Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Independent-effect comparison of five crosslinking procedures for Progressive Keratoconus based on Keratometry and the ABCD Grading System using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)

Original Submission
27 Mar 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kepa Balparda
16 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alireza Peyman
7 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abdelrahman Salman
2 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 7
26 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
5 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abdelrahman Salman
9 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Capasso
22 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 8
22 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Qingyan Zeng
Resubmission - Version 9
23 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
6 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abdelrahman Salman
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
16 Dec 2022 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12886-022-02744-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page