Table 1 Comparison of the results obtained with Adaptica 2WIN and Nidek ARK-1

Dsph

− 0.80 ± 2.46

− 0.83 ± 2.97

0.03 ± 0.98

− 1.89 to 1.95

0.95 ( p < 0.0001)

0.58

Dcyl

− 0.75 ± 0.75

− 0.82 ± 0.81

0.07 ± 0.38

− 0.67 to 0.81

0.89 ( p < 0.0001)

0.56

Axis

78.40 ± 68.35

88.18 ± 67.79

− 9.78 ± 8.45

−26.09 to − 6.53

0.37 ( p < 0.0006)

0.34

J0

0.19 ± 0.43

0.22 ± 0.47

− 0.03 ± 0.18

− 0.38 to 0.32

0.92 ( p < 0.0001)

0.72

J45

0.01 ± 0.26

0.00 ± 0.27

0.01 ± 0.15

− 0.28 to 0.30

0.83 (p < 0.0001)

0.69

SE

− 1.18 ± 2.46

− 1.24 ± 2.94

0.06 ± 1.00

−1.90 to 2.02

0.95 (p < 0.0001)

0.89

PD

63.05 ± 3.54

63.33 ± 3.62

− 0.28 ± 1.69

− 3.59 to 3.03

0.89 (p < 0.0001)

0.64

Cyclo Dsph

− 0.87 ± 2.17

−0.34 ± 3.09

−0.53 ± 1.15

− 2.78 to 1.72

0.94 (p < 0.0001)

0.33

Cyclo Dcyl

−0.56 ± 0.63

−0.83 ± 0.78

0.27 ± 0.49

−0.69 to 1.23

0.73 (p < 0.0001)

<0.01

Cyclo Axis

75.89 ± 69.50

83.86 ± 0.78

− 8.98 ± 7.95

−24.32 to 6.36

0.43 (p < 0.0001)

0.46

Cyclo J0

0.13 ± 0.33

0.19 ± 0.47

−0.06 ± 0.35

−0.75 to 0.63

0.67 (p < 0.0001)

0.40

Cyclo J45

0.01 ± 0.20

−0.02 ± 0.26

0.03 ± 0.16

−0.28 to 0.34

0.78 (p < 0.0001)

0.48

Cyclo SE

−1.13 ± 2.19

−0.76 ± 3.03

−0.37 ± 1.21

−2.74 to 2.00

0.94 (p < 0.0001)

0.57

Cyclo PD

63.03 ± 3.57

63.30 ± 3.60

− 0.27 ± 1.68

− 3.56 to 3.02

0.90 (p < 0.0001)

0.58