Peer Review reports
From: A prediction model for sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in myopic eyes: a 1466-sample retrospective study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 29 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amr A Gab-alla |
| 24 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - You Yuan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 15 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - You Yuan |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 24 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amr A Gab-alla |
| 30 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Jul 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Jul 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12886-022-02535-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.