Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride versus air tamponade for idiopathic macular hole: a retrospective study

Original Submission
10 Apr 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mingwei Zhao
Resubmission - Version 2
23 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mingwei Zhao
Resubmission - Version 3
24 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mingwei Zhao
Resubmission - Version 4
24 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mingwei Zhao
Resubmission - Version 5
25 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mingwei Zhao
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
17 Jun 2023 Editorially accepted
20 Jul 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12886-023-03049-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page