Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characteristics of ocular injuries associated with mortality in patients admitted with major trauma

BMC Ophthalmology volume 24, Article number: 125 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few ocular trauma studies have addressed mortality outcomes. We sought to determine characteristics of mortality-related ocular trauma admissions and compared them with non-fatal injuries.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using de-identified data of patients admitted with major trauma from the National Trauma Data Bank (2008–2014). Patients with ocular injury were identified using ICD- 9CM codes. Demographics, intention and mechanism, types of ocular and head injuries, and injury severity were documented. Mortality was determined using post-admission disposition. Statistical analysis using student t-test, chi-square, and odds ratios (OR) calculations were performed with STATA-17 software. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Of 316,485 patients admitted with ocular trauma, 12,233 (3.86%) were mortality related. Expired patients were older than survivors: mean (SD) of 50.1(25.5) vs. 41.5(22.8) years. White (OR = 1.32; P < 0.001), ≥ 65years old (OR = 2.25; P < 0.001), and male (OR = 1.05; P = 0.029) patients were most likely to expire than their counterparts. Common mechanisms of injury in survivors were falls (25.3%), motor vehicle traffic-occupant, MVTO (21.8%) and struck by/against (18.1%) and for fatal injuries, falls (29.7%), MVTO (21.9%) and firearms (11.5%). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was documented in 88.2% of mortality-related admissions. Very severe injury severity scores (ISS > 24) (OR = 19.19; P < 0.001) and severe Glasgow Coma Score (GCS < 8) (OR = 19.22; P < 0.001) were most associated with mortality than survival. Firearms were most associated with very severe ISS (OR = 3.73; P < 0.001), severe GCS (OR = 4.68; P < 0.001) and mortality (OR = 5.21; P < 0.001) than other mechanisms. Patients with cut/pierce injuries had the greatest odds of survival (OR = 13.48; P < 0.001). Optic nerve/visual pathways injuries (3.1%) had the highest association with very severe ISS (OR = 2.51; P < 0.001), severe GCS (OR = 3.64; P < 0.001) and mortality (OR = 2.58; P < 0.001) than other ocular injuries. Black patients with very severe ISS (OR = 32.14; P < 0.001) and severe GCS (OR = 31.89; P < 0.001) were more likely to expire than other race/ethnicities with similar injury severity.

Conclusions

Mortality-related admissions were older, male, and mostly of White race than ocular trauma admissions of survivors. Firearms were the deadliest mechanism. TBI was commonly associated and patients with optic nerve/pathway injuries, very severe ISS and severe GCS had higher mortality rates. Characteristics and demographic variations identified in this study may be useful in developing focused measures aimed at preventing trauma-related deaths.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Ocular injury is the leading cause of preventable, monocular blindness and visual impairment in the United States [1]. The incidence of ocular injury is estimated at 28 per 100,000 person-years and as such is a significant public health concern [2]. Ocular injury accounts for a total of 2.4 million Emergency Department (ED) visits annually and comprises 38–52% of all eye-related ED visits [3, 4]. Given the prevalence of ocular injury and its association with poor visual outcomes, several studies have sought to characterize contributing epidemiological risk factors [5,6,7]. Risk factors associated with poorer visual outcomes following ocular injury include age greater than 60 years, injuries occurring outside of the workplace, gun-shot wounds, and trauma sustained during a fall [8].

Adverse visual outcomes have been linked to a significant decrease in quality of life and mental health [9]. Higher rates of anxiety and depression have been reported following injuries [10]. Several studies have associated visual impairment from multiple causes with increased mortality [11,12,13]. Although studies have reported the associations between ocular injury and non-fatal outcomes such as loss of vision, morbidity, decreased quality of life, and decline in mental health none, to our knowledge, have associated acute ocular injury and mortality.

Trauma is a leading cause of preventable mortality and traumatic brain injury is the single leading source of premature demise from trauma in the United States [14, 15]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that over 300 thousand deaths (92 per 100,000) result from injuries, with most resulting from falls, motor vehicle accidents and firearms trauma [16]. In a previous epidemiologic study, we observed an incidence of deaths of 12,233 (3.9%) among patients admitted for major trauma with ocular injury in the United States [17]. Although the common mechanisms of injury were different from those outlined by the CDC, we found that a substantial number of patients (184,124, 58,2%) were documented to have TBI. This prompted our interest in identifying risk factors in acute trauma with ocular injuries that were associated with mortality.

To this end, we sought to identify and compare risk factors for non-fatal and fatal injuries in patients admitted with major trauma and ocular injuries, using the same NTDB database. Findings from this study may help identify at risk patients for appropriate triaging and management planning. With confirmation, our results may also provide a foundation for the development of public health strategies that help reduce trauma-associated mortality.

Methods and participants

This retrospective study used data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) collected between the years 2008–2014 and was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki. The NTDB is the largest national registry containing de-identified data of hospitalized trauma cases and was established by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) [18]. Data from the NTDB can be acquired upon request from the ACS.

