From: Treatment outcomes of retinal vein occlusion in clinical practice in Nepal
CRVO (n = 39) | BRVO (n = 60) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Eyes with presenting VA ≤0.3 logMAR | |||
Eyes, n (%) | 4 (10) | 12 (20) | 0.05 |
Baseline VA logMAR, mean (SD) | 0.28 (0.05) | 0.18 (0.13) | 0.5 |
Final VA logMAR, mean (SD)* | 0.54 (0.83) | 0.22 (0.25) | 0.71 |
Change VA logMAR*, mean (95% CI) | 0.26 (−1.04, 1.57) | 0.03 (−0.13, 0.2) | 0.61 |
Baseline CST μm, mean (SD) | 423 (152) | 330 (102) | 0.31 |
Final CST μm, mean (SD)* | 268 (50) | 230 (110) | 0.46 |
Change CST μm*, mean (95% CI) | − 155 (− 390, 80) | − 79 (− 206, 48) | 0.42 |
Injectionsα, median (Q1, Q3) | 0.5 (0, 1.5) | 0 (0, 1.2) | 0.94 |
Additional Macular Laser, n | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Additional Triamcinolone, n | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Additional PRP, n | 1 | 5 | 1 |
Eyes with presenting VA ≤0.3 logMAR | |||
Eyes, n (%) | 35 (90) | 48 (80) | |
Baseline VA logMAR, mean (SD) | 1.22 (0.57) | 0.89 (0.34) | 0.02 |
Final VA logMAR, mean (SD)* | 0.97 (0.74) | 0.44 (0.42) | < 0.001 |
Change VA logMAR*, mean (95% CI) | −0.26 (−0.49, −0.03) | −0.44 (−0.57, − 0.32) | 0.15 |
Baseline CST μm, mean (SD) | 531 (218) | 449 (153) | 0.07 |
Final CST μm, mean (SD)* | 355 (168) | 291 (137) | 0.12 |
Change CST μm*, mean (95% CI) | − 188 (− 294, −82) | −120 (−206, −34) | 0.30 |
Injectionsα, median (Q1, Q3) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) | 0.72 |
Additional Macular Laser, n | 0 | 2 | 0.5 |
Additional Triamcinolone, n | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Additional PRP/Sectoral Laser, n | 15 | 10 | 0.05 |