Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristic of included studies

From: Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Number

Study

N

Gender(female%)

Age (Mean + SD)

Treatment

Intraocular lens model

Optical Feature

Groups

Follow-up period

Outcomes included in metaanalyses

1

Alió, J. L. (2018) [27]

17

NR

63.2 ± 7.7

bifocal IOL

IOL AT LISA 809 M

diffractive IOL

B

1 m, 6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, UIVA, CIVA, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo

17

NR

bifocal IOL

IOL ReSTOR SN6AD1 (Alcon)

diffractive IOL

B

15

NR

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISAtri 839MP

diffractive IOL

C

2

Cardona, G. (2018) [28]

18

44.40%

72.5 ± 3.5

monofocal IOL

Tecnis ZA9003

aspheric IOL

A

3 m

CIVA

12

16.67%

77 ± 4.2

bifocal IOL

Tecnis ZKB00

diffractive IOL

B

18

38.89%

71.5 ± 3.4

bifocal IOL

Tecnis ZLB00

diffractive IOL

B

16

37.50%

72 ± 5.3

bifocal IOL

AcrySof ReSTOR SV25T0

diffractive IOL

B

9

100%

69 ± 3.6

bifocal IOL

AT LISA 809 M

diffractive IOL

B

6

66.67%

78 ± 4.6

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISAtri 839MP

diffractive IOL

C

3

Hogarty, D. T. (2018) [29]

45

51.11%

78.44 ± 8.50

monofocal IOL

aspheric ZA9002 Tecnis® 3-piece IOL or the Tecnis® ZCT IOL

aspheric IOL

A

5 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, UIVA, CIVA, SE, Spectacle Independence

43

55.81%

73.00 ± 6.29

EDOF IOL

Tecnis® Symfony IOL

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

4

Poyales, F. (2019) [30]

33

66.67%

63.0 ± 7.9

trifocal-FineVision POD F

FineVision POD F

diffractive IOL

D

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition

30

66.67%

62.0 ± 12.8

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

FineVision POD FT

diffractive IOL

F

5

Lapid-Gortzak, R. (2020) [31]

86

60.67%

66.1 ± 9.3

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

diffractive IOL

E

6 m

UDVA, UNVA, UIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo

81

61.29%

65.6 ± 9.6

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISAtri 839MP

diffractive IOL

C

6

Law, E. M. (2020) [32]

47

NR

NR

monofocal IOL

Bi-Flex 677AB

aspheric IOL

A

3–6 m, 13–18 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo

43

NR

NR

bifocal IOL

Bi-Flex 677MY

diffractive IOL

B

7

Poyales, F. (2020) [33]

24

84.00%

65.0 ± 6.3

trifocal-FineVision POD F

FineVision POD F

diffractive IOL

D

3 m

UDVA, UNVA, CNVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition,

25

88.46%

66.0 ± 6.9

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

FineVision POD F GF

diffractive IOL

F

8

Ribeiro, F. (2020) [34]

15

NR

68 ± 8

trifocal-FineVision POD F

FineVision POD F

diffractive IOL

D

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, UIVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition

15

NR

66 ± 6

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

RayOne Trifocal

diffractive IOL

F

15

NR

64 ± 6

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

diffractive IOL

E

9

Ribeiro, F. J. (2020) [35]

30

53.33%

70 ± 8

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

diffractive IOL

E

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, CNVA, UIVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition

30

60.00%

68 ± 9

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

FineVision POD FT

diffractive IOL

F

10

Webers, V. S. C. (2020) [36]

13

60.00%

70.38 ± 6.0

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISA tri 839MP

diffractive IOL

C

3 m

UDVA, UNVA, UIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare

14

73.33%

67.57 ± 12.21

EDOF IOL

Symfony extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

11

Auffarth, G. U. (2021) [37]

74

59.46%

72.0 ± 6.8

monofocal IOL

TECNIS Monofocal, Model ZCB00

aspheric monofocal IOL

A

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare

68

58.82%

69.3 ± 8.7

enhanced monofocal IOL

The TECNIS Eyhance IOL (Model ICB00)

refractive IOL

H

12

Messias, A. (2021) [38]

17

NR

NR

monofocal IOL

monofocal SN60WF

aspheric IOL

A

12 m

SE

16

NR

NR

bifocal IOL

multifocal SN6AD1

diffractive IOL

B

13

Nováček, L. V. (2021) [39]

12

33.33%

56.0 ± 6.8

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

Liberty®677MY

diffractive IOL

F

3 m,12 m

SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare

16

33.33%

51.0 ± 7.28

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISA®tri 839 m

diffractive IOL

C

14

Reinhard, T. (2021) [40]

76

51.30%

68.9 ± 7.63

EDOF IOL

AT LARA 829MP (EDOF)

diffractive IOL

G

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

66

62.30%

69.4 ± 7.22

EDOF IOL

TECNIS Symfony (EDOF)

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

65

63.20%

71.0 ± 6.52

monofocal IOL

CT ASPHINA 409MP

aspheric IOL

A

15

Tran, D. B. (2021) [41]

25

48.00%

67 ± 8

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

diffractive IOL

E

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

23

73.91%

71 ± 9

EDOF IOL

extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

16

Turhan, S. A. (2021) [42]

