Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

On the ocular findings in ochronosis: a systematic review of literature

BMC Ophthalmology201414:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-12

Received: 24 April 2013

Accepted: 27 January 2014

Published: 30 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Ochronosis/Alkaptonuria is a tyrosine metabolism disorder where accumulation of homogentisic acid, in eye, skin, cartilage and several other connective tissues leads to a black pigmentation of the affected tissues. It is autosomal-recessive inherited in men with a frequency of 1-9/1,000,000. While it is clear that pigment deposits lead to joint destruction, renal stone formation and cardiac valvulopathy respectively, the significance of ocular findings is still unclear. We therefore aim to evaluate the frequency and clinical significance of ocular findings in ochronosis and discuss possible therapeutic options.

Methods

Systematic review of literature via Medline and Web of Science. Only case reports in English, German, French, Spanish or Italian documenting detailed ophthalmologic examination were included.

Results

Our search revealed 36 case reports including 40 patients. Average age at the onset of ocular signs was 40.6 years. The most frequent sign was symmetric brown sclera pigmentation present in 82.5 percent of the patients. “Oil-drops”, brown pigment spots in the limbus are generally considered pathognomonic but were a little less frequent (75 percent). Vermiform pigment deposits at the level of the conjunctiva or increased conjunctival vessel diameter is also frequent. We found an increased incidence of central vein occlusion and elevated intraocular pressure going along with chamber angle hyperpigmentation. Another condition observed twice is rapid progressive astigmatism attributable to corneoscleral pigment accumulation.

Conclusion

Our observations suggest that ocular findings are of double relevance. First, characteristic ocular findings can anticipate the time of diagnosis and second, ocular findings may complicate to various conditions putting sight at risk. Opthalmologists and general physicians should be aware of both. Therapeutic options include protein restriction, administration of high dose vitamin C or nitisonone. Evidence for all of them is limited.

Keywords

Hereditary ochronosis Endogenous ochronosis Alkaptonuria Oil-drops Eye Opththalmology Homogentisic acid Ocular Homogentisic acid oxidase deficiency

Background

Alkaptonuria (AKU/hereditary ochronosis/homogentisic acid oxidase deficiency/ORPHA56) is a rare autosomal recessive condition where tyrosine metabolism is disturbed [1, 2]. Its frequency is estimated with 1-9/1,000,000 in overall population but it may reach much higher values in certain ethnic groups [35]. In AKU, homogentisic acid 1,2 dioxygenase (HGO, EC 1.13.11.5) is mutated [1]. Until today, 115 mutations are identified [6]. HGO converts homogentisic acid (2,5-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, HGA) – the third intermediate of tyrosine catabolism – to maleylacetoacetic acid (Figure 1, black arrows) [7, 8]. In AKU, enzyme deficiency leads to a complete block within the tyrosine metabolism cascade [1]. As a consequence, HGA levels in plasma increase by a manifold [3]. A portion of the HGA is excreted in urine. When exposed to air, HGA oxidizes giving the urine a deep brown color [9, 10]. Another portion of HGA accumulates in connective tissue over the years where it associates with collagen fibers, followed by non-catalytic polymerization and oxidation to benzoquinoneacetic acid (BQA, Figure 1, ochre arrows). Binding thus becomes irreversible resulting in melanin-like pigment deposits, macroscopic brown turning and dysfunction of the tissue [1012].
Figure 1

Tyrosine metabolism pathway in health (black) and AKU (ochre) [10],[11]. Metabolites are drawn in Boxes, enzymes are given in bold. Red: Defect in AKU. Blue: Sites of possible therapeutic interventions.

While the genetic defect, resulting in brown discoloration of urine is referred to as alkaptonuria, the term hereditary ochronosis is applied for the tissue manifestation of the disease, classically including cartilage, skin and sclera [10, 13]. Cartilage involvement is probably the most striking feature, accurately described by Rudolf Virchow who also developed the term “ochronosis” [14].

Clinically and radiologically ochronotic cartilage destruction closely imitates anklyosating spondylitis additionally affecting the big peripheral joints and making joint replacement necessary at young age [3, 10]. Pigment accumulation further leads to ocular affection, skin darkening, cardiac valve impairment and several other less frequent affections [3, 10, 15]. Many clinical aspects of ochronosis have been assessed in detail [3] and a recent review aims to estimates their frequencies [15]. However, attempts to assess the nature of the ocular signs in ochronosis date back at least to the 1950s and are rather unsystematic [1618]. Consequently also good estimates regarding the frequency of ocular findings are rare. Several authors claim that they are present in more than 2/3 of the cases reported in literature, suggesting that they could be of significant diagnostic value [1620]. Recent case reports additionally propose that they might also be associated with pathologic conditions like glaucoma, progressive astigmatism and anterior uveitis [2124].

The core of this work is formed by a systematic review of literature concerning the nature, frequency and clinical consequences of ochronotic changes in the eye. We will further discuss diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic aspects from an ophthalmologic point of view.

