Table 2 Data of the neurotropic phenomenonof LCD from the remaining 12 patients, 9 with a 6-year of observation and 2 (3 eyes) with a 4-year observation
Eye No. | Years of observation | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st year | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | 5th year | 6th year | |||||||||||||
Classification of neurotropic phenomenon of LCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | |
1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
6 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
7 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
8 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
10 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
11 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Average | 5.58 | 3.08 | 0.58 | 5.58 | 3.50 | 1.08 | 5.00 | 3.83 | 1.33 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 2.33 | 4.00 | 5.44 | 3.56 | 3.33 | 4.78 | 4.44 |