Peer Review reports
From: Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Aug 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Sugar |
| 21 Aug 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Georgios Labiris |
| 24 Aug 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Debora Goetz Goldberg |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 Aug 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Sep 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Sugar |
| 24 Sep 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Georgios Labiris |
| 22 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Debora Goetz Goldberg |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Debora Goetz Goldberg |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Oct 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Nov 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12886-018-0963-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.