Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of prospective comparative studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

First author

Year

Location

Design

Follow-up

Intervention

No. of eyes

Mean age(y)

Preoperative central corneal sensitivity

Preoperative SE(D)

Li(a)

2014

China

Non-randomized

6 m

FS-LASIK

33

27.33 ± 6.58

57.27 ± 6.26

NA

     

SMILE

38

28.21 ± 7.04

58.16 ± 3.37

NA

Wei

2013

China

Non-randomized

3 m

FS-LASIK

54

25.44 ± 7.15

58.1 ± 4.3

NA

     

SMILE

61

27.44 ± 6.52

56.6 ± 4.5

NA

Demirok

2013

Turkey

Randomized

6 m

FS-LASIK

28

26.2 ± 4.4

56.2 ± 5.0

4.00 ± 1.40

     

SMILE

28

26.2 ± 4.4

56.8 ± 4.7

3.90 ± 1.50

Gao

2014

China

Non-randomized

3 m

FS-LASIK

32

22.75 ± 4.28

57.66 ± 3.25

NA

     

SMILE

15

24.53 ± 4.05

58.48 ± 2.84

NA

Li(b)

2013

China

Non-randomized

6 m

FS-LASIK

42

28.3 ± 5.5

58.06 ± 3.8

8.46 ± 2.15

     

SMILE

32

27.1 ± 4.0

58.26 ± 4.5

6.56 ± 1.28

  1. The results were performed as Mean ± SD
  2. FS-LASIK femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis, SMILE small incision lenticule extraction, y year, SE spherical equivalent, D diopter, m month, NA not available