Peer Review reports
From: Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guilin Zhan |
| 13 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eve Higginbotham |
| 9 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 31 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guilin Zhan |
| 23 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eve Higginbotham |
| 23 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Mauricio Paolera |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Jun 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jun 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-8-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.