Methods

A Medline and Web of Science search was conducted using the term “(Eye AND alkaptonuria) OR (eye AND ochronosis) OR (ocular AND alkaptonuria) OR (ocular AND ochronosis) OR (ophthalmology AND alkaptonuria) OR (ophthalmology AND ochronosis)” on 12/Feb/2013. In our analysis only full-text available case reports or case series published in English, German, Spanish, French or Italian were included. Double reported cases were excluded.

To accurately estimate the frequency of the single ocular signs, articles not documenting a proper ophthalmologic examination were excluded from our analysis. Within the articles identified as relevant we checked for references that did not appear in our search results and included those in our analysis.

Results

Our literature search revealed 74 articles. Within them we found 36 relevant case reports including 40 patients published between 1942 and 2012. Excluded articles and respective reasons are given in Table 1. The mean age of our patients was 61.0 (Standard deviation: ±9.5) years, with the youngest patient being 14 and the oldest 83 years old. The age at which the ocular findings first appeared was only given in eight articles [2532] and was 40.6 (Standard deviation: ±9.8, range 25 to 54) years.
Table 1

Overview: articles found in medline/web of science search that were excluded from our analysis

References

Reason for exclusion

n

[33, 34]

Full text not accessible

2

[3539]

Not case report or case series

5

[4047]

Not published in English, German, French, Spanish or Italian

8

[48]

Case double published

1

[4951]

Not relevant

3

[12, 5269]

No documentation of proper ophthalmologic examination

20

Sum

 

39

Clinical findings

The most common finding was hyperpigmentation of the sclera which was present in 33 patients [17, 18, 2132, 7086]. This scleral pigmentation was mostly observed symmetrically to both sides of the cornea within the palpebral fissure having blurred margins (Figure 2, left, with permission [31]). In most reports it remains unspecified at which level of the sclera the pigmentations were seen. D’Alessandro et al. see them in the deeper layers of the sclera [70]. Conjunctival changes were also frequent (22 cases) but more heterogeneous in appearance [18, 2123, 2527, 7582, 8690]. There are four main types of appearance which may also occur in combination: 1) Small “vermiform” [88] or “tube-like” [76] pigment deposits (Figure 2, middle, with permission [88]) [18, 27, 76, 81, 86, 88], 2) brown pingecula-like [81, 87, 89], 3) dot like [72, 77] or 4) laminar structures [22]. Dilatated conjunctival vessels can be present and seemingly supply the pigmented areas [25, 70, 76, 85, 87, 88]. Findings on the ocular surface are usually symptomless. “Sicca”-symptoms or foreign body sensation have only been reported twice in literature [31, 89].
Figure 2

Biomicroscopic findings in ochronotic eyes. Left: Symmetric brown scleral pigmentation at 3 and 9 o’clock (w. permission [31]). Middle: “Vermiform” pigment accumulation in the conjunctiva (Courtesy of Dr. U. Hackethal [88]). Right: “Oil drops” of the corneal limbus (w. permission [31]). All images show the right eye.

Pigment may also accumulate in the opaque portion of the limbus where it forms “oil drop”-like brown spots (Figure 2, right, with permission [31]), seen in 30 cases [17, 18, 2123, 2529, 31, 7081, 86, 88],[90, 91]. In analog to the pigmentations of sclera and conjunctiva, also the limbal pigment drops follow a horizontal orientation. They are located at the level of the Bowman’s Membrane or slightly inferior to it [17, 27, 76, 77]. In one case they were explicitly noted as the first feature of ochronosis in a 25 years old patient [27].

Severe progressive astigmatism has been reported twice [21, 22]. It was attributed by the authors to ochronotic accretions that were integrated from the sclera into the limbus and may have lead to corneoscleral thinning. Both patients were in their 70ies when astigmatism began to develop and in both cases the axis of the cylinder was around 0° thus oriented in a right angle to the pigment. Astigmatism progressed by 6 dpt within two years in one case and by 7 dpt within 11 years in the other [21, 22]. Ehongo et al. attempted a corneal transplant and bilateral thread placement. Both attempts did not bring enduring success, however re-progression was much slower after thread placement [21].

Hyperpigmentation of the chamber angles has been reported four times [23, 31, 70, 76]. Several other findings have only been observed sporadically. They include brown pigmentation of the optic disc [91], the retina [28] and the vitreous [91]. In addition, pigment inclusions may occur at the iris [28, 32, 76] or fit to the posterior surface of the lens [31, 90]. Table 2 summarizes the most common ophthalmologic findings.
Table 2

Frequency of the common signs present in the 37 patients summarized in this article

 

n

Percentage

References

Scleral pigmentation

33

82.5%

[17, 18, 2132, 7086]

Oil drops

30

75.0%

[17, 18, 2123, 2529, 31, 7081, 86, 88],[90, 91]

Conjunctival pigmentation

22

60.0%

[18, 2123, 2527, 7582, 8690]

