Traumatic Hyphaema: A report of 472 consecutive cases
© Ashaye; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 30 October 2007
Accepted: 26 November 2008
Published: 26 November 2008
Strategies for prevention of eye injuries require knowledge of the cause of the injuries. This study was done to determine the patient characteristics, the cause of injury, and where cases of traumatic hyphaema that necessitated admission to a tertiary hospital occurred. This may enable an appropriate intervention in the prevention of such injuries.
Retrospective case analysis of 472 patients with traumatic hyphaema admitted to the University College Hospital, Ibadan between January 1997 and December 2006.
The home was the single most frequent place of injury for all cases and for 75% of cases in children aged 0–10 years. Injuries that occurred at school comprised about one-fifth of cases. Sport-related injuries were uncommon.
The most common activities preceeding injuries were play, corporal punishment and assault. Stones, sticks and whiplash were the agents that caused traumatic hyphaema. Occupational-related hyphaema that caused injuries was mostly in farmers and artisans, few of whom used protective goggles. The majority of patients were males. Children and young adults aged ≤ 20 years comprised 63.6% of patients. A total of 336 (76%) eyes had at least one surgical intervention. While 298 (73.2%) patients had visual acuity (VA) less than 6/60 at presentation, 143 (37.0%) of eyes had visual acuity (VA) < 6/60 3 months after injury.
The injuries leading to traumatic hyphaema occur mostly at home and school, and frequently affect children and young adolescents. Over one-third resulted in blindness in the affected eye. The focus should be on prevention of stick-related eye injuries at these locations and improving access to eye health services for patients who sustained eye injuries.
The eyes are the third most common organs affected by injuries, next to the hands and feet , despite the fact that they represent only 0.27% of the total body area and 4% of the facial area. Eye injuries still remain one of the most common causes of unilateral blindness worldwide. Blunt eye injuries mostly result in traumatic hyphaema and are not an infrequent cause of presentation to the emergency units of many eye clinics [2–8]. Most result from unnecessary eye injuries, which are largely preventable.
Although eye injuries are a major public health problem globally, most studies have come from developed countries. Reports from developed countries suggest that severe eye injuries take place during work and leisure [3, 5, 7], but reports from developing countries are different[8, 9]. Besides, changing of lifestyles globally might have important effects on the patterns of blunt eye injuries.
This study was undertaken to provide information on the clinical and demographic data of patients admitted with traumatic hyphaema to the eye unit of University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, during a 10-year period, and to identify the cause and place of such injury. This information may help in the development of appropriate preventive measures.
This was a retrospective study of all patients with traumatic hyphaema due to closed globe injury, who were admitted to the eye ward of UCH, Ibadan, between January 1997 and December 2006. Ibadan is the capital city of Oyo State located in the South Western region of Nigeria (geographic coordinates 7°N, 23°E). The current population is estimated at 5.5 million. Oyo State covers a land area of 27.7 km2 and has an estimated population of 25 million . Ibadan is an ancient city, the home of the indigenous Yoruba people. Agriculture is the predominant occupation.
The eye department of UCH serves as a major referral center for emergency and specialised eye care in Ibadan and its surrounding smaller towns and villages. In Ibadan there is another public hospital and five private eye clinics that provide both emergency and regular eye care, but the majority of patients are seen at the UCH. Access to UCH is by referral but emergency cases are seen without referral.
Patients' data were abstracted from their case files. Such data were age, sex, cause and place of injury, activity at time of injury, duration of injury before presentation to UCH, and treatment received prior to presentation. Other data obtained were initial visual acuity (IVA) and final visual acuity (FVA) at 3 months. These data had been recorded in a standardized format as practiced in the hospital for all patients.
Other clinical data obtained were level of hyphema, based on the findings at slit lamp microscopy, intraocular pressure, direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Level of hyphema was graded as previously described . Grade 1, hyphema filling less than one third of the anterior chamber (AC); grade 2, hyphema filling one third to one half of the AC; grade 3, hyphema filling more than half of the AC, but less than the total; and grade 4, total hyphema with either red or black blood clots.
All patients were treated according to the standard eye department protocol for traumatic hyphema. The standard practice of management during this period of study was to admit all patients with traumatic hyphema, restrict activities, give cycloplegic eye drops (Guttae Atropine) and corticosteroid eye drops, with patching of the affected eye with a rigid shield. Eyes with raised intraocular pressure were treated with topical and systemic intraocular-pressure-lowering agents, commonly Guttae Timolol maleate, and oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Surgical evacuation of blood (paracentesis) was performed on all eyes with black ball hyphema, corneal stain and those with intraocular pressure uncontrolled with medication . Facilities for vitrectomy were not available at the time of study. A total of 336 patients (76.9%) had surgical evacuation of hyphema.
