Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Lloyd |
23 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Zehetner |
17 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Poku |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Lloyd |
2 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Poku |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Zehetner |
24 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Publishing | ||
26 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-13-74 |
You can find further information about peer review here.