Skip to main content

Table 1 MINORS for assessing quality of included studies

From: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

Methodological item for non-randomized studies

Matsumura et al [22]

Baba et al [23]

Sasaki et al [24]

Chen et al [25]

1. A clearly stated aim

2

2

2

2

2. Inclusion of consecutive patients

2

2

2

2

3. Prospective collection of data

0

0

0

0

4. Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study

2

2

2

2

5. Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint

0

0

0

0

6. Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study

2

2

2

2

7. Loss to follow up less than 5%

2

2

2

2

8. Prospective calculation of the study size

0

0

0

0

9. An adequate control group

2

2

2

2

10. Contemporary groups

0

0

0

0

11. Baseline equivalence of groups

2

2

2

2

12. Adequate statistical analyses

2

2

2

2

Total score

16

16

16

18