Skip to main content

Table 3 Quantitative pupillometry data reported by previous studies presented in comparison with this study

From: Establishing a normative database for quantitative pupillometry in the pediatric population

Study

n

Ages (years)

Light conditions

MAX

(mm)

MIN (mm)

CON (%)

LAT (ms)

ACV (mm/s)

MCV

(mm/s)

ADV (mm/s)

T75

(s)

Asymmetry

This paper

196 eyes (101 patients)

1–18

Scotopic

6.6 ± 0.08

4.7 ± 0.8

30% ± 6%

230 ± 35

3.70 ± 0.75

−5.02 ± 0.90

0.88 ± 0.25

2.82 ± 0.66

15.8% ≥ 0.5 mm

Taylor et al. [5]

2432 paired measurements (310 patients)

1–87

Ambient light

4.1 ± 0.34

2.7 ± 0.21

34%

240 ± 40

1.48 ± 0.33

   

< 1% > 0.5 mm

Boev et al. [4]

90 eyes (90 patients)

0–18

Ambient light

4.11

2.65

36%

 

2.34

 

2.2

 

“Normal” < 0.5 mm

Kohnen et al. [12]

166 eyes (83 patients)

6.01 ± 4.11

2 min dark adaptation

6.09 ± 0.98

       

9.64% ≥ 0.5 mm

Brown et al. [11]

201 eyes

1–18

 

5.36 ± 0.90

3.62 ± 0.65

   

4.92 (W)

4.42 (AA)

   

Fan et al. [14]

25 patients

18–22

Photopic and scotopic

5.93 ± 0.75 (M,P) 5.53 ± 0.57 (F, P) 6.72 ± 0.86 (M, S) 6.42 ± 0.68 (F, S)

        

Tekin et al. [15]

20 eyes (20 patients)

25 eyes (25 patients)

0–10

11–20

Scotopic

2.4 ± 1.1

2.4 ± 1.1

 

55 ± 7%

57 ± 6%

262 ± 37

242 ± 48

6.1 ± 0.6

6.2 ± 1.0

 

2.4 ± 1.1

2.4 ± 1.0

  
  1. n Number of measurements, MAX Maximum diameter, MIN Minimum diameter, CON Constriction percentage, LAT Latency, ACV Average constriction velocity, MCV Maximum constriction velocity, ADV Average dilation velocity, T75 75% recovery time; (M,P) Male, photopic, F,P Female, photopic, M,S Male scotopic, F,S Female, scotopic, W White, AA, African-american