Conjunctival vessels with increased diameter

6

15.0%

[25, 70, 76, 85, 87, 88]

Pigmented chamber angle

4

10.0%

[23, 31, 70, 76]

Pigment in the chamber angles might lead to increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and thereby to glaucomatous lesions. In total, 15 articles commented on the IOP, eight reporting values above 21 mmHg [21, 23, 70, 73, 74, 76, 85, 86]. Interestingly, in three of them the patients suffered from acute secondary glaucoma, always attributed to central vein occlusion [70, 73, 74]. Among the remaining cases, a primary glaucoma was only described in one case [23] while an increased intraocular pressure was documented, but not further discussed in two [76, 85]. Noteworthy, gonioscopy is only described in two of the cases indicating elevated IOP. It revealed a hyperpigmented chamber angle each time [23, 76].

There are two reports of acute recurrent anterior uveitis and ochronosis [18, 24]. In the first one uveitis is claimed to be the initial manifestation of ochronosis [24]. In the second one the patient has had uveitis in history and the authors see no association with ochronosis [18]. Both patients suffered from unilateral uveitis. While it was described as side-alternating and non-granulomatous in first case [24], in the other case recurrent episodes of specific uveitis on always the same – now blind – eye were reported [18].

Histopathology

We found six detailed histopathologic descriptions of the whole bulbus [28, 29, 7375, 81] and four descriptions of ocular biopsies [27, 82, 88, 89]. Ochronotic pigment is usually referred to as melanin-like which is true for the non-tinged tissue where it has a brown to olive, non-birefringent appearance. Histochemically, it rather behaves like elastin as being positively stained by van Gieson or Movat-pentachrome but not by Fontana [29, 73, 75, 81, 89]. In hematoxilin-eosin it is seen as light wine-red to eosinophilic but still with a pale olive appearance [81, 88] (Figure 3, with permission [88]).
Figure 3

Histopahtologic slice through a specimen obtained from the conjunctiva (Hematoxilin-Eosin staining). P: Ochronotic pigment, E: Conjunctival epithelium, SP: Substantia propria, G: conjunctival vessel. Courtesy of Dr. U. Hackethal [88].

In accordance to the clinical findings, also histologically the central cornea is usually clear. Though phagocytised pigment may well occur inside central endothelial cells [29]. The limbal “oil-drops” are correlated by globular accretions adjoining the Bowman’s membrane or infiltrating the anterior stroma [29, 73, 75, 81]. Kampik et al. describe them as rather small granules that are located around or even inside the keratocytes [73].

All parts of the sclera can be affected by ochronotic pigment granules [7375]. However, the major part of the ochronotic pigment is found to reach from the insertion of the rectus muscles towards pars-plana [29, 7375, 81]. Pigment can be either extracellular, forming beads along collagene fibers, or intracellular in macrophages and fibrocytes [28, 75, 81]. Areas of strongest pigment accumulation were associated with degeneration of sclera fibers [28, 29, 75]. Inflammatory reactions were not seen in any of the histopathologic works assessed here. Their absence is explicitly mentioned in two works [28, 82].

The structures of chamber water production and drainage are usually not commented on. However, Allen et al. describe deposit of pigment dust in the ciliar process and ciliar body [75]. The only statements on chamber angles are made by Stürmer et al. and Rones et al. who describe them as open but do not state if pigmented or not [28, 29].

Initial diagnosis

In the cases analyzed here, the initial diagnosis was often not determined correctly. In four cases, the initial diagnosis was melanoma [30, 72, 76, 79]. In another case, a patient was diagnosed as anklyosating spondylitis and referred to the ophthalmologist to exclude an accompanying iridocylitis [79]. Finally, in a case where conjunctival “vermiform” findings were the leading sign, parasitosis had been suspected [88].

Discussion

AKU is an extremely rare metabolic disorder caused by autosomal recessive inherited mutations in the HGO-gene, an enzyme of tyrosine catabolism [1, 2]. The defect of this enzyme results in accumulation of HGA in tissue and urine. In tissue HGA is oxidized to BQA which giving it a dark brown colour [1, 3, 10]. It is well established that this goes along with tissue dysfunction, resulting in arthropathy, calcification of cardiac valves and renal stone formation [3, 10]. In contrast, ocular signs are poorly investigated. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the ocular manifestations of ochronosis.

Clinical findings and complications

Ocular signs are present in at least 2/3 of the patients affected by hereditary ochronosis [1620]. In our review scleral hyperpigmentations were the most common finding (Figure 2, left). Slightly less frequent were oil-drop like pigment accumulation in the opaque limbus and pigment accumulation in the conjunctiva (Figure 2, middle and right). These results are in agreement with estimations made earlier by other authors [10, 16, 19]. It must be noted that scleral findings are easily visible even without the help of biomicroscopy and possibly patients having noticed changes on their eyes are more likely to present to an ophthalmologist than those who have not. The real frequency of corneal and other clandestine findings may therefore be underestimated.