Subjects with penetrating eye injuries and non-traumatic hyphema were excluded from the study. Patients with traumatic hyphema with missing data or no follow-up and patients with follow-up of < 3 months (44 patients) were excluded from the analysis.
The follow-up data included the final corrected visual acuity (VA) and anterior and posterior segments complications. Final clinical outcome was defined as poor if visual acuity (VA) was less than 6/60. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program, using simple proportions to report the findings. Approval for this study was obtained from the Joint Ethical Review Board of the University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan.
During this study, 27% of all new patients presenting to the casualty room of this tertiary hospital with injuries of the head and neck had eye injuries alone or associated with other injuries. Of the patients with eye injuries, traumatic hyphema constituted 34.5% of all ocular and adnexial injuries that necessitating admission.
Characteristics of 472 Patients with Hyphaema
0 – 5
6 – 10
11 – 15
16 – 20
21 – 25
26 – 30
31 – 40
41 – 50
♦ Age range
4 to 55 years
♦ Mean age
14,50 years ± 7.3 years
♦ Affected Eye
♦ Surgical drainage
♦ No with IVA worse than 6/60
♦ No with FVA worse than 6/60
Duration of injury before presentation
No of patients
Less than 24 hours
1 – 3 days
4 – 7 days
8 – 14 days
> 14 days
Place of injury
Age groups (years)
0 – 10
11 – 20
21 – 30
Agents that caused traumatic hyphema varied and were mostly sticks and belts in 45.8% of cases (n = 216); stones or writing materials used as missiles were other causes (15%, n = 71). Others were fists/elbows (9.5%, n = 45), iron rod, pavement/walls (8.9%, n = 42), fruits (cocoa pods, palm fruits) (6.8%, n = 32), fireworks (2.5%, n = 12), footballs and squash ball (3.2%, n = 9). Others (6.3%, n = 30) were swings, bolts and screws, car bumpers, gun butts and police batons.
Activity at time of injury
Age groups (years)
0 – 10
11 – 20
21 – 30
Road Traffic accident
Final visual acuity at 3 months by place of injury
6/4 – 6/18
6/24 – 6/60
Other ocular findings in eyes with traumatic hyphaema
Lens – related problem
Optic nerve & retina
Traumatic hyphaema was a frequent presentation and accounted for a third of those who sustained eye injuries during the period of the study. Males were more affected than females, which is similar to reports from Western Europe, America, Asia and Africa [2–9]. There was however, a relatively higher proportion of females in this series compared to other reports from Western countries [2–7]. The male preponderance reported in Europe and North America varied. The male to female ratio of patients with traumatic hyphema in 184 cases who were over 30 years of age, reported by Edwards and Layden , was 3.1:1. Agapitos et al.  have reported a male to female ratio of 3.6:1 among children with hyphema. Jan and Khan  in Pakistan reported a male to female ratio of 8:1, and among Polish children, the ratio was 4.3:1.
In a culture in which women traditionally live a sheltered life, the results of this study were surprising. Urbanization and cultural and socioeconomic changes that expose women to greater risks of eye injuries may explain this finding. The excess risk of severe eye injuries affecting children observed in this study had been found in several previous studies [3, 5, 7–9, 11]; the older the children, the higher the risk of severe blunt injuries that result in hyphema .
Of 899 patients with an eye injury reported by Mela et al , 84% presented within 24 hours of injury or the day after, while only 7.8% patients in the present study reported for treatment within 24 hours of injury. This may be a reflection of the health service availability and/or poor patient awareness of what was available in the tertiary centre; these patients would rather have sought help elsewhere. This is corroborated by the finding that two-thirds of the patients studied admitted to having received treatment either from a chemist shop or a native doctor prior to presentation to the institution in which this study took place. The left eye was more commonly involved than the right. This may be a reflection of the fact that there are more right-handed people. Missiles or sticks used with the right hand are more likely to affect the left eye.
The home and school were the most common locations for serious eye injuries that result in hyphema, both accounting for two-thirds of the places where these injuries took place. This was the case particularly in children and adolescents. Several authors have similarly identified the home as the most common location for all types of injury [4–6], which reflects the amount of time spent in these locations, while others have reported work and sports places [11–13] to be common locations for eye injuries. The disproportionately higher figure of home- and school-related injuries in the present study may have been because of differences in population served by the hospital of study, the selective use of hospital services by children and adolescents with severe eye injuries, or a higher risk for blunt injuries for these groups in our population.
