Skip to main content

Table 3 Ophthalmic history: NVG patients treated with a glaucoma GDD

From: The influence of etiology on surgical outcomes in neovascular glaucoma

 

ALL

n

PDR

n

RVO

n

Other

n

VA at presentation (Log Mar)

1.61 (SD: 0.73)

120

1.66 (SD: 0.73)

74

1.45 (SD: 0.75)

28

1.68 (SD: 0.71)

18

IOP at presentation (mmHg)

43.7 (SD: 13.5)

120

44.5 (SD:13.7)

74

42.4 (SD: 10.5)

28

42.5 (SD: 16.9)

18

Age at presentation (years)a

66.9 (SD: 11.7)

120

58.2 (SD: 8.8)

74

72.4 (SD: 11.7)

28

65.4 (SD: 12.4)

18

Non-neovascular Glaucoma before presentation

30 (25%)

119

13 (17.6%)

73

10 (35.7%)

28

7 (38.9%)

18

Lens Status at presentation

 Phakic

53 (48%)

110

36 (52.9%)

68

11 (45.8%)

24

6 (33.3%)

18

 Pseudophakic

55 (50%)

110

31 (45.6%)

68

13 (54.2%)

24

11 (61.1%)

18

 Aphakic

2 (1.8%)

110

1 (1.5%)

68

0 (0%)

24

1 (5.6%)

18

Intravitreal injection before presentation

48 (44.9%)

107

56 (75.7%)

64

21 (75%)

25

10 (55.6%)

18

Intravitreal injection at presentation

69 (53.5%)

120

44 (58.7%)

74

17 (54.8%)

28

8 (34.8%)

18

Panretinal photocoagulation before presentation

67 (55.8%)

120

48 (64.9%)

74

10 (35.7%)

28

9 (50%)

18

Panretinal photocoagulation at presentation

19 (14.7%)

120

14 (18.7%)

74

2 (7.1%)

28

3 (16.7%)

18

On no glaucoma meds at presentation

58 (48.33%)

120

41 (55.4%)

74

11 (39.3%)

28

6 (33.3%)

18

Afferent pupillary defect (APD) at presentation

9 (22%)

41

3 (15.8%)

19

4 (30.8%)

13

2 (22.2%)

9

Hyphema at presentation

20 (17%)

118

11 (14.9%)

74

5 (18.5%)

27

4 (23.5%)

17

Vitreous Heme at presentation

22 (22%)

99

16 (22.5%)

59

3 (11.1%)

25

3 (17.7%)

15

Retinal detachment at presentation

7 (7.1%)

99

7 (11.7%)

60

0 (0%)

22

2 (11.1%)

17

  1. aStatistically significant age difference for PDR relative to RVO (p = < 0.001) and Other (p = 0.012)
  2. Note: Continuous variables are presented with standard deviations (SD) and evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical variables are presented with percentages (%) and evaluated using chi-square, exact chi-square, and the Jonckheere-Terpstra test