Peer Review reports
From: The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Sep 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antony Law |
| 6 Sep 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Amparo |
| 23 Oct 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Zequan Xu |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Oct 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Nov 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antony Law |
| 23 Nov 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Amparo |
| 27 Dec 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Zequan Xu |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Dec 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Jan 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Amparo |
| 19 Jan 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antony Law |
| 25 Jan 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Zequan Xu |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Jan 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antony Law |
| 21 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Amparo |
| 5 Mar 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Zequan Xu |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 Mar 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 7 Mar 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Zequan Xu |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 7 Mar 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Mar 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Mar 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0 |
You can find further information about peer review here.