Skip to main content

Table 2 Factor loadings of quality aspects items according to the exploratory factor analysis with oblimin rotation

From: Patients' experiences with quality of hospital care: the Consumer Quality Index Cataract Questionnaire

nr

Item description

loading

α1

α2

ITC

 

Factor 1: Communication with ophthalmologist

 

0.89

  

Q7

Ophthalmologist treated me with respect

0.88

 

0.88

0.66

Q8

Ophthalmologist listened carefully

0.90

 

0.87

0.73

Q9

Ophthalmologist explained things clearly

0.75

 

0.88

0.67

Q10

Ophthalmologist spent enough time

0.85

 

0.87

0.74

Q11

Ophthalmologist went seriously into merits of my questions

0.81

 

0.87

0.78

Q12

Ophthalmologist shared decision making

0.68

 

0.87

0.74

Q13

Ophthalmologist took specific wishes into account

0.68

 

0.87

0.74

Q16

Ophthalmologist talked about things that went wrong

0.40

 

0.91

0.49

 

Factor 2: Communication with nurses

 

0.72

  

Q30

Nurses treat me with respect

0.84

 

0.66

0.56

Q31

Nurses listened carefully

0.84

 

0.59

0.63

Q32

Nurses explained things clearly

0.80

 

0.62

0.56

Q38

Information was adequately coordinated*

0.41

 

0.76

0.41

 

Factor 3: Communication about medication

 

0.79

  

Q50

Questions asked about allergic iodine

0.91

 

0.69

0.65

Q51

Questions asked about allergic medication

0.92

 

0.58

0.74

Q52

Clear information about side-effects medication

0.61

 

0.83

0.51

 

Factor 4: Rest items

 

0.52

  

Q16

Ophthalmologist talked about things that went wrong

0.41

 

0.43

0.33

Q38

Information was adequately coordinated

0.53

 

0.36

0.44

Q39

Care was adequately coordinated

0.57

 

0.36

0.40

Q63

How often did insurers compensate for costs medication

0.46

 

0.61

0.12

  1. Note: Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale (α1), Cronbach's alpha of the scale if item was deleted (α2), and corrected item total correlation (ITC) for the domains are shown. Factor loadings exceeding 0.40 are displayed. Q14, Q15, and Q49 were unrelated to any of the four factors and were not displayed.
  2. * low corrected item total correlation (ITC) and an increase of the Cronbach's alpha of factor 2 if Q38 was deleted (α = 0.76) led to the exclusion of Q38 from factor 2.