Skip to main content

Table 2 SAM Suitability Ratings by Organization

From: Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration

 

Institution/Organization

Total PEMs

Not Suitable

Adequate

Superior

1

NIH National Eye Institute

6

0 (0%)

4 (67%)

2 (33%)

2

American Macular Degeneration Foundation

12

8 (67%)

4 (33%)

0 (0%)

3

American Academy of Ophthalmology

5

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

4

NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine

4

0 (0%)

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

5

UC Irvine Health MD Partnership

9

2 (22%)

6 (67%)

1 (11%)

6

Foundation Fighting Blindness

4

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

0 (0%)

7

American Printing House for the Blind

9

4 (44%)

5 (56%)

0 (0%)

8

Prevent Blindness

5

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

9

Merck Manual Patient Education

2

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

10

Bright Focus Foundation

15

0 (0%)

14 (93%)

1 (7%)

11

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education/Research

5

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

1 (20%)

12

Macular Degeneration Foundation

11

1 (9%)

10 (91%)

0 (0%)

13

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

3

1 (33%)

2 (67%)

0 (0%)

14

Macular Degeneration Support

2

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

15

Lighthouse Guild

2

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

16

Macular Society

6

3 (50%)

3 (50%)

0 (0%)

Total/Mean Scores

n = 100

23 (23%)

62 (62%)

15 (15%)

  1. Interpretation of SAM scores: 0–39% - Not Suitable; 40–69% - Adequate; 70–100% - Superior