Skip to main content

Table 3 Gender, age, family income, education, medical insurance type, commute, satisfaction, awareness, district of patients accepted and unaccepted cataract surgery

From: General analysis of factors influencing cataract surgery practice in Shanghai residents

 

Cataract surgery history

 

Yes

No

P value

n = 404

n = 1830

Gender [n(%)]

  

0.0127

 Male

143 (15.6%)

771 (84.4%)

 

 Female

261 (19.8%)

1059 (80.2%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Age [n(%)]

  

< 0.0001

 50- < 60

30 (14.6%)

176 (85.4%)

 

 60- < 70

94 (12.8%)

638 (87.2%)

 

 70- < 80

133 (17.8%)

614 (82.2%)

 

  ≥ 80

147(26.8%)

402 (73.2%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Disposable family Income per month [n(%)]

  

0.5624

  < 1000 RMB

8 (11.6%)

61 (88.4%)

 

 1000–2999 RMB

207 (18.4%)

918 (81.6%)

 

 3000–4999 RMB

124 (18.2%)

556 (81.8%)

 

  ≥ 5000 RMB

65 (18.1%)

295 (81.9%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Education [n(%)]

  

0.0323

 illiteracy

70 (16.9%)

344 (83.1%)

 

 Primary school

103 (19.5%)

424 (80.5%)

 

 middle school

179 (16.6%)

902 (83.4%)

 

 College and above

52 (24.5%)

160 (75.5%)

 

 Total

404 (17.7%)

1830 (82.3%)

 

Medical Insurance [n(%)]

  

0.0363

 No insurance

1 (5.6%)

17 (94.4%)

 

 Urban medical insurance

372 (18.9%)

1593 (81.1%)

 

 Rural medical insurance

21 (11.9%)

156 (88.1%)

 

 Non-local medical insurance

10 (13.5%)

64 (86.5%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Transfer times [n(%)]

  

0.0115

 0

181 (15.7%)

970 (84.3%)

 

 1

164 (20.7%)

630 (79.3%)

 

  ≥ 2

59 (20.4%)

230 (79.6%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Satisfaction about facilities of hospitals nearby [n(%)]

  

0.0319

 Very satisfied

118 (21.1%)

441 (78.9%)

 

 Other

286 (17.1%)

1389 (82.9%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

Satisfaction about service of hospitals nearby [n(%)]

  

0.0048

 Very satisfied

127 (22.0%)

451 (78.0%)

 

 Other

277 (16.7%)

1379 (83.3%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

District [n(%)]

  

0.0004

 Rural

181 (15.4%)

998 (84.6%)

 

 Urban

223 (21.1%)

832 (78.9%)

 

 Total

404 (17.8%)

1830 (82.2%)

 

aAwareness evaluation score

  

< 0.0001

 Mean (standard deviation)

55.0 (23.4)

38.8 (24.2)

 
 

404

1830

 
  1. Pearson Chi-square (χ2) test and atype III ANOVA test were used for qualitative and quantitative variables separately