More than half of all injuries in children were as a result of intentional actions. The group chiefly at risk from thrown missiles was the 0–10 year group (30.1% of the total). Unlike in the present study, Niiraen and Ilka  have found that 50% of injuries were caused by other children, while a third was self-inflicted. These reported injuries took place in the absence of a caregiver. A higher number of injuries occurs during the holiday months when adult supervision is often reduced. Whereas in developed countries, toys are a common cause of injuries in the younger age groups, stones, wood, corn cobs, sticks and writing materials were often the agents of injury. Corporal punishments with sticks and belts by parents, teachers and guardians constituted over 20% of the activities that resulted in hyphema in our study. None of the children studied received their eye injuries from toys. Sticks and belts were used to beat offending children and adolescents. This is an additional risk for injuries at home and schools. Traumatic hyphema in children and adolescents secondary to corporal punishment is infrequently reported. Calzada and Kerr  reported seven cases, but there was no significant loss of vision, as there was in the present study.
In the adults, hyphema-inducing injuries result from different causes. In the study of McEwen , 69.9% of injuries were work-related, while 18.3% were sports-related. Tools and machinery either at home or the workplace were the agents of eye injuries in the study of Baker et al. . In the present study, injuries in adults occurred in the streets, at home or at work. Activity preceeding such injuries (Table 4) were assaults or were related to work. Intentional assaults following arguments or disputes constituted a significant proportion of injuries in the group studied. A more economically friendly environment, improved employment rate and behaviour modification may reduce such injuries.
The low occurrence of sports injuries in our population suggest the low priority given to sports, and this may be due to poor information about its benefit. In recent studies from developed countries, sports related injuries have become the most common in adults [4, 12, 15–18], whereas work-related eye injuries used to predominate. With enforcement of appropriate legislation, work-related eye injuries have been reduced. However, increasing prosperity that makes more time available for sports and increased awareness of the health benefits of sports have increased sports injuries, up to 68% in some studies [16–18].
Work-related injuries may have been underrepresented in adults because closed eye injuries that cause hyphema were studied, whereas work-related eye injuries in a predominantly agricultural population are expected to result in penetrating eye injuries, as reported by Abraham et al. in Tanzania . Also the rural farmer may have had limited access to the health facility where this study took place.
The visual outcome in patients who presented with traumatic hyphema was poor in 37% of cases. Only a third of patients in the present study, compared to 96% in those reported by Shiucy and Lucarelli  and 75% of those reported by Kearns , achieved visual acuity of 6/18 or better. This visual outcome is worse than in other patients in North America  Europe [16, 17], but is similar to reports from Asia and other parts of Africa [8, 9]. This may have been due to several factors. In a setting as ours, patients with hyphema presenting to hospital were likely to have severe injuries; therefore a higher proportion of those with poor visual outcome may be related to the severity of injury or the presence of other risk factors for poor outcome. Known risk factors for poor visual outcome following hyphema are delay in presentation [7–9], level of hyphema at presentation [8, 11–16], associated eye damage [17, 18] and abnormal hemoglobinopathy [21–24], all of which are prevalent in the study population. The latter was not routinely determined in our patients for cost reasons.
Patients with total or blackball hyphema made up about half of the group seen in the present study, similar to report Pakistan and Nigeria [8, 9], but different from that reported by Edward and Layden . In the latter study, only 15% of patients had grade 3 or more hyphema, while none of the 316 cases of hyphema reported by Agapitos et al.  had full hyphema. Our visual outcome was similar to that reported by Amoni and Jan [8, 9], but different from outcomes in Western countries. The level of hyphema is an indicator of the severity of injury, which supports the likelihood that more severe eye injuries were presented to University College Hospital, Ibadan.
Traumatic hyphema on its own is well recognized as a serious and often vision-threatening sequela of blunt eye trauma. Hyphema may occur in isolation or more often with damage to other sites within the eye. Eyes with poor visual outcome were found to have such associated injuries in the present study. The higher rate of surgical intervention than that reported elsewhere suggests the presence of risk factors for higher intraocular pressure (IOP) and reduced egression of blood from the anterior chamber.