In this study, we evaluated patients who were admitted with ocular trauma. Eligible patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes as well as external causes of injury (E-codes). The ICD-9-CM codes can be found in a previous study by He et al. [17] that utilized the same codes from the same data source. The following variables were documented for each patient that met inclusion criteria: age, sex, race, ethnicity, health insurance coverage, systolic blood pressure at admission, presence of diabetes and/or hypertension, types of ocular injury, intent of injury, location where injury took place, related intracranial injuries, length of hospital admission, and level of hospital trauma service (Levels I-IV: both ACS-verified and state-designated centers). Types of ocular injury were grouped into categories based on the type and location of the injury as previously described. [17] Patients were also evaluated for presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI was identified based on Center for Disease Control criteria of ICD-9 CM codes for head injuries including extradural hemorrhage, cerebral contusion, base of skull fracture, intracerebral hemorrhage, vault skull fracture, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, and fracture of the facial bone [18]. Details of the ICD-9 CM codes used are outlined in a previous study [19].

Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) and injury severity score values were also documented for each patient. GCS is a numerical index of degrees of traumatic brain injury and is documented in all trauma patients by Emergency Medical Services and upon admission to the emergency departments [18]. It ranges from 3 to 15 with lower numbers reflecting more traumatic brain injury. The injury severity score (ISS) assigns a numerical score as a measure of the degree of global injury severity. It ranges from 1 to 75 which represents a range from minor injuries (designated by lower scores) to more severe injuries resulting in an increased risk of mortality (designated by higher scores). Location and region, based on US census regions (Northeast, West, Midwest, and South) were documented as well. Post-admission dispositions for each patient were recorded, including home discharge, transfer to a nursing home, transfer to rehabilitation facility, transfer to another hospital, transfer to hospice services, left against medical advice and death on discharge. The dispositions were used to determine patient mortality.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis and presentation of findings followed the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) specifications for reporting epidemiologic studies. The mean (SD) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) were calculated for all continuous variables. Values for these variables were grouped into categories for analysis. The population was stratified by age groups of less than or equal to 20years (pediatric age), 21 through 64years (working age), and greater than or equal to 65years (older age). Injury severity scores (ISS) were categorized according to NTDB subclassifications of minor (ISS = 1–8), moderate (ISS = 9–15), severe (ISS = 16–24), and very severe (ISS > 24). Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) were categorized into mild (GCS = 13–15), moderate (GCS = 9–12), and severe (GCS ≤ 8). Comparative analysis of relative associations with variables was conducted for the major race/ethnicities of White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Characteristics of survivors were compared with patients who expired.

Categorized data was analyzed to detect associations between variables, using paired, two-tailed t-test and χ2 (chi-squared) tests. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify relative associations, which were expressed in odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and two-tailed P-values. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Descriptive and analytical calculations were performed using STATA, version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Graphs and tables were constructed using Microsoft Excel and Word (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Cases with data points documented as “unknown “or “undetermined” were excluded from analysis.

Results

General characteristics in mortality-related injuries

Between 2008 and 2014, 12,233 (3.86%) of 316,485 patients admitted with ocular injuries had documented mortality-related trauma. Of these patients, 8598 (70.3%) were male. The mean (SD) age was 50.1 (25.5) years. Patients between 21 and 64 year were the largest age strata with 6091 (49.8%) cases (Fig. 1). However, patients ≥ 65years old admitted with trauma were most likely to succumb to their injuries than other age groups (see below for analysis). The common races affected were White (71.8%), Black (10.8%), and Asian (2.2%). 17.4% were documented as “other” race. 1254 (10.3%) identified as Hispanic. Frequent mechanisms were falls (29.7%), motor vehicle trauma-occupant (MVTO) (21.9%) and firearms (11.5%) (Fig. 2). Common ocular injuries amongst those who expired were contusions of the eye/adnexa (49.1%) and orbital fractures (30.1%). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was documented in 10,787 patients (88.2%) and frequent associated head injuries were facial fractures (61.3%) and subdural hemorrhages (35.4%). Mean (SD) injury severity score was 29.8 (13.4) and Glasgow coma score was 6.5(4.8). Most injuries were unintentional (75.9%) and occurred in street (44.6%) and home (34.1%) locations, and in the Southern US census region (37.7%). Table 1 provides a summary of the descriptive epidemiologic characteristics for fatal and non-fatal major trauma with ocular injuries.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage of ocular trauma in survivors and expired in different age groups - National Trauma Data Bank (2008–2014). Legend: Patients between 21 to 64year were the largest age strata with 6091 (49.8%) cases

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Mechanisms of Injury in Non-Fatal and Mortality-Related Ocular Trauma. Legend: Frequent mechanisms for expired patients were falls (29.7%), motor vehicle trauma-occupant (MVTO) (21.9%) and firearms (11.5%)

Full size image
Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of patients with mortality-related ocular trauma (survivors vs. expired), National Trauma Data Bank (2008–2014)
Full size table

Comparative analysis

Demographic differences

Logistic regression analysis revealed statistically significant demographic differences between those who survived and those who expired. Expired patients were older than survivors: mean (SD) of 50.1 (25.5) vs. 41.5 (22.8) years. Patients most likely to expire were those ≥ 65 years old (OR = 2.25, CI 2.16–2.34; P < 0.001) whereas those most likely to survive were between 21 and 64 years old (OR = 1.53, CI 1.48–1.59; P < 0.001). Males (OR = 1.05, CI 1.00-1.09; P = 0.029) were most likely to succumb to their injuries than female patients. These males were also younger than females with mean (SD) age of 48.6(23.9) vs. 53.7(28.8) years; (P < 0.001). With respect to race/ethnicity, White patients were more likely to die than Black and Hispanic patients (OR = 1.32, CI 1.27–1.38; P < 0.001). However, Black (OR = 1.30, CI 1.15–1.47; P < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR = 1.24, CI 1.09–1.40; P < 0.001) were similarly more likely to die within a day of admission, while White patients were more likely to survive until 4-6days of admission (OR = 1.30, CI 1.16–1.46; P < 0.001). Further demographic differences in mechanism, intention and severity of injury are detailed below.

