Macular Retinal Layer Thickness and Associated Factors. The Beijing Eye Study 2011

Diagnosis and follow-up of retinal diseases may be improved if the thickness of the various retinal layers, in addition to the total retinal thickness, is taken into account. Here we measured the thickness of the macular retinal layers in a population-based study group to assess the normative values and their associations. Using spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images, we measured the thickness of the macular retinal layers in participants of the population-based Beijing Eye Study without ocular diseases and without arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. pigment epithelium detachment, retinal detachment, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and central serous chorioretinopathy. Myopia and incipient cataract not affecting the quality of the OCT images were no reason for exclusion of the individual. membrane thickness (26.3 ± 4.8 μm) in the central subfield showed an age-related thinning after an age of 45 years. The findings obtained in our study suggest that the ageing process affected all retinal layers in all regions of the macula. These results were supported by the findings obtained in histological studies in which 0.3% to 0.6% of the retinal ganglion cells and retinal ganglion cell axons, 0.2% of the photoreceptor cones, 0.4% of the photoreceptor rods and 0.3% of the RPE cells were lost per year.


Abstract
Background Diagnosis and follow-up of retinal diseases may be improved if the thickness of the various retinal layers, in addition to the total retinal thickness, is taken into account. Here we measured the thickness of the macular retinal layers in a population-based study group to assess the normative values and their associations.

Methods
Using spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images, we measured the thickness of the macular retinal layers in participants of the population-based Beijing Eye Study without ocular diseases and without arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus.

Results
The study included 384 subjects (mean age:60.0±8.0 years). In multivariable analysis, the thickness of the retinal layers in the foveal region, of all retinal layers except for the outer plexiform layer in the parafoveal area, and the thickness of the ganglion cell layer, inner plexiform layer and inner and outer nuclear layer in the perifoveal area decreased with older age (all P<0.05). Men as compared to women had higher thickness measurements of the photoreceptor layer and outer nuclear layer in all areas, and of all layers between the retinal nerve fiber layer and inner nuclear layer in the parafovea area. The associations between the macular retinal layers thickness and axial length were not consistent. The inner plexiform layer was thicker, and the ganglion cell layer and inner nuclear layer were thinner, in the temporal areas than in the nasal areas,

Conclusions
The associations between decreasing thickness of most retinal layers with older age and the correlation of a higher thickness of some retinal layer layers with male gender may clinically be taken into account.

Background
The clinical introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT), allowing the intravital non-invasive visualization of the various retinal layers with a spatial resolution of approximately 5 to 10 µm has markedly improved the possibilities in the diagnosis of retinal and optic nerve diseases. 1,2 Besides the total retinal thickness, the thickness of the inner retinal layers, namely the retinal nerve fiber layer and the retinal ganglion cell layer, has routinely been measured for the diagnosis and follow-up examination of optic nerve diseases, in particular of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. [3][4][5][6] In contrast, the thickness of the middle and deep retinal layers has usually not routinely been assessed. [9][10][11][12][13][14] After automated algorithms have recently been developed, the thickness of the middle and deep retinal layers has been determined in healthy eyes, eyes with glaucoma and in eyes after optic neuritis. 5,9,13,14,15 Limitations of these studies were their design as hospital-based investigations and the relatively small size of the study populations. We therefore conducted the present study to measure the various retinal layers in a population-based investigation of healthy individuals.

