Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparatively analysing the postoperative optical performance of different intraocular lenses: a prospective observational study

Original Submission
24 Jan 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 8
31 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
9 Feb 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Feb 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 9
25 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 9
7 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Hao Cheng
Resubmission - Version 10
2 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
9 Apr 2024 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12886-024-03439-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page