Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of the studies included in the systematic review (n = 13)

From: The effect of polyethylene cover intervention on ocular surface disorder of intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors (year)

Country

Aim

Design

Comparison (Control) group

Sample and study population

Data collection

Method of analysis

Kocaçal 2021 [16]

Turkey

To compare the effect of carbomer eye drops when used alone and in combination with polyethylene covers in the healing of exposure keratopathy

RCT

The control group received only carbomer, eye drops while the intervention group received both carbomer eye drops and polyethylene covers

24 patients

fluorescein stain test

Chi-square test, Friedman Test, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, and Mann-Whitney U Test

SO, 2008 [25]

China

Comparing the effectiveness of polyethylene covers (GladwrapTM) with lanolin (Duratears1) eye ointment in the prevention of corneal abrasions in critically ill patients

RCT

The control group received lanolin eye ointment while the intervention group received polyethylene covers

116 patients

fluorescein stain test

Fisher’s exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis

Güler 2010 [3]

Turkey

Comparing polyethylene covers and carbomer eye drops for critically ill patients

RCT

One eye of the patient was randomly covered with a polyethylene cover every 12 h, and carbomer drops were instilled in the other eye every six hours

18 patients

Schirmer and fluorescein tests

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test Mann–Whitney U test Chi-square test, Spearman Correlation

Sorce 2009 [27]

Chicago

To determine whether a moisture chamber over the eye is more effective in preventing corneal abrasions compared with standard therapy

RCT

The experimental group received the instillation of a ribbon of lubricating petrolatum white and ophthalmologic ointment and maintenance of a small piece of plastic film over the eye. The control received the standard of care in the units

207 Patients

fluorescein stain

Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon’s, and McNemar’s test

Ahmadinejad 2020 [30]

Iran

To compare three eye care methods to prevent OSD

In ICU patients

RCT

Three groups using the six-person blocks. In the first block, 2 patients received polyethylene cover and eyelid taping; in the second block, 2 patients received polyethylene cover and simple eye ointment; and in the third block, 2 patients received eyelid taping and simple eye ointment

152 Patient

slit lamp with fluorescein staining

ANOVA and chi-square tests

Logistic regression and zero-inflated Poisson regression

Koroloff 2004 [24]

Australia

compare the efficacy of two forms of eye care (hypromellose and Lacri-Lube combination vs. polyethylene/Cling wrap covers) for ICU

patients

RCT

group one (n = 60) received a treatment combining hypromellose drops and LacriLube (HL) Group two (n = 50) had polyethylene covers only placed over the eye

110 patients

fluorescein stains and mobile slit lamp

Chi-square. T- Test, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher’s exact tests

Khatiban 2021 [7]

Iran

To compare the use of polyethylene eye covers and artificial teardrops versus normal saline on the incidence and severity of OSD in comatose patients

RCT

group A, patients received artificial teardrops for left and normal saline for right eyes, in group B polyethylene covers for left and normal saline for right eyes, and in group C polyethylene covers for left and artificial teardrops for right eyes

90 patients

Fluorescein Staining Pattern

Chi-Square

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)

McNemar’s test the Kruskal–Wallis’s test

Kalhori 2016 [8]

Iran

compare the effect of three eye care techniques in the prevention of keratopathy

RCT

polyethylene cover, liposic ointment, and artificial tear drop randomly on one eye of each sample and a comparison was made with the opposite eye as the control

96 patients

Fluorescein Staining and portable slit lamp

chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance

Nikseresht 2019 [28]

Iran

To compare the effectiveness of polyethylene cover versus polyethylene cover with artificial tear drop to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients

RCT

one eye was randomly selected as a control eye and the other was considered as an intervention eye

104 patients

Schirmer and fluorescein tests

Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, independent t-test, Friedman test, Fischer’s exact test and Mann–Whitney U-test)

Shan 2010 [29]

China

To compare the efficacy for preventing exposure keratopathy of three forms of eye care (artificial tear, moist chamber, and polyethylene covers) for ICU patients

RCT

Three treatment groups, including artificial tears group, moist chambers group, and polyethylene film group

84 patients

fluorescein stains

One-way analysis of variance, Tukey’s tests, and Chi-square test

Babamohamadi 2018 [31]

Iran

determine the effectiveness of vitamin A eye ointment (VAEO) and moist chamber (MC) in preventing OSD in ICU patients

RCT

patients were randomly administered VAEO in one eye every and a polyethylene cover (PC) was placed on their other eye

38 patients

Fluorescein stain examination and Schirmer’s tests

Wilcoxon, McNemar, and Spearman tests

Al-Ribh 2012 [26]

Saudi Arabia

Comparing the effectiveness of polyethylene covers with Viscotears gel in the prevention of corneal abrasions in critically ill patients

RCT

All participants randomly receive polyethylene covers in one eye and viscotears gel in the other eye

40 patients

fluorescein stain test

Mann-Whitney test and Fisher’s exact tests, McNemar’s test

Nikseresht 2021 [14]

Iran

Comparing the Effect of Three Eye Care Methods on the Severity of Lagophthalmos in ICU Patients

RCT

The control eye received routine interventions in one eye. Experimental group “polyethylene cover,” polyethylene cover plus artificial tear drops,” and “polyethylene cover plus Lubratex eye ointment.” In another eye

156 patients

lagophthalmos intensity checklist, fluorescein stain strips

ANOVA, Friedman test, Wilcoxon test, Kruskal–Wallis test