Methods
The population-based, cross-sectional Beijing Eye Study 2011 was carried out in 5 communities in the urban district of Haidian in the North of Central Beijing and in 3 communities in the village area of Yufa of the Daxing District in the South of Beijing. 16,17 The only eligibility criteria for inclusion into the study were an age of 50+ years and living in the study region 18  The study participants underwent a series of examinations starting with an interview with standardized questions on the family status, level of education, income, depression, known major systemic diseases and quality of vision. The examination also included blood tests to measure the fasting blood concentrations of lipids, glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c. Blood pressure, body height and weight and the circumference of the waist and hip were recorded.
The ophthalmic examination included measurement of best-correcting refractive error, pneumatonometry, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment and biometry of the right eye using Using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) map, we measured the thickness of the retinal layers in 9 regions (Fig. 2). The macular area was divided into three concentric rings measuring 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm in diameter and which were centered on the fovea. The two outer rings with a diameter of 3 mm and 6 mm, respectively, were further divided into 4 equal regions (superior, inferior, nasal and temporal). The innermost ring with a diameter of 1 mm included the fovea (central subfield), while the 3 mm inner ring included the parafovea and 6 mm outer ring included the perifovea. The subfoveal choroidal thickness was additionally measured using the enhanced depth imaging modality of the OCT device. Only the right eye of each study participant was assessed. To assess the reproducibility of the measurement, we randomly selected 30 eyes of 30 participants and each parameter was measured three times in a masked manner with intervals of 2 weeks.
Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available statistical software package (SPSS for Windows, V. 25.0, IBM-SPSS, Chicago, IL). We first calculated the mean and standard deviation of the main outcome parameters. i.e. the thickness of the retinal layers in the fovea, parafovea and perifovea areas. Secondly, we compared the thickness of the 10 retinal layers in each sector using the Student t-test for paired samples. We assessed associations between the main outcome parameters and the other ocular or systemic variables in a univariate analysis. Finally, we carried out a multivariable analysis, with the retinal thickness parameters as dependent variable and with all those parameters as independent variables, which were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the retinal thickness parameters in the univariate analysis. We then dropped step by step those variables from the list of independent parameters, which either showed a high collinearity or which were no longer significantly associated with the outcome parameters. We additionally included the parameters of age, gender and axial length into the list of independent variables into the multivariate analysis, independently whether or not they were associated with the outcome parameters in the univariate analysis. The reason was that age, gender and axial length were associated with the retinal thickness in some previous studies. 19 Since the inner retinal layers were mostly absent in the fovea, only the thickness of the outer retinal layers was analyzed in the central subfield. We presented the standardized regression coefficient beta and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the non-standardized regression coefficient B. To assess the reproducibility of the measurement, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation were calculated. All P-values were two-sided and were considered statistically significant when the values were <0.05. The retinal nerve fiber layer was thinnest in the temporal areas, and it was the thickest in the perifoveal area, nasal to the fovea and closest to the optic nerve head (all P<0.001). The retina as a whole (full-thickness) was thinnest in the central foveal area and it was thickest in the parafoveal regions. In the parafoveal and perifoveal areas, the total retinal thickness was thicker in the nasal areas than in the temporal areas (P<0.001). The ganglion cell layer, the inner plexiform layer and the inner nuclear layer were the thickest in the parafoveal regions. In the perifoveal retinal areas, the inner plexiform layer was thicker in the temporal areas than in the nasal areas. The ganglion cell layer and the inner nuclear layer were thicker in the nasal areas than in the temporal areas in both the parafoveal and the perifoveal retinal areas. The thickness of the outer nuclear layer, the retinal pigment epithelium layer and the photoreceptor layer was thickest in the central foveal sector and decreased with increasing distance to the foveal center (Fig. 4).

Results
Men as compared to women had higher thickness measurements of the photoreceptor layer and ONL and of the inner retina in all areas, and of the RNFL, GCL, IPL and INL in the parafovea area ( Table 1).
The association between the thickness of each retinal layer in the area of the fovea, the parafovea and the perifovea and the ocular and systematic parameters was listed in Table 1.
The intraclass correlation for the 10 thickness measurements of the various retinal layers in the 9 macular sectors were all >0.90 with P-values <0.001, indicating a high intra-observer agreement.

