Skip to main content

Table 6 Sub-group comparison in micro monocular group

From: Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients

  

0.75 ~ 1D (n = 5)

0.5 ~ 0.75D

(n = 15)

P

Age

59 ± 8.26

57.21 ± 9.15

0.675 a

Dominant eye

UNVA

0.15 ± 0.10

0.15 ± 0.19

0.977 a

UIVA

-0.06 ± 0.04

-0.03 ± 0.04

0.156 b

UDVA

0.00 ± 0.06

0.01 ± 0.07

0.964 b

Non-dominant eye

UNVA

0.00 ± 0.06

0.03 ± 0.09

0.687 b

UIVA

-0.05 ± 0.04

-0.03 ± 0.05

0.559 b

UDVA

0.20 ± 0.16

0.09 ± 0.1

0.082 a

Binoculus

UNVA

-0.02 ± 0.04

-0.003 ± 0.05

0.754 b

UIVA

-0.08 ± 0.00

-0.06 ± 0.04

0.319 b

UDVA

-0.01 ± 0.07

-0.02 ± 0.07

0.813 a

Stereoscopic vision

53.8 ± 12.6

73.5 ± 40.33

0.391 b

Pupil size under darkroom

 

4.43 ± 0.64

4.58 ± 0.96

0.612 a

corneal astigmatism

dominant eye

0.46 ± 0.21

0.42 ± 0.23

0.314 a

Non-dominant eye

0.44 ± 0.30

0.47 ± 0.38

0.178 a

Corneal SphAb

dominant eye

0.18 ± 0.03

0.18 ± 0.08

0.928 a

 

Non-dominant eye

0.19 ± 0.04

0.16 ± 0.08

0.316 a

  1. a: Independent sample t-test, b: nonparametric test