Ocular injuries and head trauma

88.2% of expired patients suffered TBI compared to 57.0% of survivors. Patients with optic nerve/visual pathways injuries comprised only 3.1% of ocular injuries and had the highest odds of having documented concomitant TBI (OR = 15.51, CI 5.25–75.68; P < 0.001). These patients had the highest odds of associated base of skull fractures (OR = 1.67, CI 1.32–2.11; P < 0.001), and very severe ISS > 24 (OR = 2.51, CI 1.83–3.49; P < 0.001), and severe GCS < 8 (OR = 3.64, CI 2.51–5.44; P < 0.001). Consequently, patients with optic nerve/visual pathways injuries had the highest odds of mortality (OR = 2.58, CI = 2.32, 2.88; P < 0.001) than other ocular injuries. Indeed, they were most likely to expire within 3 days of admission than other ocular injuries (OR = 1.65, CI 1.30–1.08; P < 0.001). Of patients admitted with TBI, those with traumatic optic neuropathy were most associated with mortality (OR = 2.27; CI, 2.02–2.55; P < 0.001) than other visual pathway injuries. In comparison, patients who suffered open wound of the ocular adnexa had the highest odds of survival (OR = 2.21, CI 2.09–2.34; P < 0.001).

Regarding associated head injuries, patients with intracerebral hemorrhages had the highest odds of mortality (OR = 6.59, CI 6.31–6.88; P < 0.001), followed by those with base of the skull fractures (OR = 5.78, CI 5.53–6.04; P < 0.001), subdural hemorrhage (OR = 5.34, CI 5.14–5.56; P < 0.001), subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR = 4.87, CI 4.68–5.06; P < 0.001). Patients with associated base of skull (OR = 1.68, CI 1.54–1.83; P < 0.001) and skull vault fractures (OR = 1.66, CI 1.52–1.80; P < 0.001) had similarly greater odds of expiring within a day of admission than patients with other head trauma. Patients with facial fractures were most likely to survive their injuries (OR = 0.85, CI 0.82–0.89, P < 0.001) and those that died were more likely to survive greater than 6 days after admission, than patients with other head injuries (OR = 1.25, CI 1.15–1.35; P < 0.001) (Supplemental Table 1).

Intent and mechanism of injury

Most mortality-related injuries were due to blunt trauma in both survivors (82.8%) and patients who expired (76.7%). In both groups, unintentional injury was the most common intent of injury (Table 1). Assault victims were most likely to survive (OR = 1.87, CI 1.77–1.98; P < 0.001) than those of other intentions. Patients admitted with self-inflicted injury were most likely to expire (OR = 7.66, CI 7.10–8.28; P < 0.001) than those who suffered injuries from other intentions. There were also distinct differences between age groups and sex. Patients ≥ 65 years old were most likely to suffer unintentional injury (OR = 5.90, CI 5.13–6.76; P < 0.001) whereas patients < 20 years old were most likely to be injured through assault (OR = 6.54, CI 5.78–7.40; P < 0.001). Patients between 21-64years old had the greatest odds of expiring from self-inflicted injuries (OR = 2.51, CI 2.16–2.91; P < 0.001). Males were most likely to expire following self-inflicted injury (OR = 2.69, CI 2.21–3.26; P < 0.001) while females died after unintentional injuries (OR = 1.71, CI = 1.54–1.90; P < 0.001) than other intentions. Regrading race, Black (OR = 5.41, CI 4.74–6.19; P < 0.001) and Hispanic (OR = 2.29, CI 1.97–2.66; P < 0.001) patients were most likely to be injured and expire following assault injuries. White patients were most likely to be of unintentional (OR = 2.30, CI 2.09–2.53; P < 0.001) and self-inflicted injuries (OR = 1.88, CI 1.57–2.26; P < 0.001) than other race/ethnicities. Asian patients did not exhibit a strength of association with any intention (Supplemental Table 2).

Differences were observed in mechanisms of injury. Common mechanisms in survivors were falls (25.3%), motor vehicle traffic occupant accidents (MVTO) (21.8%) and struck by/against (SBA (18.1%). For fatalities, falls were also the most common (29.7%) mechanism, followed by MVTO (21.9%) and firearms (11.5%) (Fig. 2). Firearm injuries had the greatest odds of fatality (OR = 5.21, CI 4.90–5.53; P < 0.001) than other mechanisms while victims of cut/pierce injuries had the greatest odds of survival (OR = 13.48, CI 7.46–24.37; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Additionally, patients admitted with firearms-related injuries were more likely to expire within a day of admission (OR = 3.19, CI 2.85–3.59; P < 0.001) while victims of struck by/against (OR = 1.52, CI 1.21–1.89; P < 0.001) and falls (OR = 1.46, CI 1.46, CI 1.34–1.59; P < 0.001) survived greater than six days before their demise. When classified by race/ethnicity, White patients were most likely to experience mortality-related injury due to falls (OR = 2.32, CI 2.10–2.56; P < 0.001), whereas Black patients had the highest odds of firearm injury (OR = 2.73, CI 2.36–3.16; P < 0.001). Both Asian (OR = 2.08, CI 1.43–2.95; P < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR = 1.70, CI 1.40–2.05; P < 0.001) were most likely to be victims of MVT-pedestrian trauma.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Logistic Regression Analysis of Association Between Mortality and Mechanism of Injury in Ocular Trauma. Legend: Cut/Pierce mechanism was most associated with survival while firearms were most associated with mortality

