From: Diagnostic techniques for inflammatory eye disease: past, present and future: a review
 | Infective agent | Assay | n (patients in studies) | Validity* | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruokuonen et al. | Rubella (in FHI) | Aqueous IgG | 63 | 100.0% | [35] |
Aqueous PCR | 20 | 10.0% | |||
Suzuki et al. | Rubella (in FHI) | GWC (> 3) | 14 | 71.4% | [36] |
Aqueous PCR | 9 | 22.2% | |||
Quentin et al. | Rubella (in FHI) | AI (≥ 1.5) | 52 | 100.0% | [37] |
Aqueous PCR | 28 | 17.9% | |||
Ang et al. | TB | IGRA (T-SPOT.TB) | 162 | Sp 75.0%, Sen 36.0% | [48] |
TST | Â | Sp 51.1%, Sen 72.0% | |||
TST + T-SPOT.TB |  | OR 2.16 (95% CI, 1.23-3.80) | |||
De Groot-Mijnes et al. | HSV | PCR / GWC + | 13 | 46.2% | [50] |
 | GWC + |  | 46.2% | ||
VZV | PCR / GWC + | 16 | 62.5% | ||
 | GWC + |  | 25.0% | ||
Toxoplasma | PCR / GWC + | 25 | 28.0% | ||
 | GWC + |  | 64.0% | ||
Kiljstra et al. / Rothova et al. | Toxoplasma | GWC | 22-30 | 72.7%-93.3% | |
Talabani et al. | Toxoplasma | PCR + immunoblotting | 54 | Sen 73% | [55] |
GWC + immunoblotting |  | Sen 70% | |||
PCR + GWC |  | Sen 80% | |||
PCR + GWC + immunoblotting |  | Sen 85% | |||
Villard et al. | Toxoplasma | ELISA | 19 | Sp 85% | [56] |
Immunoblotting | 19 | Sp 85% | |||
PCR | 18 | Sp 100% | |||
Dabil et al. | CMV, VZV, HSV, Toxoplasma | Multiplex PCR | 21 | 85.7% | [61] |
Multiplex PCR | Â | 71.4% (loss of <1 log sensitivity) |