Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of prevalence and risk factors of undercorrected refractive error between the present study and various published studies

From: Prevalence and associated risk factors of undercorrected refractive errors among people with diabetes in Shanghai

Study

Sample Size

Population

Age

Undercorrection in Study Population (%)

Undercorrection among Participants with Refractive Error (%)

Definitions

Multivariate Risk Factors

Present study

649

Diabetes Chinese

Mean: 68.37 ± 8.22

Range: 60–100

16.63%

10.96% of hyperopia subjects

23.40% of myopic subjects

Presenting visual acuity <20/40(Best-corrected VA -Presenting VA) ≥2 lines improvement

Older age, female gender, non-farmer, myopia, lens opacities status, DR, lower BMI, poor glycaemic control, not wearing spectacles

Hong Kong Correctable Visual Impairment Study [4]

2301

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mean: 61.4 ± 10.5

Range: 23–92

7.30%

NA

Presenting VA <6/18 that improved to no impairment (≥6/18) after refractive correction

Older age, more advanced stage of DR

Tanjong Pagar Survey [9]

1152

General Singaporean

Chinese

40–79

21.7%

NA

Presenting VA <20/40 in the better eye (Best-corrected VA- Presenting VA) ≥2 lines improvement

Older age, lower education level, not wearing spectacles, cataracts

SiMES [15]

3115

General Singaporean

Malays

Mean: 58 ± 11

Range: 40–80

20.4%

28.7% of hyperopia subjects

28.9% of myopic subjects

Presenting VA <20/40 in the better eye (Best-corrected VA- Presenting VA) ≥2 lines improvement

Older age, female sex, lower education level

Shihpai Eye Study [16]

1361

General Chinese

Mean: 72.2

Range: ≥65

9.55%

11.3% of hyperopic subjects

34.4% of myopic subjects

Presenting VA < 20/40 in the better eye (Best-corrected VA -Presenting VA) ≥2 lines improvement in better eye

Older age, non-emmetropic eye, not wearing spectacles and lower level of education

LALES [17]

6129

General Latinos

Mean: 54.9 ± 10.8

Range: ≥40

15.1%

NA

(Best-corrected VA-presenting VA) ≥2 lines improvement in better eye

Older age, lack of health insurance, lower education level, lower BMI, being unemployed

BMES [18]

3654

General Caucasians

Mean: 66.2

Range: 49–97

10.2%

53.9% of hyperopic subjects

12.7% of myopic subjects

Presenting VA <20/40 (Best-corrected VA - presenting VA) improvement of ≥2 lines in the better eye

Older age, living alone, occupations of trade and labourer, receipt of a government pension, hyperopia and duration from the last eye examination

  1. NA not available