Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between the results of the ADEMd and UFOV tests

From: Could driving help us to “see better”? A comparative assessment of saccadic efficiency, visual speed, and attention

Variable

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

Age

Non-driver

− .368**

− .430**

.639**

.637**

.716**

.569*

.637*

.826**

Driver

− .291*

− .117

.069

.126

.298*

.548**

.717**

.838**

2

Hours reading

Non-driver

-

.118

− .361**

− .291*

− .363**

− .422

− .759*

− .617

Driver

-

.062

− .057

− .079

− .168

− .178

− .435**

− .386**

3

VF-14

Non-driver

 

-

− .520**

− .515**

− .392**

− .363

− .397

− .329

Driver

 

-

− .327*

− .268*

− .285*

− .011

− .167

− .230

4

ADEMd Vadj

Non-driver

  

-

.932**

.872**

− .018

− .053

− .090

Driver

  

-

.787**

.707**

.137

.243

.206

5

ADEMd Hadj

Non-driver

   

-

.888**

.032

.175

.140

Driver

   

-

.787**

.059

.163

.307*

6

ADEMd Hdadj

Non-driver

    

-

.349

.256

.334

Driver

    

-

.322*

.350**

.410**

7

UFOV Subtest 1

Non-driver

     

-

.710**

.495

Driver

     

-

.550**

.457**

8

UFOV Subtest 2

Non-driver

      

-

.703**

Driver

      

-

.816**

9

UFOV Subtest 3

Non-driver

       

-

Driver

       

-

  1. VF-14 Visual Function Index Test, ADEMd Adult Developmental Eye Movement test with distractors, UFOV Useful Field of View test, V vertical sheets, H horizontal sheet, Hd horizontal sheet with distractors, adj adjusted time (considering participants’ mistakes during the testing phase)
  2. **Correlation is significant at the p < .001 level (2-tailed)
  3. *Correlation is significant at the p < .05 level (2-tailed)