Real-world refractive outcomes of toric intraocular lens implantation in a United Kingdom National Health Service setting

Table 2 Comparison of toric IOL implantation studies

Study	Eyes	Age (years ±SD or range)	Toric IOL	Post-op UVA (logMAR) ± SD	Pre-op cyl (D) ± SD	Post-op cyl (D) ± SD	Max IOL rotation (°)
This study	32	66.6 ± 14.5	Tecnis Toric (n = 27), Rayner T-flex (n = 2), Alcon Acrysof toric (n = 3)	0.16 ± 0.12	2.45 ± 1.2	1.04 ± 0.79	30
Tsinpoulos et al. [10]	29	63 ± 5.4	Alcon Acrysof toric	≥0.30 (90%)	2.38 ± 0.91	0.64 ± 0.61	8.4
Tsinpoulos et al. [10]	29	63 ± 5.4	Alcon Acrysof toric	≥0.10 (66%)	2.38 ± 0.91	0.64 ± 0.61	8.4
Hirnschall et al [9]	30	67 (36–85)	Tecnis Toric	−0.05	1.80 ± 0.50	0.90 ± 0.40	13.7
Entabi et al. [11]	33	81 ± 8.9	Rayner T-flex	0.28 ± 0.23	3.35 ± 1.20	0.95 ± 0.66	17

ISSN: 1471-2415