Due to their characteristic appearance, corneal “oil-drops” are of high diagnostic significance. In agreement with others [10, 18], we think that “oil-drops” are pathognomonic to ochronosis.

The scleral pigmentations are histologically shown to affect the whole depth of the sclera between rectus muscle and pars plana. Here an association with scleral fibres was observed, resulting in degenerative changes. Clinically pigmentation was observed to overcome pars plana and continue to the limbus. Two publications report a rapid progressive astigmatism that developed at an unusual old age. Pigment continuing into the limbus was present and the axis of astigmatism was shifted by 90 ° towards the pigment orientation [21, 22]. In synopsis, these clinical and histological reports suggest that ochronotic pigment may affect the stability of the sclera and corneal margins likewise, leading to a cylinder-like deformation of the cornea.

Our analysis further revealed that pigment has also been seen in the chamber angles [23, 31, 70, 76]. It is usually referred to as being only of moderate intensity. However, it seems possible that such pigment could lead to an IOP increase. With IOP being elevated in 8 out of 14 articles reporting on it, also the frequency seems clearly elevated. Obviously, this observation might be biased by the fact that IOP is more likely to be reported in a case report if being pathologic. But even suggesting that IOP was normal in all other cases, a frequency of 8/40 would still be very high.

We were surprised to also find three cases of central vein occlusion among the case reports [70, 73, 74]. Authors of all three cases did not correlate central vein occlusion with ochronosis, it was rather seen as coincidence, possibly because none of them seemed to be aware of the case description by the others. Although a pathogenetic link is hard to see, it is difficult to believe that a frequency as high as three out of 40 cases should really be coincidence.

Two reports document acute recurrent unilateral anterior uveitis together with ochronosis [18, 24]. It was side alternating and non-granulomatous in the one, unilateral and granulomatous in the other case, suggesting distinct etiologies. As existing histologic evidence [28, 82] and the knowledge about the pathogenesis [10] of ochronosis argue against any immunologic component, we consider it to be very unlikely that ochronosis could be associated with any condition of uveitis.

We have finally shown that ochronotic pigment can also accumulate at uncommon locations, such as the corneal endothelium, the posterior surface of the lens, the iris, the vitreous, and the optic disc.

Diagnosis

Only a minority of patients is diagnosed due to the earliest sign of alkaptonuria: darkening of urine [3, 10, 15]. Most frequently diagnosis is set in adulthood when ochronosis becomes symptomatic [10, 15]. What is the value of ocular findings for establishing the diagnosis? Early works suggest scleral pigmentation to be the earliest sign of ochronosis, presenting in the mid-twenties [10, 18]. However, in the cases analysed here ocular pigmentation occurred at a mean age of 40.6 years. This seems old, however ochronosis is diagnosed in average at the age of 56 years, according to a recent review [15] and a recent case series [20] dealing with ochronosis in general. This suggests that awareness of ocular signs can anticipate the diagnosis by about 15 years.

Although ocular findings are very characteristic, a number of differential diagnoses should be thought of. Exogenous ochronosis (caused by local contact to a causative agent like resorcinol, hydroquinone, mercury, phenol, picric acid) has to be considered. It results in symptoms limited to the contact area, usually at the skin [92] but also exogenous ocular ochronosis may occur [49, 9395]. Anamnesis and ocular aspects are extremely different from hereditary ochronosis: The cornea is more frequently involved and also the central cornea is affected. Consequently vision is severely impaired [49]. Besides differential diagnoses include hyaline degenerations, Addison’s disease or scleral melanosis which can all cause scleral hyperpigmentations but do not affect the cornea. Choroid melanoma was the most popular initial diagnosis in the articles we analyzed. This differential diagnosis is of high relevance because it may not be overseen. But, vice versa, misdiagnosis of ochronosis as melanoma may also be fatal: It has lead to enucleation of a patient’s last eye [52]. Finally, pigmentation of the chamber angle could be due e.g. to a pigment-dispersion syndrome or ocular melanosis [16]. However, there is no evidence that oil-drop like plaques of the corneal limbus are present in any other condition but ochronosis.

Once the diagnosis is clinically set, it can be fortified by the detection of homogentisic acid in plasma or urine [1, 15, 96] and confirmed by genetic analysis. AKU mutations reported so far were summarized by Zatkova et al. [6].

In our literature review we found two striking examples underlining the relevance of the opthalmologist in the diagnostic process of this disease. In one instance an ochronotic eye was enucleated for suspecting melanoma, and diagnosis of ochronosis was set by the pathologist [52]. In another instance a patient was apparently long treated under the faulty diagnosis of anklyosating spondylitis. Correct diagnosis was not established until he was referred to an ophthalmologist to check for an eventual uveitis [79].

