Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparisons of the energy efficiency and intraocular safety of two torsional phacoemulsification tips

Original Submission
2 Feb 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Yan-Xiu Sun
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Yan-Xiu Sun
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Yan-Xiu Sun
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Yan-Xiu Sun
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
14 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Yan-Xiu Sun
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilson Takashi Hida
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
27 Sep 2022 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12886-022-02619-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page