Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Barrett |
| 27 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Wensveen |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gladys Mitchell |
| 19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brendan Barrett |
| 2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gladys Mitchell |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Wensveen |
| 14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-11-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.