Skip to main content

Table 2 Gender differences in signed and absolute prediction errors

From: Gender differences in refraction prediction error of five formulas for cataract surgery

 

Overall (n = 8431)

Mean (SD)

Female (n = 4799)

Mean (SD)

Male (n = 3632) Mean (SD)

P-valuea

Refractive Prediction Error

 Holladay 1

− 0.017 (0.569)

0.053 (0.585)

− 0.110 (0.533)

< 0.0001*

 SRK/T

−0.011 (0.570)

0.072 (0.585)

−0.120 (0.529)

< 0.0001*

 Hoffer Q

−0.016 (0.596)

0.051 (0.623)

−0.104 (0.547)

< 0.0001*

 Haigis

−0.019 (0.557)

0.011 (0.585)

−0.059 (0.514)

< 0.0001*

 Barrett

−0.021 (0.516)

0.021 (0.533)

−0.076 (0.488)

< 0.0001*

Refractive Absolute Prediction Error

 Holladay 1

0.396 (0.409)

0.398 (0.432)

0.394 (0.375)

0.93

 SRK/T

0.403 (0.403)

0.405 (0.428)

0.400 (0.367)

0.77

 Hoffer Q

0.424 (0.420)

0.433 (0.451)

0.412 (0.375)

0.11

 Haigis

0.386 (0.402)

0.391 (0.436)

0.379 (0.353)

0.30

 Barrett

0.357 (0.374)

0.363 (0.391)

0.349 (0.349)

0.17

  1. * Indicates statistical significance at the 0.05 level
  2. a Association between gender and continuous variables was assessed using Student t-test