Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics and quality of studies included in this systematic review

From: Influencing factors comparing different vault groups after phakic implantable collamer lens implantation: review and meta-analysis

Article

Design

Country

Age

Duration

(Month)

Size/eyes

(L/N/H)

Method

Factor

NOS

(S + C + E = T)

Qi GW

2020 [23]

CSS

China

27.2 ± 6.4

3

22/86/10

Pentacam

[(1)(2)(4)(8)]

(7)(10)(11)(12)

4 + 1 + 2 = 7

Wang J

2021 [24]

CSS

China

24.40 ± 5.76

12

4/68/8

Pentacam

[(1)(2)(17)]

(16)

4 + 2 + 2 = 8

Xiong Y

2020 [27]

CSS

China

28.40 ± 7.40

0.25

10/246/20

AS-OCT

[(1)(2)(3)]

(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)

(9)(10)(11)(12)

3 + 1 + 3 = 7

Wu Y

2022 [25]

CSS

China

23.60 ± 4.35

3–6

0/39/19

Pentacam

[(1)(2)(5)(10)(9)(13)]

(4)(6)(7)(11)(12)(14)(15)

3 + 2 + 3 = 8

Li N

2019 [22]

CSS

China

25.17 ± 4.57

24

41/126/21

Pentacam

[(1)(2)(4)(8)]

(7)(10)(11)

4 + 1 + 3 = 8

Zhang X

2021 [28]

1:1

CCT

China

18~47

12–24

76/140/58

AS-OCT

[(1)(2)(3)(6)(8)(10)(16)](7)(11)

4 + 1 + 2 = 7

Xi H

2022 [26]

CSS

China

28.27 ± 7.39

1

12/62/24

AS-OCT

[(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)]

(10)

4 + 1 + 3 = 8

Cui TF

2019 [21]

1:1

CCT

China

26.2 ± 8.4

12

38/70/29

Pentacam

[(1)(3)(6)(16)]

(2)(7)

4 + 2 + 2 = 8

Kyum KW 2012 [20]

CSS

Korea

26.1 ± 4.0

2

8/93/29

AS-OCT

[(1)(3)]

(2)(10)(14)

4 + 2 + 2 = 8

Khan MA

2022 [19]

1:2

CCT

Japan

28.93 ± 5.26

12

27/54/0

AS-OCT

[(1)(17)(18)(12)]

(2)(7)(9)(10)(11)(14)(19)

4 + 2 + 3 = 9

Chen Q

2020 [18]

1:2

CCT

China

25.13 ± 5.29

1

0/54/27

Pentacam

[(4)(16)(19)]

(1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(8)(10)(14)(17)

4 + 1 + 3 = 8

Cerpa MS

2021 [9]

CSS

Spain

32.27 ± 7.56

4

34/272/54

AS-OCT

[(1)(6)(7)(10)(17)]

(2)(9)(11)(19)(20)

4 + 2 + 3 = 9

Alfonso JF

2012 [17]

CS

Spain

31.25 ± 6.91

3

65/227/31

AS-OCT

[(1)(2)]

4 + 1 + 3 = 8

  1. CSS, case series study; CCT, case-control study; CS, cohort study. L/N/H, low vault/ Normal vault/ High vault. S + C + E = T, population selectivity + comparability between groups + outcome/exposure factor measure = total score. Influencing factors: (1) ACD; (2) hWTW; (3) LT, lens thickness; (4) ACV, anterior chamber volume; (5) ACA, anterior chamber angle; (6) ICL-size; (7) ICL-SE; (8) AL, axial length; (9) CCT, central corneal thickness; (10) age; (11) Kf (12) Ks (13) LDist, Alpha angle; (14) pupil diameter; (15) Kappa angle; (16) posterior chamber structure, including posterior chamber angle, ciliary processes height (T value), or distance between STS plane and crystalline lens (STSL); (17) crystalline lens, including CLR and LC, its rise and curvature; (18) iris morphology, iris concavity; (19) gender; (20) ATA, angle to angle distance. Factors in ‘[]’ are significant ones in the corresponding literature