Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryo Ichinohasama |
| 12 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jecko Thachil |
| 20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tan Aik Kah |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jecko Thachil |
| 19 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tan Aik Kah |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tan Aik Kah |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tan Aik Kah |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-11-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.