Full size image

Regarding sex, admitted males were most likely to expire following MVT-motorcycle (OR = 4.05, CI = 3.25–5.10; P < 0.001). Females were mostly victims of falls (OR = 2.28, CI 2.00-2.37; P < 0.001). Comparison by age also yielded differences in mortality-associated mechanisms of injury. Firearm injuries had the greatest odds of mortality compared to other mechanisms across all age groups, with the highest odds in those ≥ 65 years old (OR = 6.82, CI 5.67–8.19; P < 0.001) and lowest odds in those ≤ 20 years (OR = 5.14, CI 4.45–5.95; p < 0.001) (Fig. 4). Patients ≤ 20 years old had greatest odds of cut/pierce injury (OR = 3.28, CI 3.07–3.51; P < 0.001) and were most likely to survive these injuries (OR = 48.12, CI 6.78-342.43; P < 0.001). Although falls were the most common mechanism of both fatal and non-fatal trauma, those ≤ 20 years old had greater odds of survival after falling (OR = 3.43, CI 2.59–4.54; P < 0.001) and those 21–64 years old had the lowest odds of survival after falling (OR = 1.21, CI 1.12–1.31; P < 0.001), followed by patients ≥ 65 years old (OR = 1.70, CI 1.59–1.82; P < 0.001).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Logistic Regression Analysis of Association Between Age and Mechanism of Injury in Mortality Related Ocular Trauma. Legend: Firearms were most associated with mortality in all age groups

Full size image

Severity of injury

Very severe injury severity scores (ISS > 24) (OR = 19.20, CI 18.42–20.01; P < 0.001) and severe GCS (< 8) (OR = 19.22, CI 18.43–20.04; P < 001) were more associated with mortality. Patients with very severe ISS were more likely to die if ≤ 20 years old (OR = 42.15, CI 36.75–48.25, P < 0.001), male (OR = 20.73, CI 19.70-21.81, P < 0.001), and of Black race (OR = 32.14, CI 28.17–36.67, P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with severe GCS were also most likely to perish if they were ≤ 20 years (OR = 135.26, CI 106.94-171.07; P < 0.001), male (OR = 20.33, CI 19.31–21.42, p < 0.001), or of Black race (OR = 31.89, CI 27.74–36.67, P < 0.001) (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4). Firearms were most associated with very severe (OR = 3.73, CI 3.56–3.91, P < 0.001) and severe traumatic brain injury (OR = 4.68, CI 4,47-4.89, P < 0.001).

Comparing insurance coverage, patients that were covered by Medicare were most likely to expire (OR = 1.82, CI 1.75–1.90, P < 0.001) and had higher odds of mortality compared to patients with commercial insurance (OR = 0.78, CI 0.75–0.81 P < 0.001). Indeed, patients covered by commercial insurance (OR = 1.28, CI 1.23–1.34, P < 0.001) had the highest odds of survival.

Discussion

Summary of findings

Most mortality-related studies in ophthalmology have evaluated different levels of diabetic retinopathy with all-cause deaths [20,21,22] and few publications have reported associations between visual disability and premature mortality [11,12,13]. Although mortality has been reported in several ocular trauma papers, to our knowledge, known have sought to identify variables most related to early demise following trauma. Our study found that amongst patients admitted with major trauma with ocular injuries, those most likely to be victims of trauma-related mortality were older than 65years, male and White patients. The majority had associated traumatic brain injury. Ocular and head injuries most associated with mortality were optic nerve/visual pathway injuries and base of skull fractures. Common mechanisms were falls, MVTO injuries in non-fatal and fatal injuries. However, the fatal injury category had substantially more firearms injuries than the survivors. Firearms were most associated with very severe injury severity score, and severe traumatic brain injury, and thus mortality, while cut/piece injuries had the lowest association with fatality. Although falls were the most common mechanism of both fatal and non-fatal trauma, those ≤ 20yrs had greater odds of survival after falling. Both very severe ISS and severe GCS were more associated with mortality than survival. However, Black patients with high levels of injury severity were more likely to die than other races/ethnicities in the same strata.

Ocular injuries and mortality

We established those patients with higher degrees of injury severity (GCS < 8, ISS > 24) were most associated with mortality than patients with less severe injury scores. Consequently, visual pathway injuries were associated with more severe presentations and had increased odds of mortality than other ocular injuries. In contrast, patients who had open wounds of ocular adnexa were associated with less severe pathologies (GCS 13–15) and higher rates of survival. Clearly injuries to the optic nerve and visual pathways can be categorized as TBI, the number one cause of death from trauma [14, 15]. Traumatic brain injury has received most attention in relation to sport and combat related injury. However, it is now increasingly recognized in other forms of trauma. Numerous studies have examined visual and ocular sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI) [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. However, few have evaluated the concurrence of ocular trauma and TBI and post-admission mortality. We found the rate of TBI in all 316,845 patients admitted with major trauma and ocular injuries was less (58.2%) than for those who succumbed to their injuries (88.2%). Gise et al. [30] evaluated visual pathway injuries in pediatric patients and found that this group had a higher mortality (17.6%) compared to all pediatric patients admitted with major trauma and ocular injuries (2.9%). Our findings comport with this mortality data and underscore the impact of TBI and visual pathway injuries post-admission hospital mortality.

