Skip to main content

Table 2 Ophthalmological outcomes

From: Visual outcomes of observation, macular laser and anti-VEGF in diabetic macular edema in type 1 diabetes: a real-world study

 

All

N = 304

Observation

N = 45

Macular laser

N = 100

Anti-VEGF

N = 124

Macular laser and anti-VEGF

N = 35

Age at DME onset**, mean (SD)

47.4 (14.4)

47.5 (16.1)

43.0 (12.1)

49.9. (14.5)

44.7 (13.2)

Given anti-VEGF-injections, mean (SDa)

   

6.0 (4.2)

6.5 (6.5)

Visual impaired eyes, n (%)

 at DME onset

22 (7.2)

4 (8.9)

3 (3.0)

11 (8.9)

4 (11.4)

 after the first DME

16 (5.3)

3 (6.7)

4 (4.0)

7 (5.6)

2 (5.7)

 at the end of follow-up

7 (2.3)

2 (4.4)

3 (3.0)

2 (1.6)

0 (0)

Recurrence of DME, n (%)

193 (63.5)

41 (91.1)

59 (59)

80 (64.5)

13 (37.1)

BCVA , mean (SDa)

 at DME onset

76.4 (12.5)

81.6 (8.8)

80.8 (13.1)

72.8 (11.1)

72.4 (13.2)

 at the end of first episode

79.7 (11.5)

80.8 (12.6)

80.7 (13.7)

78.9 (9.9)

78.5 (8.9)

 at the end of follow-up

78.9 (12.2)

78.3 (17.7)

80.2 (13.4)

78.3 (10.1)

78.7 (9.0)

ETDRS letters gain after first episode, mean (95% CIb)

2.9 (2.1 to 3.8)

0.1 (-3.6 to 3.8)

-0.4 (-1.9 to 1.1)

4.9 (3.9 to 6.0)

5.5 (2.9 to 8.1)

p-value

<0.001*

>0.90

0.61

<0.001*

<0.001*

ETDRS letters gain at the end of follow-up, mean (95% CIb)

1.8 (1.0 to 2.7)

-3.7 (-7.4 to 0.04)

-1.1 (-2.7 to 0.4)

4.1 (3.1 to 5.2)

5.1 (2.5 to 7.8)

p-value

<0.001*

>0.90

0.14

<0.001*

<0.001*

  1. VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor, DME Diabetic macular edema, BCVA Best corrected visual acuity with ETDRS letters
  2. *Statistical significance (p-value < 0.05)
  3. **No statistical significance between groups (p = 0.38, ANOVA)
  4. aStandard deviation
  5. b95% confidence interval