The findings of this study highlight that the home and school are locations in which closed globe injuries that result in hyphema occur. Such injuries still result in vision loss in about a third of cases. Unsupervised play by children and intentional actions by adults, such as corporal punishment, contributed to the increase in risk for blunt eye injuries. Differentially, females are more exposed to these injuries compared to those reported in Western countries. Prevention of blunt eye injuries requires education of children and their care givers on the potential dangers within the home and schools. Simple measures such as education, enforcement of legislation, public campaign against corporal punishment and unsupervised play could reduce these severe closed globe injuries in the communities affected. Targeted interventions to reduce stick injuries in this specific population may be needed. These prevention methods should be disseminated widely through the media, schools and all health institutions.
The authors acknowledge the contribution of Dr EA Bamgboye in analyzing the data.
- Nordberg E: Injuries as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology and prospects for control. East Afr Med J. 2000, 77 (12 suppl): 1-43.Google Scholar
- Edwards WC, Layden WE: Traumatic hyphema: A report of 184 consecutive cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973, 75: 110-116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agapitos PJ, Leon-Paul N, Clarke WN: Traumatic hyphema in children. Ophthalmology. 1987, 94 (10): 1238-1241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luksza L, Homziuk M, Nowakowska-Klimek M, Glasner L, Iwaszkiewicz-Bilikiewicz B: Traumatic hyphema caused by eye injuries. Klin Oczna. 2005, 107: 250-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McEwen CJ, Baires PS, Desai P: Eye injuries in children: the current picture. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999, 83: 933-936. 10.1136/bjo.83.8.933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Collet B: Traumatic hyphema, a review. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982, 14 (1): 52-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spoor TC, Kwitko GM, O'Grady JM, Ramocki JMl: Traumatic hyphema in an urban population. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990, 109: 23-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amoni SS: Traumatic hyphema in Kaduna, Nigeria. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1981, 65: 439-444. 10.1136/bjo.65.6.439.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jan S, Khan S, Mohammad S: Hyphema due to blunt trauma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003, 13 (7): 398-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- National population census, Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2005Google Scholar
- Yospaiboon Y, Sangveejit J, Suwanwatana C: Traumatic hyphema: clinical study of 149 cases. J Med Assoc Thai. 1989, 72 (9): 520-526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mela EK, Dvorak GJ, Mantzouranis GA, Giakoumis AP, Blatsios G, Andrikopoulos GK, Gartaganis SP: Ocular trauma in a Greek population: Review of 899 cases resulting in hospitalization. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2005, 12: 185-190. 10.1080/09286580590964801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham DI, Vitale SI, West SI, Isseme I: Epidemiology of eye injuries in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 1999, 6 (2): 85-94. 10.1076/opep.126.96.36.1990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niiranen M, Ilka R: Eye injuries in children. Br J Ophthal. 1981, 65: 436-438. 10.1136/bjo.65.6.436.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calzada JI, Kerr NC: Traumatic hyphema in children secondary to corporal punishment with a belt. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003, 135 (5): 719-720. 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01890-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McEwen CJ: Eye Injuries: a prospective survey of 5671 eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989, 73 (II): 888-894. 10.1136/bjo.73.11.888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baker RS, Wilson MR, Flowers CW, Lee DA, Wheeler NC: Demographic factors in a population – based survey of hospitalized, work – related ocular injury. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996, 122 (2): 213-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai JC, Fekrat S, Barrün Y, Goldberg MF: Traumatic hyphema in children: risk factors for complications. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119 (1): 64-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiucy Y, Lucarelli MJ: Traumatic hyphema: outcome of outpatient management. Ophthalmology. 1998, 105 (5): 851-855. 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)95025-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kearns P: Traumatic hyphema: a retrospective study of 314 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991, 75 (3): 137-141. 10.1136/bjo.75.3.137.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nasrullah A, Kerr NC: Sickle cell trait as a risk factor for secondary haemorrhage in children with traumatic hyphema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997, 123 (6): 783-790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho J, Jun BK, Lee YJ, Uhm KB: Factors associated with poor final visual outcome after traumatic hyphema. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1998, 12 (2): 122-129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viestenz A, Kuchie M: Retrospective analysis of 417 cases of contusion and replacement of globe with frequent avoidance causes of trauma: the Eriargen Ocular Contusion – Registry (EOCR). Klin Monat sbl Augen Heilkd. 2001, 218 (10): 662-669. 10.1055/s-2001-18388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Desai P, McEwen CJ, Baines P, Minassian DC: Epidemiology and implications of ocular trauma admitted to hospital in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996, 50 (4): 436-441. 10.1136/jech.50.4.436.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/24/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.