Using the same NTDB database, during this time, it was noted that traumatic optic neuropathy was the most common visual pathway injury [17, 30]. The optic nerves are vulnerable to direct injuries through avulsion, transection, contusion, optic nerve sheath and orbital hemorrhages. Indirect impact of rapid acceleration/deceleration injuries resulting in transmitted traction and shearing forces are more common than direct injury. These injuries occur most commonly in the intracanalicular section at the skull base [31]. This supports our findings that base of skull fractures have higher mortality rates than most other head injuries (Supplemental Table 1). Other investigators have similarly observed an association between base of skull [32, 33] and optic nerve injuries with injury severity and in hospital mortality following trauma [30, 33]. Some investigators have extended cranial nerve evaluations to include the TBI with oculomotor, trochlear and abducens nerves. We observed only 145 cases for all these injuries and elected not to separate them for separate analysis. However, Jin et al. [34] showed an association between cranial nerve injury associated with TBI and high morbidity and mortality rates. Indeed, isolated third cranial nerve palsy has been associated with a poor post-traumatic prognosis [35]. Future studies with larger databases may corroborate these findings, however, it is unlikely that they will surpass the impact of traumatic optic neuropathy on morbidity and mortality.

Mechanisms and intentions

Our study confirmed previously reported findings that firearms and self-inflicted injuries were associated with more severe injury indices and thus mortality [19, 36, 37]. Cut/piece injuries have lower severity indices and lower mortality. In a study of all patients admitted with major trauma and ocular injuries, He et al. [17] found that victims of firearms injuries were 3.73 times greater odds of very severe ISS and 4.77 times greater odds of severe TBI than other mechanisms of injury. Compared to a 3.9% mortality for all admitted patients with ocular trauma, victims of firearms injuries had a mortality rate of 16.2% [17, 36]. In this study all 1409 patients admitted with firearms -related were documented to have TBI. Most firearms-related ocular injury reports have been studies of non-powder guns [38, 39]. There’s a dearth of reports that include powder firearms -related ocular trauma that report mortality. However, a study conducted at one urban center found the mortality was 18%. Our findings that used the same data source as Truong et al., comport with these findings of high mortality [40]. General trauma literature has similarly found higher severity indices and mortality for firearms injury [41, 42] and a propensity for self-inflicted firearms injuries to involve the head and face [41, 43]. A recent study used CDC data and heat maps from 1990 to 2021 to evaluate trends in demographic and regional disparities in firearms-related mortality [44]. They found demographic disparities that mirror our findings with similarly disproportionate representation of male and Black patients. Assault (homicide) was most common amongst Black and Hispanic patients and suicide amongst white patients. Additionally, the noted a disturbing trend of increasing firearm-related suicides amongst White non-Hispanic females and firearm-related assault deaths amongst Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic females [44].

Firearm-related deaths are a major growing public health issue in the United States with a total annual cost of $557 billion (2.6% of GDP) [45]. A recent Pew Research Center report [46] collated data from sources including the CDC and FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) to evaluate trends in gun violence in the US. They found that the annual rate of firearms-related deaths in 2021 was 48,830, an increase of 23% since the 2019 (pre-COVID pandemic) rate. Incidents of mass-shootings increased by 51% in the same period. This report also noted that most injuries, 54%, were due to suicide, followed by 43% due to assault or homicide. The remainder comprised unintentional, law enforcement and undetermined intentions [46]. More than half of suicides, 55%, involved a firearm. Firearm-related injuries now exceed motor vehicle accidents as the leading cause of premature death from trauma in individuals less than 24years of age [16, 47, 48]. This is thought to have resulted from simultaneous rise in gun violence and decrease in motor vehicle accidents. Although attention is directed at mortality rates from these injuries, the vast majority survive to live with various degrees of disability. Physicians need to be vigilant and triage and manage patients appropriately to improve survival rates in patients admitted with major trauma associated with firearms.

Similarly lacking are reports focused on intentions and ocular injuries. Gise et al. [30] in an assessment of intentions in pediatric ocular injuries found that victims of self-inflicted injuries were most likely to have TBI, very severe ISS and severe GCS. These children had 8.5 times higher odds of mortality than other intentions. This study found that firearms were the most likely mechanism [19]. Other trauma investigators have reported similarly high injury severity and mortality rates with self-inflicted trauma than other intentions [41,42,43].

Demographic differences

Demographic differences were observed regarding mechanisms and intention of mortality-related injuries. In general, we affirmed previous study observations with higher rates amongst male, white, and Southern populations. Black patients were most likely to be victims of assault-related ocular trauma whereas White patients were most likely to have fall-related injuries. Hispanic and Asians were most likely victims of MVT-pedestrian injuries. Although more White patients expired overall, Black patients were almost twice as likely to expire following severe injury (GCS < 8, ISS > 24). Other minorities (Asians, Hispanics) were also more likely to expire, but not as noteworthy when compared to White patients. Interestingly, Black and Hispanic were victims to different mechanisms of injury, however, were similarly most likely to die within the first day of admission.

Black patients have the highest odds of firearm-related injury than other races/ethnicities and such injuries are associated with high rates of mortality [49, 50]. However, it does not explain the two-fold difference in likelihood of death between White and Black patients at the same level of injury severity score and TBI at presentation and higher likelihood of death within one day of admission. Improved understanding of factors that contribute to fatality associated with major trauma with ocular injuries can promote physician surveillance of patients that present with high-risk features. Furthermore, results can guide development of public health interventions that mitigate primary risk in the general population.

