Peer Review reports
From: Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guilin Zhan |
13 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eve Higginbotham |
9 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guilin Zhan |
23 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eve Higginbotham |
23 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Jun 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-8-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.