Factors affecting final functional outcomes in open‐globe injuries and use of ocular trauma score as a predictive tool in Nepalese population

Table 4 OTS predicted visual outcome and comparison to final visual outcome

OTS Group	NPL			LP/HM			1/60 - 5/60			6/60 - 6/15			>= 6/12
OTS Group	OTS [%]	Final [%]	p * value	OTS [%]	Final [%]	p * value	OTS [%]	Final [%]	p* value	OTS [%]	Final [%]	p* value	OTS [%]	Final [%]	p* value
1	74	75	*>0.05*	15	25	<0.05	7	0	<0.05	3	0	*>0.05*	1	0	*>0.05*
2	27	22.2	*>0.05*	26	38.9	<0.05	18	27.8	<0.05	15	11.1	*>0.05*	15	0	<0.05
3	2	0	*>0.05*	11	16.1	*>0.05*	15	22.6	*>0.05*	31	32.3	*>0.05*	41	29	<0.05
4	1	0	*>0.05*	2	0	*>0.05*	3	0	*>0.05*	22	50	<0.05	73	50	<0.05
5	0	0	*>0.05*	1	0	*>0.05*	1	0	*>0.05*	5	0	<0.05	94	100	<0.05

NPL No light perception, LP Light perception, HM Hand movements, OTS Ocular trauma score
^*Z-test for proportion

ISSN: 1471-2415