Several studies have elucidated the role of race in disease management. Two studies that utilized the NTDB, from an earlier time, found that minority patients with severe TBI were less likely to be placed in rehabilitation compared to their White counterparts after acute hospitalization [51, 52]. Owens et al. [53] found that in ED settings, racial and ethnic minorities had lower prioritization due to lower triage scores, experienced longer wait times, and were more likely to leave the ED without being seen by a provider. These studies show that prior to and following hospitalization, there are race-based biases in treatment practices. The same could hold true during in-patient management and is one such explanation for the findings in this study. Regardless, it is important to raise awareness of this issue amongst clinicians to ensure more equitable evaluation and management [54]. A recently published report of firearms-related ocular trauma found that race/ethnicity disparities in care extended to discharge priorities. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to be allocated to advanced care facility than their White counterparts. This was noted for all insurance coverage and injury severity levels [55]. Further research that illuminates specific factors associated with increased mortality of minority patients admitted with very severe injury is warranted. A deeper inspection of implicit bias in global healthcare delivery and education of caregivers will help to prevent unnecessary trauma-related deaths.

Insurance coverage

Interestingly, we also found that insurance coverage was associated with mortality. Those with commercial insurance were more likely to survive their injuries than those with government insurance (Medicare/Medicaid) and self-paying patients. Previous studies have delineated risk factors leading to ocular trauma, including age < 30 years, male gender, and lower socioeconomic status [56,57,58]. In our cohort of 316,485 patients who suffered ocular trauma, 3.86% succumbed to their injuries. Patients most likely to expire were ≥ 65 years old, male, white, and of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Although we defined those with Medicare insurance as being of lower SES, our estimations may be confounded by the fact that those entitled to this insurance usually are ≥ 65year old. Insurance is often an indicator of SES, and others have found that public insurance (Medicare and Medicaid) holders are generally of a lower SES than commercial insurance holders [59].

Low et al. [60] showed that lower socioeconomic status (SES) is correlated to higher incidence of severe ocular trauma. Patients who are uninsured or have public health insurance have been shown to have poorer health outcomes compared to patients with private health insurance [61]. Our study affirms these findings regarding trauma-related mortality. In this population, patients with Medicare had the greatest odds of mortality while patients with commercial insurance had the greatest odds of survival. This may be attributed to several factors: patients with lower SES are more likely to suffer from chronic conditions, [62,63,64] have limited healthcare literacy, [65] and decreased access to healthcare resources [66]. Poor initial health status place individuals at a lower baseline health prior to the trauma itself and has more devastating impact on outcomes [67,68,69].

Limitations

This study is limited by the breadth and depth of data accessed from the NTDB. Data was accessed from 2008 to 2014 and accuracy of the results is dependent upon proper documentation and ICD-9 CM coding by submitting teams. For analytic expedience, we categorized injury severity based on ISS, GCS, and presence of TBI; we did not detail the specifics of extracranial and non-ocular injuries. While injury may have had concomitant cranial and ocular injuries, the primary injury that ultimately led to demise was not captured in this data analysis. In addition, when calculation of odds ratios, can only determine the strength of association of variables but cannot draw conclusions about causal relations. Lastly, NTDB does not detail ophthalmic examinations. Thus, our study did not address visual outcomes prior to mortality, which is another factor in characterizing the extent of ocular injury. Documentation is based on ED/Trauma team assessment and may not reflect subsequent Ophthalmic assessments. An example of the ocular injury category of “retinal edema,” it is not clear whether this means OCT-determined retinal edema or commotio retinae. Furthermore, a full detailing of all ophthalmic injuries that would require slit lamp examination, and ocular motor (III, IV, VI) and ancillary visual field and optic coherence tomography assessment may not be possible in the context of major trauma. Thus, the estimation of various ophthalmic lesions within this database may represent underestimations. Despite these limitations, this study has merits of using a large trauma database to determine factors associated with mortality in patients admitted with major trauma and ocular injuries. Although providing a foundation, future studies are required to confirm our findings. Use of up-to-date data from 2014 to present day with use of current ICD10 codes, with more consideration of whole-body injuries and associated visual outcomes prior to mortality would add to our knowledge base.

Conclusions

In this study of the NTDB (2008–2014), non-fatal and mortality-related ocular trauma had differences in mechanism of injury, age, gender, race, and injury severity. Male, White, ≥ 65 years old and, Medicare-covered patients were most likely be victims of mortality-related trauma. Injuries resulting in very severe injury severity scores and severe traumatic brain injury (GCS) had the highest association with mortality. Firearms were the deadliest mechanism and the most likely to cause death in the elderly and within a day of admission. Cut/pierce injury was the most benign mechanism and most likely to be survived by the young. Black patients admitted with high injury severity scores were more likely to die than other race/ethnic groups in the same severity categories. To our knowledge, our investigation is the first to characterize risk factors of major trauma and ocular injury associated with mortality. Observed factors may be useful in identifying at risk individuals and help in developing focused public health measures aimed at preventing trauma-related deaths.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the NTDB® website: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/quality/national-trauma-data-bank/.

