Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Barrett |
27 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Wensveen |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gladys Mitchell |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Barrett |
2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gladys Mitchell |
3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Wensveen |
14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-11-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.