Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Transscleral vs endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: safety and efficacy when combined with phacoemulsification

Original Submission
10 Jul 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
14 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 7
18 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - David Solá-Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 8
21 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
22 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
30 Mar 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12886-023-02877-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page