Treatment

Causative therapy of ochronosis must aim to reduce the creation of harmful BQA. This purpose could be fulfilled by three different approaches (Figure 1, blue notes): First, nitisonone (2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-cyclohexane-1,3-dione [NTBC]), inhibiting 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate-dioxygenase could block tyrosine metabolism on an earlier step, reducing the generation of HGA [97]. Second, vitamin C could exhibit an antioxidant effect on HGA and decrease its non enzymatic conversion to BQA [98, 99]. Third, restriction of tyrosine and phenylalanine could decrease their plasma levels and thereby the generation of HGA [10]. Noteworthy these treatment options have been shown to reduce HGA and BQA levels respectively. However an effect on clinical symptoms or disease progression has yet not been evidenced. Therapeutic attempts by the ophthalmologist should therefore mainly cover the treatment of ocular complications. Concerning correction of rapid progressive astigmatism, classical therapeutic options are condemned to fail, as the reason for its development is located in the corneoscleral margin, which remains unaffected in any type of corneal transplant or crosslinking. Contact lenses are usually not well tolerated in the advanced age where ochronotic astigmatism develops. The attempt of a corneal transplant has only been documented once and brought only a short amelioration before astigmatism started to advance again [21]. A subsequent bilateral thread-positioning brought also only transient relief, but progression afterwards was slower suggesting that thread-placement might be an appropriate therapeutic option. For ochronosis-induced glaucoma Bacchetti et al. showed that trabeculectomy can be a successful while topic multi-medication was inefficient [23].

Prognosis

Prognosis quo ad vitam is good. Life expectancy is believed not to differ obviously from healthy people [10, 100]. Ochronosis goes along with significant physical impairment and increased frequency of surgery at young age [3] and both are associated with decreased life expectancy. It is thus possible that ochronosis could in fact limit life expectancy via this detour which was overseen due to the low number of patients. Quo ad vistam, our work for the first time shows that ochronosis has several sight threatening complications, including astigmatism, central vein occlusion and glaucoma.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ocular findings are frequent in patients suffering from ochronosis. The pathognomonic “oil-drop” lesions of the limbus can serve as a valuable diagnostic hint. As ocular signs occur early in the development of the disease, they may anticipate the time of diagnosis and thereby open a therapeutic window. Astigmatism, glaucoma and central vein occlusion are three conditions frequently seen in patients with ochronosis. As these put vision at risk, the general physician and the ophthalmologist should be aware of them. Therapeutic options include nitisinone and antioxidant administration. Their use should be considered and started in adolescence.

Abbreviations

AKU: 

Alkaptonuria

HGO: 

Homogentisic acid 1,2 dioxygenase

HGA: 

Homogentisic acid

IOP: 

Intraocular pressure

BQA: 

Benzoquinoneacetic acid.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn
(2)
Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University Marburg

