Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Frequently assessed and used prognostic factors for outcome after macular hole surgery: which is better?

Original Submission
29 Jul 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mathias Roth
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mathias Roth
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mathias Roth
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Oct 2021 Editorially accepted
18 Nov 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12886-021-02164-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page