateswaran N, Mercado C, Galor A, Karp CL. Comparison of topical 5-fluorouracil and interferon alfa-2b as primary treatment modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;199:216–22.
Wylegala A, Sripawadkul W, Zein M, Alvarez OP, Al Bayyat G, Galor A, et al. Topical 1% 5-fluorouracil eye drops as primary treatment for ocular surface squamous neoplasia: long-term follow-up study. Ocul Surf. 2023;27:67–74.
Gupta N, Sachdev R, Tandon R. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia in xeroderma pigmentosum: clinical spectrum and outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1217–21.
Kaliki S, Jajapuram SD, Maniar A, Mishra DK. Ocular and Periocular Tumors in Xeroderma Pigmentosum: a study of 120 Asian Indian patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;198:146–53.
Lin WV, Rand GM, Miller ML, Marr BP, Suh LH. A case of sight threatening complications from topical 1% 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022;25:101265.
Parrozzani R, Lazzarini D, Alemany-Rubio E, Urban F, Midena E. Topical 1% 5-fluorouracil in ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a long-term safety study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):355–9.
Sripawadkul W, Reyes-Capo D, Zein M, Wylegala A, Albayyat G, Galor A, et al. Long term study of topical interferon α-2b eye drops as primary treatment of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Ocul Surf. 2023;28:108–14.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
Support provided by The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer (Swathi Kaliki) and Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation (Swathi Kaliki), Hyderabad, India. The funders had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ayushi Agarwal: Material preparation, data collection, data analysis, and preparation of first draft, approval of final draft Neha Ghose: Material preparation, data collection, data analysis, revision of the draft, and approval of final draftVarsha Rathi: Study design, revision of the draft, and approval of final draftRohit Khanna: Study design, revision of the draft, and approval of final draftSwathi Kaliki: Study conception and design, revision of the draft, and approval of final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of LV Prasad Eye Institute (March 24, 2023/No LEC-BHR-R-03-23-1024). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants/parents/legal guardian included in the study.
Conflict of interests
No conflicting relationship exists for any author
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, A., Ghose, N., Rathi, V. et al. Treatment of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in an Indian rural facility: a study of 38 eyes. BMC Ophthalmol 24, 389 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03657-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03657-6