Skip to main content

Table 5 Analysis of the factors predicting anatomic success in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment group

From: Clinical characteristics and prognosis of Total Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a matched case-control study

 

Attatched

(n = 33)

Redetached

(n = 11)

P-value

Age (yr)

47.82

63.45

0.013a

Lens status (n, %)

  

0.005b

 Phakia

23 (69.7%)

2 (18.2%)

 

 Pseudophakia

10 (33.3%)

9 (81.8%)

 

High myopia (n, %)

  

0.263c

 No

25 (75.8%)

6 (54.5%)

 

 Yes

8 (24.2%)

5 (45.5%)

 

PVR (n, %)

  

1.000c

 No

21 (63.6%)

7 (63.6%)

 

 Yes

12 (36.4%)

4 (36.4%)

 

Trauma (n, %)

  

0.412b

 No

25 (75.8%)

10 (90.9%)

 

 Yes

8 (24.2%)

1 (0.9%)

 

Macular hole (n, %)

  

0.002b

 No

32 (97.0%)

6 (54.5%)

 

 Yes

1 (3%)

5 (45.5%)

 

Number of break (n, %)

  

0.741c

 Single

20 (60.6%)

6 (54.5%)

 

 Multiple

13 (39.4%)

5 (45.5%)

 

Break location (n, %)

  

0.343b

 Superior

18 (54.5%)

8 (72.7%)

 

 Inferior

7 (21.2%)

0 (0.0%)

 

 Both superior and inferior

8 (24.2%)

3 (27.3%)

 

Type of surgery (n, %)

  

0.981b

 Vitrectomy only

28 (84.8%)

10 (90.9%)

 

 Vitrectomy with SB

5 (15.2%)

1 (9.1%)

 

Tamponade (n, %)

 Gas (SF6, C3F8)

16 (48.5%)

7 (63.6%)

0.381c

 Silicone oil

17 (51.5%)

4 (36.4%)

 
  1. C3F8 Perfluoropropane; SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride; PVR Proliferative vitreoretinopathy; SB scleral buckling
  2. Significant P values are expressed in bold characters
  3. aindependent t test
  4. bfisher’s exact test
  5. cchi-square test