Discussion
The thickness measurements we obtained for the whole retina in different macular sectors were similar to those obtained in previous studies of healthy eyes, such as the investigations performed by Appukuttan and colleagues. 20 The measurements taken in our study were larger than those obtained by Tewari and associates and by Gella and colleagues. 21,22 These discrepancies might have been due to differences in the OCT devices and in the segmentation methods applied. To cite an example, the definition of the outer retinal border differed in the four studies: it was the inner outer segment / RPE junction in Tewari's study, the inner RPE surface in Gellai's study, the outer RPE surface in Appukuttan's study, and Bruch's membrane in our investigation. [20][21][22] The regional distribution of the full retina thickness did not differ markedly among the studies, with the total retinal thickness being thicker in the nasal quadrant than in the temporal quadrant and being greater in the ETDRS inner ring than in the outer ring. 19,[23][24][25] The thickness of the RNFL, GCL, IPL and INL in each of the ETDRS sectors in our study were comparable to measurements taken in the studies carried out by Ooto and colleagues, while the INL thickness in Loduca's study and in our study was similar and the thickness of the RNFL and OPL in our study were thinner than in Loduca's study. 13,14 Both studies revealed a similar regional distribution of the thickness of the various retinal layers study, except for that we did not observe the IPL being thicker in the nasal area than in the temporal area. Spraul and coworkers reported on a mean histological RPE thickness of 11.3 ± 1.4 μm in the foveal area and of 9.1 ± 2.0 μm in the perifoveal area. 26 These histomorphometric values were lower than those obtained in our study applying SD-OCT. The discrepancy between the measurements might have been mainly due to differences in the techniques employed, in addition to a tissue shrinkage caused by the histological tissue fixation. The mean thickness of the photoreceptor layer in the central foveal area was thicker (90.0 ± 4.2 μm) in our study than in other investigations (65.5 ± 4.2 μm). 22 The association between the thickness of the retinal layers and age has been addressed in previous studies. These studies demonstrated that the total retinal thickness and the thickness of the GCL, IPL and INL decreased with older age. 14,25,27,28,29 In a similar manner, our investigation reported an agerelated reduction in the thickness of the whole retina, RPE and photoreceptor layer in the foveal region, of all retinal layers except for the OPL in the parafoveal area, and of the full retina, GCL, IPL, INL, ONL and IRL in the perifoveal region. In contrast to our and the other investigations, the UK Biobank Study revealed that, after exclusion of individuals with a history of ocular or systemic disease (diabetes or neurodegenerative diseases) and eyes with reduced vision, the mean central macular thickness in the central 1-mm ETDRS subfield (264.5 ± 22.9 μm) increased with older age and female gender, greater myopia, smoking, body mass index and white ethnicity. 30 As in our study, the macular thickness in other macular subfields decreased with older age and greater myopia. In another part of the UK Biobank study, Ko and colleagues reported that the mean retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch´s membrane thickness (26.3 ± 4.8 μm) in the central subfield showed an agerelated thinning after an age of 45 years. 31 The findings obtained in our study suggest that the ageing process affected all retinal layers in all regions of the macula. These results were supported by the findings obtained in histological studies in which 0.3% to 0.6% of the retinal ganglion cells and retinal ganglion cell axons, 0.2% of the photoreceptor cones, 0.4% of the photoreceptor rods and 0.3% of the RPE cells were lost per year. [32][33][34] The thinning of the ONL with older age was first reported by Gartner and Henkind. 35 The histomorphometric result of an age-related decline being more pronounced for rods than for cones is in agreement with the finding obtained in the present study in which the ONL thickness in the parafoveal region and perifoveal areas decreased with older age, while the thickness of the ONL in fovea was not significantly correlated with older age. 33 In another histomorphometric study conducted by Curcio and colleagues, rod density decreased by 30% during a life span of 27 to 90 years, while changes in the cone density throughout this age span did not reveal consistent relationships to age. 36 In the present study, men as compared to women had higher thickness measurements of the photoreceptor layer and ONL and of the inner retina in all areas, and of the RNFL, GCL, IPL and INL in the parafovea area. These results were consistent with, and partially contradictory to, findings of previous studies. It has been reported that the full-thickness retina in the foveal region and in the parafoveal areas was thicker in men than in women. 19,37 . Ooto and colleagues reported that the thickness of the OPL and ONL combined was significantly thicker in men than in women. 14 Associations between thickness measurements of the various layers and axial length were inconsistent. For most of the retinal layers, a thicker thickness was associated with a shorter axial length in the present study population, while in other layers, positive correlations were found.
Previous studies mostly focused on the association between axial length and the full retinal thickness and had contradictory results when they included or excluded highly myopic eyes. [37][38][39] Our study included individuals with a refractive error which ranged from -11.38 diopters to 5.50 diopters (mean: -0.12 ± 1.7 diopters, median: 0.25 diopters).
In the present study, we did not find significant associations between the various retinal layer thickness measurements and systematic parameters, such as level of education, region of habitation, body height and weight, waist and hip circumstance, blood pressure, pulse, blood concentrations of high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and creatinine, aspirin intake, smoking package years, and alcohol consumption. This result might have been influenced by the pre-selection of the participants of the present study which included only normal participants.
Potential limitations of our study should be mentioned. First, as a population-based study, this study might have been vulnerable to a selection artifact. Second, our study included individuals with a range of refractive error between -11.38 diopters to +5.50 diopters (mean: -0.12 ± 1.7 diopters, median: 0.25 diopters). The results can therefore not be transferred on eyes with more extreme refractive errors. Future studies may be needed to investigate the relationship between the thicknesses of the various retinal layers and axial length, in particularly in eyes with extreme axial myopia. Finally, as mentioned above, the variety of OCT-devices has led to a marked variability in retinal thickness layer measurements, so that differences between studies might have been due to differences in the measurement devices.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Availability of data and material
The datasets obtained and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.   Figure 2 The macular was divided into 9 areas according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The diameters of the 3 circles were 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm, respectively.

Figures
The innermost ring with a diameter of 1 mm was the fovea (central subfield) while the 3mm inner ring and 6mm outer ring were called the perifovea and the parafovea, respectively  Thickness distribution of the 10 retinal layers in the 9 retinal sectors.