Skip to main content

Table 5 Primary outcomes from baseline (2 years) – Change in axial length

From: Efficacy and safety of interventions to control myopia progression in children: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Outcome

Comparison

Number of subjects (primary studies)

Measure of effect (95% CI)

Direction of effect

I2 (%)

Change in axial length

Undercorrected versus fully corrected spectacles

94 (1)

MD = 0.06 (− 0.04 to 0.16)

Favours full correction

N/A

Bifocal spectacles versus single vision lens spectacles

89 (1)

MD = − 0.20 (− 0.31 to − 0.09)

Favours bifocal spectacles

N/A

1% atropine versus placebo

400 (1)

MD = − 0.36 (− 0.43 to − 0.29)

Favours atropine

N/A

2% pirenzepine gel versus placebo

74 (1)

MD = − 0.12 (− 0.29 to 0.05)

Favours pirenzepine

N/A

RGPCLs versus spectacles or SCLs

394 (2)

MD = 0.03 (− 0.05 to 0.12)

Favours spectacles or SCLs

0

Concentric ring bifocal SCLs versus SVSCLs

128 (1)

MD = − 0.12 (− 0.20 to − 0.04)

Favours concentric ring bifocal SCLs

N/A

Peripheral add multifocal SCLs versus SVLs

99 (2)

MD = − 0.13 (− 0.20 to − 0.06)

Favours peripheral add multifocal SCLs

0

ΟΚ versus SCLs or SVLs

663 (11)

MD = − 0.27 (− 0.31 to − 0.23)

Favours OK

0

PALs versus SVLs

791 (3)

MD = −0.10 (− 0.20 to 0.00)

Favours PALs

78

  1. CI confidence interval, N/A not applicable, OK Orthokeratology, PALs progressive addition lenses, RGPCLs rigid gas permeable contact lenses, SCLs soft contact lenses, SVLs single vision lenses, SVSCLs single vision soft contact lenses