References

  1. La Du BN, Zannoni VG, Laster L, Seegmiller JE: The nature of the defect in tyrosine metabolism in alcaptonuria. J Biol Chem. 1958, 230: 251-260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Garrod E: The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet. 1902, 2: 1616-1620.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Phornphutkul C, Introne WJ, Perry MB, Bernardini I, Murphey MD, Fitzpatrick DL, Anderson PD, Huizing M, Anikster Y, Gerber LH, Gahl WA: Natural history of alkaptonuria. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 2111-2121. 10.1056/NEJMoa021736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Goicoechea De Jorge E, Lorda I, Gallardo ME, Perez B, Perez De Ferran C, Mendoza H, Rodriguez De Cordoba S: Alkaptonuria in the Dominican Republic: identification of the founder AKU mutation and further evidence of mutation hot spots in the HGO gene. J Med Genet. 2002, 39: E40-10.1136/jmg.39.7.e40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zatkova A, de Bernabe DB, Polakova H, Zvarik M, Ferakova E, Bosak V, Ferak V, Kadasi L, de Cordoba SR: High frequency of alkaptonuria in Slovakia: evidence for the appearance of multiple mutations in HGO involving different mutational hot spots. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67: 1333-1339. 10.1086/321209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Zatkova A: An update on molecular genetics of Alkaptonuria (AKU). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011, 34: 1127-1136. 10.1007/s10545-011-9363-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Knox WE, Edwards SW: Homogentisate oxidase of liver. J Biol Chem. 1955, 216: 479-487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Knox WE, Le M-KM: The oxidation in liver of l-tyrosine to acetoacetate through p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate and homogentisic acid. Biochem J. 1951, 49: 686-693.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumann E: Ueber das Wesen der Alkaptonurie. 1894, Berlin: Druck und Verlag von Georg ReimerGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Brien WM, La Du BN, Bunim JJ: Biochemical, pathologic and clinical aspects of alcaptonuria, ochronosis and ochronotic arthropathy: review of world literature (1584–1962). Am J Med. 1963, 34: 813-838. 10.1016/0002-9343(63)90089-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zannoni VG, Malawista SE, La Du BN: Studies on ochronosis. II. Studies on benzoquinoneacetic acid, a probale intermediate in the connective tissue pigmentation of alcaptonuria. Arthritis Rheum. 1962, 5: 547-556. 10.1002/art.1780050603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaines JJ: The pathology of alkaptonuric ochronosis. Hum Pathol. 1989, 20: 40-46. 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90200-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Albrecht H: [On Ochronosis]. Z Heilk. 1902, 23: 366-Google Scholar
  14. Virchow RL: Ein Fall von allgemeiner Ochronose der Knorpel und knorpelähnlichen Theile. Virchows Arch. 1866, 37: 212-219. 10.1007/BF01935634.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Khaled A, Kerkeni N, Hawilo A, Fazaa B, Kamoun MR: Endogenous ochronosis: case report and a systematic review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2011, 50: 262-267. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04668.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sallmann L: Über die Augenpigmentierung bei endogener Ochronose. Z Augenheilkd. 1926, 60: 164-171.Google Scholar
  17. Cambiaso RH: Ocular ochronosis with alcaptonuria and osteoarthritis; personal observation. Prensa Med Argent. 1955, 42: 3309-3318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith JW: Ochronosis of the sclera and cornea complicating alkaptonuria. JAMA. 1942, 120: 1282-1288. 10.1001/jama.1942.02830510020005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Offel JF, De Clerck LS, Francx LM, Stevens WJ: The clinical manifestations of ochronosis: a review. Acta Clin Belg. 1995, 50: 358-362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladjouze-Rezig A, Rodriguez de Cordoba S, Aquaron R: Ochronotic rheumatism in Algeria: clinical, radiological, biological and molecular studies–a case study of 14 patients in 11 families. Joint Bone Spine. 2006, 73: 284-292. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2005.03.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehongo A, Schrooyen M, Pereleux A: [Important bilateral corneal astigmatism in a case of ocular ochronosis]. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2005, 295: 17-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheskes J, Buettner H: Ocular manifestations of alkaptonuric ochronosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000, 118: 724-725. 10.1001/archopht.118.5.724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bacchetti S, Zeppieri M, Brusini P: A case of ocular ochronosis and chronic open-angle glaucoma: merely coincidental?. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004, 82: 631-632. 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00288.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. John SS, Padhan P, Mathews JV, David S: Acute anterior uveitis as the initial presentation of alkaptonuria. J Postgrad Med. 2009, 55: 35-37. 10.4103/0022-3859.48438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Soker Cakmak S, Cevik R, Aksunger A, Unlu K, Ava S: Ocular ochronosis: a case report and clinical findings. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002, 80: 340-342. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800321.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hatch JL: Hereditary alkaptonuria with ochronosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1959, 62: 575-578. 10.1001/archopht.1959.04220040037005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Seitz R: Ochronosic pigmentations of the eye. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1954, 125: 432-440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rones B: Ochronosis oculi in alkaptonuria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960, 49: 440-446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sturmer J, Lang GK, Munzer M: [Ochronosis oculi]. Pathologe. 1988, 9: 295-301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Himmel S, Adelstein N: Ocular Ochronosis with Alkaptonuria. Report of a case. Ohio State Med J. 1967, 63: 912-913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindner M, Strempel I, Sekundo W, Bertelmann T: Symmetrisch angeordnete Hyperpigmentierungen der Sklera. Z prakt Augenheilkd. 2012, 33: 273-276.Google Scholar