15

46.67%

63.9 ± 8.4

bifocal IOL

Tecnis + 2.75 D (ZKB00) IOL

diffractive IOL

B

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA

14

42.86%

63.4 ± 7.1

EDOF IOL

EDOF Tecnis Symfony (ZXR00) IOL

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

17

Vargas, V. (2021) [43]

16

NR

60.5 ± 7.0

bifocal IOL

bifocal AcrySof IQ ReSTORþ3.0D

diffractive IOL

B

6 m

UDVA, UIVA, UNVA, Spectacle Independence

11

NR

58.8 ± 5.3

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

AT LISA tri 839MP IOL

diffractive IOL

C

18

Bala, C. (2022) [44]

149

60.26%

70.5 ± 4.3

EDOF IOL

DFT015 (EDOF) IOL

nondiffractive IOL

G

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

117

54.17%

70.0 ± 3.9

monofocal IOL

monofocal IOL SN60WF

aspheric IOL

A

19

Chang, D. H. (2022) [45]

147

61.49%

68.0 ± 7.5

EDOF IOL

TECNIS Symfony (EDOF)

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

148

56.95%

67.9 ± 7.9

monofocal IOL

TECNIS Monofocal

aspheric IOL

A

20

Ferreira, T. B. (2022) [46]

30

NR

62.6 ± 6.7

trifocal-other new trifocal IOLs

Tecnis Synergy(Vision)

wavefront-designed anterior aspheric surface

F

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

30

NR

61.1 ± 6.0

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

Acrysof PanOptix TFNT00

diffractive IOLs

E

30

NR

60.1 ± 6.8

trifocal-FineVision POD F

POD F (Finevision)

diffractive IOLs

D

21

Garzón, N. (2022) [47]

30

77.60%

75.87 ± 5.97

enhanced monofocal IOL

Eyhance model ICB00

refractive IOL

H

1 m

UDVA, CDVA, SE, CS under photopic condition

30

62.90%

70.62 ± 8.11

monofocal IOL

monofocal ZCB00 IOL

aspheric IOL

A

22

Gil, MÁ (2022) [48]

19

57.89%

74.3 ± 7.5

bifocal IOL

SVT250 Bifocal

diffractive and refractive IOL

B

6 m

CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition, halo, Spectacle Independence

20

75.00%

68.9 ± 12.9

bifocal IOL

ZKB00 Bifocal

diffractive IOL

B

19

78.95%

68.7 ± 10.3

trifocal-AT LISAtri 839MP

ATLISA Tri 839MP Trifocal

diffractive IOL

C

20

65.00%

73.3 ± 4.6

bifocal IOL

ZLB00 Bifocal

diffractive IOL

B

18

77.78%

71.6 ± 7.1

bifocal IOL

ATLISA 809 M Bifocal

diffractive IOL

B

20

75.00%

68.2 ± 6.2

EDOF IOL

Symfony ZXR00 Extended Depth of Focus

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

36

58.33%

72.1 ± 5.8

monofocal IOL

ZA9003 Monofocal

aspheric IOL

A

23

Guarro, M. (2022) [49]

22

50.00%

71.00 ± 9.27

EDOF IOL

AcrySof IQ Vivity(Vivity)

nondiffractive IOL

G

3 m

SE, halo, glare,

22

54.55%

73.52 ± 6.64

EDOF IOL

AT LARA 829MO(AT LARA)

diffractive IOL

G

22

54.55%

72.09 ± 4.45

EDOF IOL

TECNIS Symfony ZXR00(Symfony)

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

22

54.55%

76.19 ± 7.17

monofocal IOL

monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF

aspheric IOL

A

24

McCabe, C. (2022) [50]

106

55.14%

68.8 ± 7.82

EDOF IOL

DFT015 (EDOF) IOL

nondiffractive IOL

G

6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

111

56.63%

68.8 ± 6.63

monofocal IOL

monofocal IOL SN60WF

aspheric IOL

A

25

Nanavaty, M. A. (2022) [51]

25

NR

72.79 ± 8.04

enhanced monofocal IOL

TECNIS Eyhance IOL (ICB00)

refractive IOL

H

1 m,3–6 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, SE

25

NR

77.16 ± 9.79

monofocal IOL

monofocal RayOne

aspheric IOL

A

26

Pantanelli, S. M. (2022) [52]

24

83.30%

68.45 ± 6.53

EDOF IOL

Alcon AcrySof Vivity(EDOF)

nondiffractive IOL

G

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, CNVA, SE, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

27

70.40%

68.34 ± 6.48

monofocal IOL

(Bausch & Lomb enVista) intraocular lenses

aspheric IOL

A

27

Sevik, M. O. (2022) [53]

15

46.67%

63.43 ± 7.11

bifocal IOL

bifocal Tecnis + 2.75 D (ZKB00)

diffractive IOL

B

1 m,3 m,6 m

UDVA, UIVA, UNVA, SE, CS under mesopic condition, halo, glare, Spectacle Independence

14

42.86%

63.96 ± 8.42

EDOF IOL

Tecnis Symfony (ZXR00) EDOF

refractive and diffractive IOL

G

28

Asena, L. (2023) [54]

26

NR

68.92 ± 9.87

EDOF IOL

AcrySof®IQ Vivity EDOF

nondiffractive IOL

G

3 m

UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA, UNVA, SE, CS under photopic condition, CS under mesopic condition,

26

NR

63.06 ± 9.72

trifocal-AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00

AcrySof®IQ PanOptix

diffractive IOL

E