Comparison of two techniques for toric intraocular lens implantation: hydroimplantation versus ophthalmic viscosurgical devices

Table 1 Demographic data at baseline

Variables	OVD group	Hydroimplantation group	P value
Number	30	30
Gender (M/F)	10/15	11/17	0.480
Age (years)	69.53 ± 10.33	67.53 ± 9.14	0.513
UCVA (logMAR)	0.93 ± 0.25	0.81 ± 0.14	0.536
BCVA (logMAR)	0.67 ± 0.24	0.68 ± 0.22	0.483
ECD (cells/mm²)	2418.66 ± 322.97	2529.71 ± 317.50	0.939
IOP (mmHg)	16.15 ± 2.48	15.29 ± 2.31	0.803
Refractive astigmatism (D)	2.29 ± 0.44	2.10 ± 0.42	0.804
Toric IOL model, n (%)
T3	9 (30.0)	11 (36.7)
T4	9 (30.0)	8 (26.7)
T5	11 (36.7)	10 (33.3)
T6	1 (3.3)	1 (3.3)

OVD ophthalmic viscosurgical device, UCVA uncorrected visual acuity, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, ECD endothelial cell density, IOP intraocular pressure, D diopters

ISSN: 1471-2415