Skip to main content

Table 1 Summaries of clinical articles reporting the effect of blepharoplasty on corneal biophysics

From: Corneal biophysical changes after upper eyelid blepharoplasty and ptosis surgery: a review

Author (year)

Aim

Design

Intervention

Methods

Cases (eyes)

Mean age

Outcomes

Saadat and Dresner (2004) [12]

To assess the safety of blepharoplasty in patients with preop dry eyes

Retrospective

Upper blepharoplasty: skin and fat excision. No orbicularis was excised to preserve innervation

Lower blepharoplasty: transconjunctival approach for fat removal

Full history, ocular examination, basic Schirmer test with anesthesia

67

64

8% reported worsening in the severity of their dry eyes, 8% improvement, 83% no change

By preserving the orbicularis muscle and its innervation, the dynamics of eyelid closure, tear pumping, and tear distribution are not affected

Kim et al. (2007) [13]

To evaluate the effect of upper eyelid surgery on ocular surface sensation and tear production

Prospective

Blepharoplasty: excision of skin and orbicularis muscle flap

Ptosis: orbital septum opened and levator aponeurosis advanced or resected

Cochet–Bonnet esthesiometer, Schirmer 1 test without anesthesia

11 (21)

62

A significant temporary decrease in ocular surface sensation that returns to baseline after 1 month

Zinkernagel et al. (2007) [14]

To compare the effects of different upper eyelid procedures on corneal topography

Prospective

Skin-only blepharoplasty, blepharoplasty with reduction of the medial fat pad, blepharoplasty with reduction of the entire fat pad, and levator advancement

Computed corneal topography before surgery and at 3 months

43 (82)

59

Statistically significant correlation between the severity of upper eyelid abnormality and topographical corneal changes after surgery

Changes in astigmatism were greater when large fat pads were reduced

Postop astigmatic axis changes were not systematic

Rogers et al. (2012) [15]

To assess the effect of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on CS

Prospective

Routine upper eyelid blepharoplasty under local anesthetic

Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m, VA, and automated 60:4 visual field

14 (28)

63.5

Significant increase in log CS from 1.49 to 1.64

Kim et al. (2013) [2]

To assess CS and VA after upper eyelid blepharoplasty

Prospective

Excess skin, orbicularis, and fat pad excision

CS was measured by an automated Contrast Glaretester. HOA by KR-1W Wavefront Analyser. Lash ptosis was measured using a 4-point rating scale

16 (22)

47.4

CS significantly increased in every spatial frequency and light condition

HOA (total HOA, 3rd and 4th order, trefoil, coma, and second astigmatism decreased significantly. Lash ptosis also decreased after. Corneal topography showed no difference

Dogan et al. (2015) [16]

To evaluate corneal parameters obtained by Scheimpflug imaging after blepharoplasty

Prospective

Excess skin and fat pad excision

Preop and postop (3rd month) Sheimpflug imaging: CCT, ACD, steepest keratometry, astigmatic power vectors

30 (60)

56.5

The only parameter that was significantly different was the steepest keratometry in patients with preop MRD1 < 2.5 mm

Other parameters showed no differences

Simsek et al. (2015) [9]

To determine any change in corneal astigmatism and VA changes following upper blepharoplasty

Prospective

Routine upper eyelid blepharoplasty surgery

Pentacam and VA before, 1 and 3 months postop

23 (43)

46.3

Statistically significant astigmatic changes (0.15 D); but clinically insignificant VA changes. No significant change in astigmatism axis was detected

An et al. (2016) [17]

To assess the effects of upper lid blepharoplasty on visual quality

Prospective

Excess skin, orbicularis and fat pad excision

CS: Vector Vision CSV-1000 chart; levator function test; Lash ptosis: 4-point rating scale

39 (73)

62.6

A significant increase in CS under scotopic and photopic conditions were found

Lash ptosis also improved

Kim et al. (2016) [18]

To analyze corneal curvature changes after upper eyelid surgery, and to compare the effects of different upper eyelid procedures on corneal curvature

Prospective

Blepharoplasty: excision of redundant skin orbicularis muscle and fat

Ptosis: levator resection

Corneal topography before surgery, and at 6 weeks

34 (50)

57.9

Levator resection showed greater changes of corneal curvature (central corneal power and astigmatism) than blepharoplasty

The advanced aponeurosis technique may have a greater effect on the lid/cornea interface

Rymer et al. (2017) [11]

To evaluate the effects of Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) on ocular surface and dry eye symptoms

Prospective

Bilateral upper eyelid skin excision with MMCR or skin-only excision

Salisbury Eye Evaluation Questionnaire, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, fluorescein and rose Bengal staining

46 (92)

62

No changes were seen in patients who underwent blepharoplasty alone in the questionnaire scores. No changes were found in tear production profiles in the blepharoplasty-only group. Addition of MMCR to upper eyelid blepharoplasty did not worsen the dry eye profile

Mohammed (2018) [19]

Study the impact of orbicularis strip excision during upper blepharoplasty on postop dry eye symptoms

Interventional comparative

Upper blepharoplasty ± orbicularis excision

Corneal and tear film, TBUT and Schirmer's tests

20 (40)

57

Orbicularis excision during blepharoplasty causes temporary decrease in TBUT and more occurrences of reversible dry eye symptoms

Nalci et al. (2020) [20]

To evaluate the impact of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on CS in dermatochalasis patients

Prospective

Skin-only blepharoplasty

CS measured using sine-wave contrast sensitivity chart, corneal topography

34 (34)

63

CS significantly increased after upper eyelid blepharoplasty, especially at higher spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd), which are usually reduced in older adults

Keratometric and corneal HOAs did not change significantly

Bhattacharjee et al. (2020) [21]

To analyze the long-term changes in CS and HOAs, and corneal topography after upper eyelid blepharoplasty

Prospective

Excess skin and fat pad excision

CS: Pelli–Robson chart

HOAs: WaveLight Allergio analyzer

Corneal topography: topographic modeling system-4

30 (60)

56

At 12 months, the mean CS, the majority of HOAs, and corneal topography (only cylinder) showed a stable, statistically significant difference

Ekin and Ugurlu (2020) [22]

To evaluate the changes of VA, CS, astigmatism, and HOA after blepharoplasty

Prospective

Excess skin and fat pad excision

Corneal topography (Sirius)

103 (206)

56.7

No significant differences were observed for VA. The CS

significantly increased at all spatial frequencies both under glare and nonglare conditions. The mean refractive

astigmatism significantly decreased. In patients with

MRD < 2 mm, mean CS was increased and mean astigmatism decreased significantly compared with those with ⩾ 2 mm. HOA and root mean square decreased significantly

Sommer et al. (2022) [4]

To investigate the effect of skin-only upper eyelid blepharoplasty on corneal biomechanics and topographic parameters

Prospective

Excision of redundant skin orbicularis muscle and fat

The corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis were assessed by ocular response analyzer

Pentacam

35 (42)

64.5

The increasing CH and CRF might indicate a rise of corneal damping capacity. Despite statistically significant differences of Kmax, I-S and ISV, all other tomographical/ topographical parameters did not change. The corneal steepening and the decrease of I-S do not seem to have a clinically relevance

  1. BCVA best corrected visual acuity, HOA high order aberration, CS contrast sensitivity, MRD marginal reflex distance