Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparative study of combined vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone for primary full-thickness macular hole repair

Original Submission
18 Oct 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olufemi Oderinlo
24 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olufemi Oderinlo
3 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 7
27 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
2 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christophe Valmaggia
Resubmission - Version 8
2 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 8
11 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olufemi Oderinlo
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
19 Mar 2021 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12886-021-01918-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page