  32. Cope CB, Kassander P: Cortisone in ochronotic arthritis. J Am Med Assoc. 1952, 150: 997-999. 10.1001/jama.1952.03680100039012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Adams EJ, Ward JR: Alkaptonuria. A case report. Rocky Mt Med J. 1975, 72: 68-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vail D: Ocular ochronosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956, 41: 712-714.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Francois J: Ocular manifestations in aminoacidopathies. Monogr Hum Genet. 1972, 6: 99-113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Casanovas J, Casanovas R: [Ocular manifestations in rheumatic diseases (new contributions)]. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol. 1970, 30: 841-854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Clayton BE: Symposium on metabolic diseases of the eye, Biochemical remarks on amino acid metabolism. Proc R Soc Med. 1963, 56: 18-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brancato R: Ocular alterations in hereditary ochronosis. (Collective review). Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1965, 91: 1335-1349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wirtschafter JD: The eye in alkaptonuria. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1976, 12: 279-293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Aldenbratt A, Rosen K, Eggertsen R: [Clinical eye for blue-coloured ears lead to the correct diagnosis: alkaptonuria]. Lakartidningen. 2010, 107: 2718-2719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghenoiu O, Rovinescu I, Anastasescu G, Stoia I: [Ochronotic arthropathy. (Presentation of a clinical case)]. Med Interna (Bucur). 1970, 22: 625-634.Google Scholar
  42. Greco GM, Magli A: [Eye manifestations of amino acid disorders]. Minerva Pediatr. 1978, 30: 761-780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Konstantinov D, Solakov P: [Ochronosis with severe arthropathy and internal organ lesions]. Vutr Boles. 1975, 14: 104-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Maciejasz A: Results of a 6-year observation of a case of ocular ochronosis coexisting with melanuria. Klin Oczna. 1971, 41: 439-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Maciejasz A, Frendo J: [A case of ocular ochronosis with coexisting melanuria]. Klin Oczna. 1966, 36: 379-384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Svec V, Jorda V, Vykydal M, Pegrimova E: [Ochronosis of the eye]. Cesk Oftalmol. 1972, 28: 23-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Medkova L, Malyszova M: [Eye symptoms in alkaptonuric ochronosis]. Cesk Oftalmol. 1962, 18: 34-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodenhauser JH: Eye involvement in alkaptonuria. Dtsch Med J. 1958, 9: 38-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. [Annotations]: OCULAR ochronosis. Lancet. 1955, 268: 1162-1163.Google Scholar
  50. Babel J, Houber JP: [Keratoconus and blue sclera in a congenital anomaly of connective tissue]. J Genet Hum. 1969, 17: 241-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tanase-Mogos I, Ciortoloman H, Petrescu L, Ankar V, Patea P, Popescu M, Grigorescu G: [Comparative biochemical studies of certain urinary metabolites in patients with the nephrotic syndrome, eye diseases, alkaptonuria, obstructive myocardiopathy, and cancer and in newborn infants]. Physiologie. 1981, 18: 251-260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Skinsnes OK: Generalized ochronosis; report of an instance in which it was misdiagnosed as melanosarcoma, with resultant enucleation of an eye. Arch Pathol (Chic). 1948, 45: 552-558.Google Scholar
  53. Pandey R, Kumar A, Garg R, Khanna P, Darlong V: Perioperative management of patient with alkaptonuria and associated multiple comorbidities. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011, 27: 259-261. 10.4103/0970-9185.81839.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilke A, Dapunt O, Steverding D: Image of the month. Bluish-black pigmentation of the sclera and the aortic valve in a patient with alkaptonuric ochronosis. Herz. 2010, 35: 41-10.1007/s00059-010-3301-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Cobos Soler FJ, Molero Cabrilla R: [Ochronosis: a case report with multisystemic affectation, including pericardium]. An Med Interna. 2002, 19: 583-585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Carlesimo M, Bonaccorsi P, Tamburrano G, Carboni I, Parisi A, Calvier S: Alkaptonuria. Dermatology. 1999, 199: 70-71. 10.1159/000018186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Guhl B, Modder B, Guhl C: [The clinical and radiological pictures of alcaptonuria and ochronosis (author’s transl)]. Rontgenblatter. 1981, 34: 220-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Babel J: Rheumatism and the eye. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol. 1973, 33: 341-354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Searle J, Kerr JF: Ochronotic arthropathy. Description of a case with observations on the mode of formation of an osteophyte. Med J Aust. 1971, 2: 713-715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. DeCaprio AP: The toxicology of hydroquinone–relevance to occupational and environmental exposure. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1999, 29: 283-330. 10.1080/10408449991349221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Reed DN, Gregg FO, Corpe RS: Minocycline-induced black bone disease encountered during total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012, 35: e737-e739. 10.3928/01477447-20120426-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Fuchs U: Electron microscopic study of homogentisic acid-melanin in ochronosis. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1967, 344: 243-248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rao VA: Anterior megalophthalmos associated with lamellar cataract on alkaptonuria. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1982, 30: 109-110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Essalmi L, Roncato M, Mermet I, Magy-Bertrand N, Meaux-Ruault N, Gil H, Dupond JL: [Bluish-brown sclera and ears]. Rev Med Interne. 2007, 28: 42-43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma A, Sharma SK, Wanchu A, Kumar M, Singh S, Bambery P: Lower-back pain, intervertebral-disc calcification and scleral pigmentation. Med J Aust. 2006, 184: 643-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. De Boer J, van Dam GW, Franken AA: A woman with bluish-coloured ears. Neth J Med. 2003, 61: 193-212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mariotti G, Schlumpf U, Hofer B, Pedrinis E: Early arthroses, marked ochronotic spondylopathy and chondrocalcinosis of the spine - differential diagnostic considerations on a rare disease. Aktuelle Rheumatol. 1993, 18: 136-141. 10.1055/s-2008-1047327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Guggenberger K, Seidl O, Schmoeckel C: [Alkaptonuria (ochronosis)]. Hautarzt. 1983, 34: 348-350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rozsa I, Ritter L: [Surgical case of an uncommon knee joint disease]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1968, 104: 594-597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. D’Alessandro C, Malbran E: [Ocular Ochronosis]. Arch Oftalmol B Aires. 1963, 38: 299-305.Google Scholar