References

  1. Swain T, McGwin G. The prevalence of Eye Injury in the United States, estimates from a Meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020;27:186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramirez DA, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Keenan JD. Ocular Injury in United States Emergency departments: Seasonality and Annual trends estimated from a nationally Representative Dataset. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;191:149–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aghadoost D. Ocular trauma: an overview. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3(2):e21639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Haring RS, Canner JK, Haider AH, Schneider EB. Ocular injury in the United States: emergency department visits from 2006–2011. Injury. 2016;47:104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park J, Yang SC, Choi HY. Epidemiology and clinical patterns of Ocular Trauma at a level 1 Trauma Center in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36:e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guly CM, Guly HR, Bouamra O, Gray RH, Lecky FE. Ocular injuries in patients with major trauma. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2006;23:915–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5:143–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the United States Eye Injury Registry. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karaman S, Ozkan B, Gok M, et al. Effect of eye trauma on mental health and quality of life in children and adolescents. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmmed AA, Ting DSJ, Figueiredo FC. Epidemiology, economic and humanistic burdens of ocular Surface Chemical Injury: a narrative review. Ocul Surf. 2021;20:199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karpa MJ. Direct and Indirect effects of Visual Impairment on Mortality Risk in older persons: the Blue mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee DJ. Visual acuity impairment and mortality in US adults. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DJ, Gómez-Marín O, Lam BL, Zheng DD. Glaucoma and survival. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1476–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Facts. https://www.aast.org/resources/trauma-facts. Accessed July 24, 2023.

  15. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion, Getting the Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/get_the_facts.html. Accessed July 24, 2023.

  16. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All Injuries. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm. Accessed July 24, 2023.

  17. He CH, Poulsen DM, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. Characteristics of ocular trauma in the United States. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2022;85:240–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fantus RJ, Nance ML. Annual Report 2015: Regional trauma. The Bulletin. Published January 1, 2016. https://bulletin.facs.org/2016/01/annual-report-2015-regional-trauma/. Accessed July 18, 2022.

  19. Gise R, Truong T, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. A comparison of pediatric ocular injuries based on intention in patients admitted with trauma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabanayagam C, Chee ML, Banu R, et al. Association of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic kidney Disease with all-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in a multiethnic Asian Population. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e191540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu XH, Sun B, Zhong S, Wei DD, Hong Z, Dong AQ. Diabetic retinopathy predicts cardiovascular mortality in diabetes: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Orsi E, Solini A, Bonora E, et al. Retinopathy as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2023;49:101413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnett BP, Singman EL. Vision concerns after mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015;17:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Merezhinskaya N, Mallia RK, Park D, Bryden DW, Mathur K, Barker FM. Visual deficits and dysfunctions associated with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96:542–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sen N. An insight into the vision impairment following traumatic brain injury. Neurochem Int. 2017;111:103–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ventura RE, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL. The neuro-ophthalmology of head trauma. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1006–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobs SM, Van Stavern GP. Neuro-Ophthalmic deficits after head trauma. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13:389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wright WG, Tierney RT, McDevitt J. Visual-vestibular processing deficits in mild traumatic brain injury. J Vestib Res. 2017;27:27–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cockerham GC, Goodrich GL, Weichel LED, et al. Eye and visual function in traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46:811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gise R, Truong T, Poulsen DM, Soliman Y, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. Pediatric traumatic brain injury and ocular injury. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;22:421–e4253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Warner N, Eggenberger E. Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review of the current literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:459–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alhelali I, Stewart TC, Foster J, et al. Basal skull fractures are associated with mortality in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:1155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Garcia TA, McGetrick BA, Janik JS. Spectrum of ocular injuries in children with major trauma. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2005;59:169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jin H, Wang S, Hou L, et al. Clinical treatment of traumatic brain injury complicated by cranial nerve injury. Injury. 2010;41:918–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Uberti M, Hasan S, Holmes D, Ganau M, Uff C. Clinical significance of isolated third cranial nerve palsy in traumatic brain injury: a detailed description of four different mechanisms of injury through the analysis of our case series and review of the literature. Emerg Med Int. 2021;2021:5550371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Truong T, He CH, Poulsen DM, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. Firearm-associated ocular injuries: analysis of national trauma data. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021;84:58–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weiss R, He C, Gise R, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. Patterns of pediatric firearm-related ocular trauma in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137:1363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Khalaily S, Tsumi E, Lifshitz T, Kratz A, Levy J. Airsoft gun-related ocular injuries: long-term follow-up. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;22:107–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee R, Fredrick D. Pediatric eye injuries due to nonpowder guns in the United States, 2002–2012. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015;19:163–e1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chopra N, Gervasio KA, Kalosza B, Wu AY. Gun trauma and ophthalmic outcomes. Eye. 2018;32:687–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Foote CW, Doan XL, Vanier C, Cruz B, Sarani B, Palacio CH. Suicide versus homicide firearm injury patterns on trauma systems in a study of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Sci Rep. 2022;12:15672.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cai Z, Junus A, Chang Q, Yip PSF. The lethality of suicide methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;300:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Quenzer F, Givner A, Dirks R, Coyne C, Ercoli F, Townsend R. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds: a retrospective, observational study of U.S. trauma centers. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22:518–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rees CA, Monuteaux MC, Steidley I, et al. Trends and disparities in firearm fatalities in the United States, 1990–2021. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2244221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Song Z. The business case for reducing firearm injuries. JAMA. 2022;328:1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gramlich J. What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/. Accessed July 24, 2023.

