Charts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|
Nos | 12 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 74 | 6 | 45 | 5 | 7 | 16 | 73 |
×
|
×
|
Read correctly | 850 | 840 | 811 | 833 | 728 | 822 | 689 | 825 | 803 | 830 | 834 | 823 | 566 | 802 | 801 |
Misread | – | 1 | 29 | 5 | 105 | 8 | 131 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 269 | 1 | 3 |
RGB no. | 12 | 3 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 21 |
×
|
×
|
×
|
×
|
×
|
×
| 5 | 45 |
RGB Read | – | 9 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 28 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 47 | 46 |
C.weaknes | – | – | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Chart nos | Nos | Read correctly | Misread | Strong deutans | Strong protans |
16 | 26 | 832 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
17 | 42 | 836 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
- Legend: Nos (Numbers written in the color chart); X (Can’t read any number); Read Correctly (Number of children who read correctly); Misread (who missed the normal number); RGB no (Red Green Blind Number) → numbers that must be read by Red Green Blind Subjects; RGB read (number of children who read RGB numbers); and C. weakness (Color weakness)
- As indicated in Table 3, for plate number 3 as an example, there were 811 students with normal color vision to read plate number 3 as 29 and there were 29 students who misread this plate. There were 8 red green deficient students who read plate number 3 as 70 instead of 29 and there were 2 individuals who were unable to read any number in this plate (color weakness). For chart numbers 16 and 17, there were 9 students who read plate 16 as 2 instead of 26, and plate 17 as 4 instead of 42. These students are strong deuteranopes. There were 4 students who read plate 16 as 6 instead of 26 and plate 17 as 2 instead of 42. These individuals are strong protanopes. There were 832 students who read correctly plate 16 as 26 and there were 5 students who misread this plate. There were 836 students who read plate 17 correctly as 42 and there was 1 student who misread it