  71. Carlson DM, Helgeson MK, Hiett JA: Ocular ochronosis from alkaptonuria. J Am Optom Assoc. 1991, 62: 854-856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Felbor U, Mutsch Y, Grehn F, Muller CR, Kress W: Ocular ochronosis in alkaptonuria patients carrying mutations in the homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase gene. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999, 83: 680-683. 10.1136/bjo.83.6.680.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Kampik A, Sani JN, Green WR: Ocular ochronosis. Clinicopathological, histochemical, and ultrastructural studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980, 98: 1441-1447. 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040293017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ashton N, Kirker JG, Lavery FS: Ocular findings in a case of hereditary ochronosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1964, 48: 405-415. 10.1136/bjo.48.8.405.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Allen RA, O’Malley C, Straatsma BR: Ocular findings in hereditary ochronosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961, 65: 657-668. 10.1001/archopht.1961.01840020659010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodenhauser JH: Eye pigmentations in alkaptonuria (ochronosis oculi). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1957, 131: 202-215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Garrett EE: Ocular ochronosis with alkaptonuria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963, 55: 617-620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Laugier P, Guidet M, Bulte C, Royer J: [A case of ochronosis]. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1964, 71: 380-381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Royer JR: [The ocular manifestations of ochronosis]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1965, 65: 500-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Teller H, Winkler K: [Clinical and histopathological aspects of endogenous ochronosis]. Hautarzt. 1973, 24: 537-543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Daicker B, Riede UN: [Histological and ultrastructural findings in alkaptonuric ocular ochronosis]. Ophthalmologica. 1974, 169: 377-388. 10.1159/000307140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ben Rayana N, Chahed N, Khochtali S, Ghorbel M, Hamdi R, Rouis M, Bouajina I, Hamida FB: [Ocular ochronosis. A case report]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2008, 31: 624-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Gucev ZS, Slaveska N, Laban N, Danilovski D, Tasic V, Pop-Jordanova N, Zatkova A: Early-onset ocular ochronosis in a girl with alkaptonuria (AKU) and a novel mutation in homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (HGD). Prilozi. 2011, 32: 305-311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ryan A, O’Toole L: Images in clinical medicine. Ochronosis. N Engl J Med. 2012, 367: e26-10.1056/NEJMicm1111515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Schmidt D: [A 69-year-old patient with brown-black pigmentation of the sclera]. Ophthalmologe. 2011, 108: 1171-1174. 10.1007/s00347-011-2428-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sampaolesi R, Reca RM, Kaufer G: [Alkaptonuria and endogenous ochronosis with dislocation of crystalline lens and secondary glaucoma]. Arch Oftalmol B Aires. 1967, 42: 165-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Sharma V, Chong YY, Kosmin A: Alkaptonuria presenting with conjunctival lesion. Compr Ther. 2007, 33: 71-72. 10.1007/s12019-007-8010-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Hackethal U, Busse H, Seitz HM, Gerding H: [Vermiform conjunctival structures]. Ophthalmologe. 2004, 101: 626-628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Chevez Barrios P, Font RL: Pigmented conjunctival lesions as initial manifestation of ochronosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004, 122: 1060-1063. 10.1001/archopht.122.7.1060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Lievre , Desvignes , Boussette : [Ophthalmological findings in alkaptonuria]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1958, 3: 219-221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Martin WJ, Underdahl LO, Mathieson DR, Pugh DG: Alkaptonuria: report of 12 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1955, 42: 1052-1064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Levin CY, Maibach H: Exogenous ochronosis: an update on clinical features, causative agents and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001, 2: 213-217. 10.2165/00128071-200102040-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Naumann G: Corneal damage in hydroquinone workers. A clinicopathologic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966, 76: 189-194. 10.1001/archopht.1966.03850010191007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Naumann G, Rossmann H: [Corneal lesions in hydroquinone workers]. Ophthalmologica. 1969, 158 (Suppl): 371-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Hedges TR, Kenyon KR, Hanninen LA, Mosher DB: Corneal and conjunctival effects of monobenzone in patients with vitiligo. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983, 101: 64-68. 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010066010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Seegmiller JE, Zannoni VG, Laster L, La Du BN: An enzymatic spectrophotometric method for the determination of homogentisic acid in plasma and urine. J Biol Chem. 1961, 236: 774-777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Anikster Y, Nyhan WL, Gahl WA: NTBC and alkaptonuria. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 920-921. 10.1086/302027.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Kamoun P, Coude M, Forest M, Montagutelli X, Guenet JL: Ascorbic acid and alkaptonuria. Eur J Pediatr. 1992, 151: 149-10.1007/BF01958966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Lustberg TJ, Schulman JD, Seegmiller JE: Decreased binding of 14C-homogentisic acid induced by ascorbic acid in connective tissue of rats with experimental alcaptonuria. Nature. 1970, 228: 770-771. 10.1038/228770a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Srsen S, Vondracek J, Srsnova K, Svac J: [Analysis of the life span of alkaptonuric patients]. Cas Lek Cesk. 1985, 124: 1288-1291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/14/12/prepub

Copyright

© Lindner and Bertelmann; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.