  47. Klein J, Prabhakaran K, Latifi R, Rhee P. Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022;7(1):e000766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee LK, Douglas K, Hemenway D. Crossing lines — a change in the leading cause of death among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1485–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Spitzer SA, Pear VA, McCort CD, Wintemute GJ. Incidence, distribution, and lethality of firearm injuries in California from 2005 to 2015. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2014736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Schell TL, Cefalu M, Griffin BA, Smart R, Morral AR. Changes in firearm mortality following the implementation of state laws regulating firearm access and use. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:14906–10.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Shafi S, de la Plata CM, Diaz-Arrastia R, et al. Ethnic disparities exist in trauma care. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;63:1138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bowman SM, Martin DP, Sharar SR, Zimmerman FJ. Racial disparities in outcomes of persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Med Care. 2007;45:686–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Owens A, Holroyd BR, McLane P. Patient race, ethnicity, and care in the emergency department: a scoping review. CJEM. 2020;22:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saadi A, Bannon S, Watson E, Vranceanu AM. Racial and ethnic disparities associated with traumatic brain injury across the continuum of care: a narrative review and directions for future research. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9:786–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mike EV, Brandsdorfer A, Parsikia A, Mbekeani JN. Disparities associated with discharge patterns in firearm-associated ocular trauma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141:564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mahan M, Purt B. Ocular trauma prevention strategies and patient counseling. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580537/. Accessed September 21, 2022.

  57. Klopfer J, Tielsch JM, Vitale S, See LC, Canner JK. Ocular trauma in the United States. Eye injuries resulting in hospitalization, 1984 through 1987. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1992;110:838–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kousiouris P, Klavdianou O, Douglas KAA, et al. Role of Socioeconomic Status (SES) in Globe injuries: a review. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2022;16:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Panth N, Barnes J, Sethi RKV, Varvares MA, Osazuwa-Peters N. Socioeconomic and demographic variation in insurance coverage among patients with head and neck cancer after the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg. 2019;145:1144–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Low L, Hodson J, Morris D, Desai P, MacEwen C. Socioeconomic deprivation and serious ocular trauma in Scotland: a national prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sarkar M, Earley ER, Asti L, Chisolm DJ. Differences in health care needs, health care utilization, and health care outcomes among children with special health care needs in Ohio: a comparative analysis between Medicaid and private insurance. J Public Health Manag Pract JPHMP. 2017;23:e1-e9. 3.

  62. Oates GR, Jackson BE, Partridge EE, Singh KP, Fouad MN, Bae S. Sociodemographic patterns of chronic disease. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52:S31–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR, Pamuk E. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:S186–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Höfelmann DA, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Peres KG, Boing AF, Peres MA. Chronic diseases and socioeconomic inequalities in quality of life among Brazilian adults: findings from a population-based study in Southern Brazil. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28:603–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Coughlin SS, Vernon M, Hatzigeorgiou C, George V. Health literacy, Social determinants of health, and disease prevention and control. J Environ Health Sci. 2020;6:3061.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Fourquet J, Zavala DE, Missmer S, Bracero N, Romaguera J, Flores I. Disparities in healthcare services in women with endometriosis with public vs private health insurance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:623.e1-623.e11.

  67. Herrera-Escobar JP, Seshadri AJ, Rivero R, et al. Lower education and income predict worse long-term outcomes after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87:104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Popal Z, Berkeveld E, Ponsen KJ, et al. The effect of socioeconomic status on severe traumatic injury: a statistical analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. McHale P, Hungerford D, Taylor-Robinson D, Lawrence T, Astles T, Morton B. Socioeconomic status and 30-day mortality after minor and major trauma: a retrospective analysis of the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) dataset for England. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0210226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank John McNelis MD, FACS, FCCM, MHCM, Chairman, Department of Surgery and James Meltzer MD, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York, for their contributions and support and for providing us with access to the NTDB database. We obtained written permission to acknowledge their contributions.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

    Sruthi Kodali

  2. Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn, USA

    Catherine H He

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA

    Sheel Patel

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York Medical College, Queens, NY, USA

    Alice Tao

  5. Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA

    Moshe Szlechter & Joyce N Mbekeani

  6. Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center/ Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

    Moshe Szlechter & Joyce N Mbekeani

  7. Department of Research Services, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Afshin Parsikia

Authors
  1. Sruthi Kodali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine H He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheel Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alice Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moshe Szlechter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Afshin Parsikia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Joyce N Mbekeani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Each author made substantial contributions to the conception: design of the work (CHH, SP, MS, AP and JNM); the acquisition, analysis of data (CHH, SP, AP, AT and JNM); interpretation of data (SK, CHH, SP, AT, MS, AP and JNM); the creation of new software used in the work (AP); have drafted the work or substantively revised it (SK, CHH, SP, AT, MS, AP and JNM); approved the submitted version and any substantially modified version that involves the author’s contribution to the study) (All Authors); and to have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature (All Authors).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce N Mbekeani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to conduct and publish this study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board (IRB) of Albert Einstein College of Medicine and deemed unnecessary according to their regulations for using de-identified data. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

No ffinancial interest or conflict of interest exists for any author.

Meeting presentations

1. Characteristics of Ocular Injuries Associated with Mortality in Patients Admitted with Major Trauma, AAO, San Francisco, Ca, October 2019.

2. Comparative Analysis of Mechanisms Associated with Non-Fatal and Mortality Related Ocular Trauma, WOC, Cape Town (Virtual), June 2020.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kodali, S., He, C.H., Patel, S. et al. Characteristics of ocular injuries associated with mortality in patients admitted with major trauma. BMC Ophthalmol 24, 125 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03392-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03392-y

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us