From: Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases
LVA | WHO Grade 1–2 (n = 28) | WHO Grade 3–4 (n = 6) | P |
---|---|---|---|
No LVAs | 11% [3] | – | 0.93a |
Insufficient LVAs | 18% [5] | 33.3% [2] | 0.21a |
Optical LVAs | 89% [24] | 83.3% [5] | 0.55a |
 Quantity per patient | 1 [1,6] | 1 [0,2] | 0.46b |
Electronic LVAs | 25% [6] | 88.3% [5] | 0.01a |
 Quantity per patient | 0 [0,3] | 1 [0,3] | 0.04b |
 CCTV | 14% [4] | 66.7% [4] | 0.02a |
 p-EVES | 14% [4] | 50% [3] | 0.09a |
Consumer electronics | 46% [12] | 83.3% [5] | 0.18a |
 Quantity per patient | 0 [0,4] | 1 [0,2] | 0.34b |
 Smartphone | 46% [12] | 83.3% [5] | 0.18a |
 Tablet | 21% [40] | 50% [3] | 0.31a |
 Camera | 14% [4] | – | 0.77a |
Cut-off filter glasses | 25% [6] | 16.7% [1] | 0.66a |