Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients

Table 2 Uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity at 3 months postoperatively (logMAR)

		Micro monovision group	Non-micro monovision group	Mixed group	P	Adjusted P (Micro monovision vs. N Non-micro monovision)	Adjusted P (Micro monovision vs. Mixed)	Adjusted P (Mixed vs. Non-micro monovision)
UDVA	dominant eye	0.01 ± 0.09	0.02 ± 0.06	0.00 ± 0.05	0.469^a
	non-dominant eye	0.12 ± 0.13	0.04 ± 0.06	0.02 ± 0.09	0.134^a
	binoculus	-0.02 ± 0.07	-0.01 ± 0.05	-0.06 ± 0.07	0.143^a
UIVA	dominant eye	-0.03 ± 0.04	0.01 ± 0.06	-0.01 ± 0.06	0.769^a
	non-dominant eye	-0.03 ± 0.05	0.00 ± 0.04	0.19 ± 0.08	0.000^a*	0.332	0.000*	0.000*
	binoculus	-0.06 ± 0.04	-0.05 ± 0.04	-0.03 ± 0.06	0.001^a*	0.010*	0.003*	1
UNVA	dominant eye	0.15 ± 0.09	0.16 ± 0.07	0.17 ± 0.12	0.118^a
	non-dominant eye	0.02 ± 0.08	0.11 ± 0.06	0.00 ± 0.08	0.000^a*	0.000*	1.000	0.000*
	binoculus	0.00 ± 0.07	0.07 ± 0.04	-0.02 ± 0.06	0.000^a*	0.000*	1.000	0.000*

a: nonparametric test. Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was used to adjust the p value for between group comparisons. *: P < 0.05

ISSN: 1471-2415